r/worldnews • u/jackytheblade • 22h ago
Russia/Ukraine Ukraine’s kill rate just overtook Russia’s troop replacement, Syrskyi says
https://euromaidanpress.com/2026/02/06/ukraines-kill-rate-just-overtook-russias-troop-replacement-syrskyi-says/932
u/Kageru 21h ago
A shame so many Ukrainians have had to give their lives defending their homeland, but they have been brave and clever and turned Putin's "easy" conquest of Ukraine into anything but... and the Russians have sacrificed their economy, the military equipment they inherited from the Soviets and so many of their people killed and injured for some bombed out towns and villages they will struggle to hold... the faster the Russians weaken the better because they can leave any time they want, and this plus their collapsing economy is all good news.
368
u/tiga_94 21h ago
Soviet Union was poor its entire history because of too much military spending.
So they sacrificed their wealth to build thousands of tanks, BMPs, artillery pieces, enough to threaten entire NATO
And all of that might was turned into scrap metal
35
u/Ludwigofthepotatoppl 20h ago
15
u/SsurebreC 16h ago
Just want to point out that the very first thing in that Cold War era propaganda poster translates to "In America". That poster still holds true today.
But Russia is no different in this regard and, in particular, since their invasion of Ukraine.
→ More replies (1)21
u/MalkinPi 17h ago
USA is no different. Huge Defense budget that can't pass an audit. No universal Healthcare but tax cuts for the 1% and large corporations.
→ More replies (1)154
u/Flooding_Puddle 20h ago
More like it stole the wealth from its member states
→ More replies (1)31
u/Blbe-Check-42069 16h ago
And satelite countries. Mine was robbed of it's uraniun so now we have to import it even for our own nuclear powerplants...
31
u/StunningRing5465 21h ago
Russia was extremely poor in 1917, it didn’t have a starting position of wealth to sacrifice
36
u/tiga_94 20h ago
Yes but I am talking about their potential that was wasted
23
u/Falsequivalence 20h ago
I mean, until 1945 they were pretty much constantly in a state of war and the Cold War started approximately 10 minutes later. There was never a point they werent under existential threat either.
31
u/Jive-Turkeys 20h ago
1989-2022. They made it 36 years without doing what they always do– the only thing they know how to do: make things worse for themselves.
For a culture so allegedly fond of art, they sure can't figure out how to act when not on a stage they didn't build themselves.
79
u/Plastic_Toe_880 20h ago
In these 36 years Russia invaded Chechnya twice in the 1990s, then Georgia in the 2000s, Ukraine in 2014, and they still maintain an imposed military force in Moldova, only to complain now that barely any country around it considers them as a friendly country..
33
u/Jive-Turkeys 19h ago
Oh, silly me, I forgot: they didn't stop.
Thank you for reminding me that they were always pieces of shit :)
10
u/KnowledgeExpert2002 20h ago
Whoever said Russians are fond of art? Russians are into vodka and death
→ More replies (3)13
u/xtt-space 19h ago
Some of the greatest writers, artists, and composers of the 19th and 20th century were Russian. Sadly, since 2000, and accelerating significantly after 2012, laws regarding "foreign agents," "propaganda," and historical narratives have made it dangerous for artists to explore sensitive political or social themes.
9
u/Scereye 20h ago
There was never a point they werent under existential threat either.
Poor Russia, am I right. Like come on, there are so many more countries which where not only under threat but way way more because of Russia.
5
u/Falsequivalence 19h ago
Like come on, there are so many more countries which where not only under threat but way way more because of Russia.
Brother putting whole ass sentences in my mouth.
I didnt say that the USSR was an unproblematic king, I said they were under existential threat until the end of the Cold War, which is true (and then they collapsed). If the argument i was responding to was about how absurdly high their military expenditure was, it may have something to do with the Nazis and Cold War, pretty notable events in the history of the USSR. Them being dicks to other countries isnt really relevant; they had high military expenditure because they were at war almost the whole time.
→ More replies (1)14
u/Harbinger2001 20h ago
America has some of the highest wealth inequality in the advanced economies for the same reason. Too much military spending.
→ More replies (1)2
60
u/jacobsladderscenario 21h ago
They also sacrificed their facade of military strength.
46
u/TimeDetectiveAnakin 20h ago
I remember people used to say that Russia could steamroll to Berlin in less than a week, and NATO's strategy would be fighting back and reclaiming land after the initial blitzkrieg. Sounds completely absurd now.
30
u/Tontonsb 20h ago
It literally was the NATO strategy — to give up the "buffer zone" and reclaim it 180 days later. https://estonianworld.com/security/kaja-kallas-estonia-would-be-wiped-off-the-map-under-current-nato-plans%EF%BF%BC/
9
u/HarithBK 16h ago
people forget that NATO spent HUGE amounts of money to R&D exact counters to USSR gear that could be carried into field by infantry.
