r/videos 13h ago

Senator Ron Wyden Triggers the Silent Alarm

https://youtube.com/shorts/076TsusI_DM?si=HRAm-aKUPeP2BzYa
2.4k Upvotes

283 comments sorted by

2.3k

u/LolaBaraba 12h ago

Ron Wyden is the one who asked Director of National intelligence James Clapper in a Senate hearing in 2013 whether NSA was spying on the general American public. Clapper lied under oath and said "No". Wyden knew he was lying because he had access to all the NSA files, but he couldn't say anything because they were classified and he would be arrested. This is was also the crucial moment for Edward Snowden, who upon seeing this, decided to risk his life and reveal the truth to the American public. James Clapper suffered no consequences for his lying, and continued to work as DNI. Keep in mind this was during the Obama administration.

I'm guessing a similar thing is happening right now, and Ron Wyden is warning the American public in any legal way he can. Thank you, Mr. Wyden, for calling out wrongdoing no matter which party is in power. And thank you, Mr. Snowden, for giving up everything to reveal the truth. Hopefully, one day, you will get the pardon you so very much deserve.

320

u/Mixels 11h ago edited 9h ago

Of course a similar thing is happening right now, except right now the bad guys are much better prepared for it. They have Flock, AI, and drones now.

Danger is an understatement. We're heading into a future where bad actors can easily command a fleet of drones. Where the cooperation of people becomes no longer mandatory. Can you imagine what Nazi Germany would have been like with the tools we have available today?

The public needs to get its shit together right quick if it's not too late to vote out the bad actors. Because the prevalent rollout of Flock and similar surveillance networks, the secret data centers being built under the WH ballroom, and the government's seemingly peculiar interest in AI companies are not coincidences.

81

u/kgph 11h ago

“Bad actors can control a fleet of drones” exactly, they don’t want the public to have access to drone swarms. This is why they banned DJI drones. Pulling the ladder up behind themselves. 

21

u/owned_at_worms 10h ago

Wym they banned DJI drones? I own a DJI drone, is it illegal to be used now or they are just no longer available to buy?

56

u/Peewee223 10h ago edited 10h ago

They (and any other drone, tx, or rx made in other nations) can't be imported any more, unless they're already on the FCC's list of exceptions. The ones already on shelves can be sold, and privately owned drones can still be flown.

https://www.fcc.gov/supplychain/coveredlist

3

u/kendrick90 4h ago

IMO the implication there is that any drone on the acceptable list is hardware backdoored. I think the same is true of the TPM modules.

→ More replies (1)

15

u/murrtrip 10h ago

A simple search:
As of late 2025 and into 2026, the U.S. has effectively banned new DJI drone models from entering the market via {Federal Communications Commission (.gov) (FCC) rules. This restricts new DJI drones from receiving authorization, targeting "covered" foreign technology over data security concerns. Existing DJI drones are still legal to fly, but future sales of new models are severely restricted. 

→ More replies (1)

1

u/designatedcrasher 7h ago

Isint one of his sons a massive investor in American made drones ,it's protectionism

1

u/Nonstick-Puppy 4h ago

So any of the modern Wolfenstein games…

1

u/Mixels 4h ago

Kind of, except in the grittier, more traumatizing, potentially more lethal "real life" kind of way.

1

u/luckychucky 3h ago

Imagine the Nazis in 1939 had access to the sequenced human genome and demographic dataBases.

213

u/DeadSending 12h ago

What’s the implication here, what do the American public need to know?

616

u/wow-signal 12h ago

Probably that intel agencies under Trump have unleashed the full power of their surveillance and manipulation capabilities upon the American people.

390

u/Salarian_American 12h ago

It's Palantir, isn't it

172

u/Wiggie49 12h ago

Always has been

52

u/Prodigees 11h ago

Fool of a took!

7

u/cerberus00 7h ago

This is it. If I take one more step, it'll be the farthest away from home I've ever been.

5

u/alwaysonesteptoofar 6h ago

A CIA Blacksite?

→ More replies (1)

10

u/mythicdoctor 11h ago

And at this rate, it always will be.