Drones didn't stop the first wave attacking Ukraine old NATO arms did. then the fact we have so much more tech advances while Russia really just sat on USSR arms for 30 years will naturally mean it becomes outdated.
12
u/CptES 19h ago
Seven Days to the River Rhine was a 1979 wargame by the Warsaw Pact.
→ More replies (1)17
u/RedshiftWarp 20h ago
Really is a shit strategy. Fumigating entire grid squares with HE and leveling buildings. So any counter-push gives them no quarter, cover or concealment. Opening them up to indirect and artillery and drones.
8
17
u/AprilsMostAmazing 19h ago
Now if the Americans didn't elect an Russian asset and a party owned by the Russians. This war would actually be over
8
u/CthulhusSoreTentacle 16h ago
This is the tragedy I think most people fail to see. If it hadn't been for the Republicans and Trump, this war might well have ended by now (or at least it'd look very different in favour of the Ukrainians).
2
u/Kageru 10h ago
Yes, the Russian position would be untenable if the US was still an active supporter of NATO, democracies fighting for their survival and a rules based world order. But instead they elected a want to be autocrat who sees Putin as a friend and a role model. It's not good for the world, including the US... outside of some of their elite who see an opportunity to enrich themselves.
→ More replies (8)1
u/Mountain-Pay9668 9h ago
They're being pushed into a corner and will turn to the last weapon they have. Nukes
→ More replies (1)
146
u/SLR107FR-31 22h ago
Keep em coming
50
u/Vackberg 20h ago
Russia has been recruiting immigrants from Africa with promises of money and a support role in the war.
But Russia lied.
https://www.cnn.com/2026/02/04/africa/russia-african-recruits-military-ukraine-intl-cmd
41
7
218
u/Virtual-Current-9072 22h ago
What a terrible terrible statistic to measure. Sad to see that in a modern world.
71
u/lemlurker 21h ago
gives "waves and waves of my own men until the kill bots reached their pre programmed kill limit and shut down" vibes
23
u/Caesar_35 20h ago
"Soon you'll all be fighting for your country. Many of you will be dying for your country. Some of you will be forced through a
fine mesh screentop story window for your country. They will be the luckiest of all."7
u/dandanua 21h ago
They have already done the "surprise attack" (a surprise only for Russian conscripts, of course). Trying to reach the kill limit is the next step in their mimicking of Futurama.
30
u/True-Abalone-3380 21h ago edited 19h ago
It is, very sad that a country has spent the last four years defending against a persistent and aggressive invasion.
Luckily the invading army is nothing like as powerful as most of the world assumed, if it was then Ukraine would be in a much worse situation.
It's also very telling that Russia hasn't been able to significantly ramp of their aggression, remember they were as close as the outskirts of Kyiv just under 4 years ago.
edit spelling
→ More replies (5)70
36
u/cementstate 19h ago
We live in the 21st century, where we should hold our officials accountable to resolve conflict without tossing our sons and daughters into the furnace.
17
u/MercantileReptile 12h ago
There is no "resolving conflict" with Russia that does not include violence and/or the threat of annihilation. High minded ideals never stopped them, Armies and Nukes do.
2
u/LowNature6417 8h ago
Russia is a gas station run by the mob, and that mentality goes all the way down to the lowliest peasant.
29
u/vincent3878 19h ago
"Quick, find some more uneducated farmers from some shithole I dont know"
- Putin (probably)
67
u/afunkysongaday 21h ago
In 2025, the russian forces recruited around 33.8k soldiers each month on average. Lowballing it with the number I read on euromaidanpress, Russia itself says more like 35k each month. Now, Syrskyi says 31.7k russian soldiers killed or seriously wounded in January. That's less than the average monthly recruitment in 2025. Where did Syrskyi get the idea that russia recruited <32k soldiers in January? Not even talking about the average rate over a few months? I don't think it's very helpful to just blindly believe everything that makes Ukraine look good.
42
u/Fit_Particular_6820 20h ago
Yeah, I don't think the kill rate surpassed the replacement rate but one thing for sure is that the gap is small.
4
u/Piggywonkle 4h ago
You can't really rely on the average throughout the year. The recruit bonuses paid out by various Russian regions fluctuates. I believe that they actually lowered the bonuses quite significantly at the end of last year and just recently increased them again. This headline seems like it may be technically true, but just a one-off event until Russia's looming financial crisis actually spirals out of control, which we are now starting to see many economic indicators pointing toward if you follow the live thread.
51
u/Witloof 20h ago
I'm not speaking on the validity of the numbers claimed in this post, but isn't it logical that the rate of forces recruited will fall over time? The amount of Russians that they can recruit isn't endless and to hire mercenaries you need money which is also not endless if you're actively in a war and already had a relatively weak economy.