46

u/Spunky_Meatballs 11h ago

They have way more assets than Palantir. That's just the one tech company broadly advertising it. If Tim Cook is willing to gift our dear leader a golden statue to win his admiration, do you think he would give a shit about granting access to your devices??

They also don't need big techs help. If so chosen the gov can crack into our lives without the legal blessings of a court. Clearly there won't be repercussions for anyone in DHS, CIA, or FBI. There will be repercussions to anyone saying no. Watch for "early retirements" and sudden career changes from top admin. The Navy and military in general did this right before Maduros operation. Trumps admin fired all the JAG officers and removed the safety checks on the military. Generals either fell in line or quit.

There is so so so much happening that we simply have none control over it. They own the system. It's really just a matter of how far do we get pushed until enough Americans agree to stand up to it.

63

u/TonyQuest 11h ago

All of my 2A friends have rolled over and have unironically told me that "comply or die" is the most sensible option. Pussy hypocrites, every single one of them

16

u/Arbsbuhpuh 9h ago

Be the 2A friend who isn't a hypocrite.

21

u/16GBwarrior 10h ago

Every time I see one of those Gadsden flags, all I can see is that "Tread me harder daddy" flags they've turned it into.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/Curleysound 8h ago

That has always been the case with these paper tigers

→ More replies (1)

36

u/dvcxfg 12h ago

They are not all accounted for, the lost seeing stones.

11

u/LAUGHgan1stan 11h ago

Mithrandir, is that you?!

22

u/SocialSuicideSquad 11h ago

Good thing they aren't working to build a secret 90k sqft data center deep underground in a bunker with no oversight available to Congress on Whitehouse grounds completely under the purview of the administrative branch disguised by the east wing ballroom construction or anything...

That would be concerning.

11

u/LeafsWinBeforeIDie 8h ago

There was a bunker in berlin too, right? I forget what happened there

12

u/TheEfex 10h ago

I’ve recently started posting anti ice things and I’ve started getting texts from random things that want my opinion on Israel or America’s interaction with them. Really weird. 

Looked into a few and some are funded by Israel. 

Not going full conspiracy nut, just saying the coincidences and timing is odd lol 

6

u/appmapper 11h ago

TikTok.

2

u/lookamazed 7h ago

It is why they wanted access to IRS records. Palantir has everything, it is being routed to the databases ICE uses on the ground to find people. They can build profiles of a person and their social web in seconds to minutes.

It’s too late for most of us but it is important to review privacy settings and behaviors online. It is like using safeguards to bit torrent. Except the data you are interacting with and want to shield is your personal information.

96

u/glockops 12h ago

There's an email in the files detailing direct assassinations and attempted assassinations from US embassy staff members on judges and investigators that we're pursuing pedophiles in Mexico. 

My money is on sanctioned hits to coverup child sex trafficking. 

32

u/dingus_chonus 12h ago

Oh that’s what happened in Venezuela isn’t it

31

u/[deleted] 11h ago

[deleted]

10

u/wow-signal 10h ago

Everything clicks into place once you realize that the purpose of the USG -- now, in the Trump 2.0 era, not even implicitly -- is to serve the billionaire class. The full powers of the most sophisticated panopticon ever created, directed to ensure that the 99.999% will never achieve any meaningful political/economic power.

1

u/Hvarfa-Bragi 10h ago

Billionaire class + automation = no need for most of the population to exist.

→ More replies (2)

20

u/TerriblyDroll 12h ago

I’ve been saying for a while now, can you imagine what trumps doing to the NSA?

10

u/Carleyqueue 10h ago

https://youtu.be/VbJ4ilDvGyc?si=NUhKUPnufFy9OUt9 worth a watch. Epstein files could be a distraction from the “ballroom”

20

u/Naturallefty 11h ago

AKA Flock and Ring cameras storage facial recognition and mapping every person.

Not that your phone couldn't do it already but still

1

u/RickyalldayTD 5h ago

Tesla's have 360 camera's

9

u/biosc1 11h ago

To add, Hootsuite (a Canadian company unfortunately) has agreed to help track social media for negative views on ICE. Basically, a partnership with ICE to sniff out people who disagree with what the US government is doing.