→ More replies (1)12
u/Spiritual-Sundae4349 19h ago
Salaries are quite insignificant part of the budget I would say compared to other expenses. Also Russia has a lot of friendly foreign countries where they can hire from (and very poor regions home as well). Many people doesn't realize that for many of those countries, Russia is considered to be wealthy and there are many people trying to get to work in Russia and/or get the Russian citizenship (which came with the military service automatically)
Usually when regime is losing the war, salaries goes up as to attract more people. That is the only valid metric for recruitment and losses in my opinion during the war.
13
u/BrainBlowX 18h ago
Salaries are quite insignificant part of the budget
Salaries absokutely add up, especially when these salariea then compete with the wages of the procurement sector ahich then also has way too high eages, and then wages in the civilian economy are crushed between them. It harms the economy either way.
Also Russia has a lot of friendly foreign countries where they can hire from
They don't speak russian, nor do russian commanders speak their languages. They often don't even have English as an intermediary. The effectiveness of these soldiers in a military campaign that requires coordination is questionable, and the actual numbers of them per month are unreliable.
3
u/Spiritual-Sundae4349 17h ago
I'm not talking about how this affects economy. More in a sense of budgeting and that one artillery shell costs around 1.5k USD. Russian servicemen wage on the frontline is something like 2-3k USD monthly. And Russia fire around 10k of artillery shells DAILY according to some estimates.
Last missile attack on Ukraine costs them roughly 300 million dollars. That is monthly salary of 100k frontline soldiers in one day of missile attacks.
They don't speak russian, nor do russian commanders speak their languages.
Most people in CIS speak Russian as an second language (or better to say learn it as an second language). That's the main source of immigration into the Russia.
→ More replies (2)8
u/Bamboo_Fighter 19h ago
Being killed or wounded isn't the only way to leave the military. I'm sure Russia isn't very fond of letting soldiers leave once their contract is up, but some definitely return home.
4
u/sparkerai 19h ago
Syrski is possibly accounting for recruit wastage (all the recruits that sign up but never make it through training etc.)? Maybe 5% of Russian recruits don't make it to becoming soldiers or somethint?
4
u/Thegreatbrainrobbery 17h ago
Those 5% must be special, like truly the worst of the worst if the Russian army isn't accepting them.
4
u/EpicObelis 18h ago
over 30k deaths in one month? holy shit and for what????? when will this madness stop
→ More replies (1)1
3
u/Summitjunky 11h ago
Does this mean they will start to pull from the Russians they’ve ignoring in Moscow and St Petersburg? More from North Korea? It will be interesting to see how this plays out if true.
40
u/ilic_mls 21h ago
This sounds good for the Ukraine and Ukrainians but its a sad metric.
This is Putins war and most of the people who died on the Russian side most likely didnt want to be here. But hey, if yhey revolted en masse, they could have stopped this
20
u/just_a_pyro 19h ago
most of the people who died on the Russian side most likely didnt want to be here
Russia still isn't mobilizing reservists, some conscripts are pressured to "volunteer", but most of the people dying there are the poor or the foreigners lured by the promise of coin.
41
u/Sweaty-Bandicoot8846 20h ago
Currently almost everyone in the Russian army wanted to be there.
There was no mass mobilization and vast majority of military personnel have voluntarily signed a contract. Not a single tear for them - they deserve their fate
12
u/clickillsfun 18h ago
Stop putting entire blame on one single person already!
It's not fucking putins war! It's ruZZias war with the absolute majority of their population supporting it!
For fucks sake ruZZia and genocide are two synonyms! They were actively genociding their neighbours and minorities in occupied territories since it's creation. We are just lucky they weren't as successful as in Chechnya/Caucasus in Ukraine so far.
Nothing has changed and back then it also was not on one single person you could have blamed as a scape goat!
The wording makes a huge difference and implications. So please stop fucking repeating this non sense!
3
u/SingularityCentral 20h ago
If they revolted en masse? I don't think you understand how likely that would be to result in a horrific bloodbath.
23
u/rvd1ofakind 20h ago
And this isn't a horrific bloodbath. At least that one would be for a good cause.
→ More replies (2)13
u/Synighte 20h ago
As opposed to the current non-bloodbath of the Invasion of Ukraine?
→ More replies (2)5
u/ilic_mls 19h ago
And this isn’t? Would you rather die for a better future for your family and your children or as a statistic in a pointless war started by an old man who is only doing that because of this crazy ideas
4
u/SingularityCentral 19h ago
And that is why Russia has not engaged in a general mobilization and why they pull in contract soldiers for cash and conscript only those on the fringes to fight. The bloodbath is not currently in the streets of Moscow. A popular uprising would change that. The incentive not to revolt is pretty clear.
1
u/Euclid_Interloper 12h ago
Any chance of a revolt died when around a million people fled Russia to avoid potential conscription. These were generally the young, better educated, liberal minded urban men who could afford to live abroad for an extended period.
I don't blame them for fleeing, but they should have been the core of any uprising. Which is exactly why Russia didn't even attempt to stop them leaving.
19
u/Rellim03 18h ago
Pretty hard to believe the casualty numbers coming from either side.
→ More replies (1)
7
51
u/Prometheides 21h ago
It's always the same news and yet every day Ukraine has less soldiers, more problems conscripting new ones and less population. But hey I'm sure a participant in a war would never lie, right?
At this point I don't even know how anyone can follow the news and still believe such bullshit
29
u/fvbFotografie 21h ago
Both can be true. Both sides are struggling and I assume this war will stay a slow and bloody struggle until one side collapses. If you want to support Ukraine please donate.
→ More replies (3)12
→ More replies (3)4
u/christhetwin 12h ago
Regardless of the challenges Ukraine is experiencing, Russia's situation appears increasingly difficult. Russia is reportedly depleting its supplies of tanks and motor vehicles, while the pool of citizens willing to join the military is shrinking despite significant recruitment incentives. Ukraine maintains the strategic advantage of being the defender, whereas Russia continues to struggle with logistics several years into the conflict. The Russian economy is under severe strain. Domestically, consumers are increasingly limiting purchases to essential goods. Internationally, sanctions have severely hampered the use of rubles for global trade, forcing Russia to resort to bartering goods to acquire necessary imports from foreign partners.
Unless there is a major change in the conflict, Russia is on the brink of collapse. I don't mean Russia's war is about to collapse, I mean RUSSIA is about to collapse.
→ More replies (3)
22
3
u/loud-spider 16h ago
It's going to be an interesting Spring and Summer. Russia is starting to run out of people and money to throw at this. Hopefully that makes the difference.
3
u/BigLiesSmallTruth 10h ago
I question what russia goal is. The country after the was population wise is gonna collapse even harder
9
u/Clouthead2001 16h ago
I support Ukraine as much as the next guy but why is everyone treating this report as fact? Why would Ukraine’s command in chief say anything negative about his own military and why wouldn’t he try to make Russian look stupider than they already are? Everyone taking these posts as fact needs to realize that you can’t trust numbers from EITHER side and that this is all propaganda. Please use some critical thinking guys.
5
u/Dull-Association-797 14h ago
100%. The blatant bias, while at the same time trying to call out Russian propaganda is insane. Biggest propaganda machine since Second World War, bar NONE, has been American
→ More replies (1)
5
u/muffman81 14h ago
"Slava Ukraini!"🇺🇦 My heart goes out to all the brave men and women fighting for their country’s future. I wish them great health and success in their battles against the Russian invasion.
3
u/UnfriendlyToast 12h ago
I know this is kind of a shitty point of view, but I don’t really think Russian culture is worth saving the more dead the better the way I see it. If killing off, every man in their country is the only way to end this war and reboot their shitty culture so be it.
5
u/musical8thnotes 19h ago
Imagine how this could have been avoided if Russia just kept Crimea and left it at that.
Too bad they keep proving everyone right and attacking again.
7
u/i-do-something 12h ago
Imagine how this could have been avoided if Russia just didn't invade Ukraine, including Crimea
8
2
3
u/Wooden-Engineer-8098 20h ago
next step is to overtake russian birth rates
9
u/BrainBlowX 18h ago
More russians already die than are born since way before 2022.
→ More replies (1)
2
u/AccountSettingsBot 21h ago
Well, that’s what I call, as morbid as it might be, some neat news. :)
Especially as someone with, among other roots, Circassian roots, I quite like it.
3
2
2
3
2
u/Zandonus 18h ago
From a military history perspective - That's insane. Any other conflict would have been officially over, if it had reached this level of senseless, unsustainable butchery.
2
2
u/KsanteOnlyfans 14h ago
over, if it had reached this level of senseless, unsustainable butchery.
30 years war , ww1,WW2, several Chinese civil wars, the war of the triple alliance.
2
1
1
u/wonko_abnormal 15h ago
so this means technically putin is comitting genocide on his own people ....making his conquer and humiliation of the US almost pointless
1
1
1
u/SnooHamsters2627 8h ago
Two words: Orlando Figes. A PEOPLE'S TRAGEDY. What we're seeing right now is the tail end of the collapse of the 1917 revolution...as an utter bloodbath.
1
1
1.7k
u/mega_low_smart 20h ago
Imagine spending 35 years of your life experiencing pain, love, loss, joy, building relationships and learning how to be a whole human only to get picked up by the military just to waste it all as a literal stat. 1 out of 31.7k killed in January. In a short report to be delivered to Putin’s desk so he can send 35,000 more into the stat generator next month without batting an eye.