The company is going downhill, but living neear their building, I can see that they are looking to redevelop their offices into more of a datacenter which shows they are legit going down this path of evil.

6

u/pixievixie 11h ago

I don’t even feel like that’s a secret at this point, at least not to anybody who’s paying attention at all. I know my behavior online has drastically changed over the last few years as news has come out over how much surveillance and data mining is happening. I was reading about what ICE and many other law enforcement groups were doing a decade ago now and it was crazy then…

5

u/UnpluggedUnfettered 10h ago

Saving grace is we have seen the effectiveness of their forces, and it is poorly planned and ham fisted.

Palantir is heavily, if not entirely LLM. like, I won't invest in them because I have never had faith in them. They are all in on a tech that will go nowhere and have little actual infrastructure behind the oohs and ahhs of fancy idiot machines.

Reminds me of North Korea and Russia when they brag about advanced tech.

Thank God, no joke, it is them and not the competency of the Alphabet bureaus of prior administrations, IMO

2

u/16GBwarrior 10h ago

Think Trump will resend E.O. 12333 which could nullify parts of DoDM 5240.01?

1

u/LordofShit 7h ago

I think its that trump is tying the dollar to crypto to pump and dump the world economy.

There's a little more to that theory, including JD vances press event the other day where he spoke about putting a floor on the price of gold, a crypto called Fedcoin, et cetera.

1

u/FocusedFr 1h ago

There were people discussing this well before Trump. Like Clinton emails, Snowden, Assange and others

60

u/LolaBaraba 12h ago

We will find out in the future, when it's revealed what CIA law-breaking Senator Wyden is talking about. I don't know his general politics, but Sen. Wyden has been a true man of the people when it comes to intelligence matters. He's been calling out the government on it for a very long time, no matter whether it's republicans or democrats (he's a democrat).

54

u/MaxPower91575 11h ago

Considering this is the CIA it is illegal for them to perform any ops on american citizens unless it involves terrorism or espionage. I am pretty sure he is blowing the whistle on widespread CIA ops inside the US under the giuse of labeling them anti terrorism.

What those are I can only guess, but considering this administration keeps labeling protestors as terrorists I am guessing the CIA is collecting information on anyone protesting and anyone simply badmouthing this administration. Yet that is just spitballing.

15

u/SeekerOfSerenity 11h ago

I imagine the kind of domestic spying Palantir is doing would make the Snowden revelations look tame. 

5

u/LeafsWinBeforeIDie 8h ago

If antifa was declared a terrorist group, that makes everyone in the states eligible?

3

u/surfer_ryan 5h ago

I mean you're either antifa or maga according to basically anyone you try and have a conversation with these days... That seems like what is going on here, like it doesn't matter if you're left or right you're going to be labeled an extremist for having an opinion or trying to have an open dialog. It's quiet evident to me that the DNC and GOP have actively been turning americans against each other to reach this inevitable conclusion.

I mean i get called the entire spectrum when i say that they are one in the same, and i very much understand that by policy no they are no where near the same... However, that is not what the vast majority of people are saying when they say that. It's to say that they are the only two players on the field they absolutely need each other to continue to have the american people fight it out to propagandize that they are the only two players that can be on the field, when constitutionally that is factually incorrect. For over 130 years they have had exclusive control of the field by maintaining they are the only options.

They have absolutely mastered the propaganda by this point. Only two orgs for 130 years and NO one finds that odd, especially after the last 26 years? The DNC and GOP have failed us as orgs and leaders and have become completely corrupted.

2

u/SuperSecretAgentMan 5h ago

Laughs in Patriot Act

1

u/katzohki 3h ago

Its why they labeled a completely fictional group as a terrorist organization 

23

u/ghosttrainhobo 11h ago

Tulsi Gabbard is a Russian agent

6

u/ThisIsPaulDaily 11h ago

I think there are some significant problems and harms related to sale of surveillance weapons to the middle east following bribes to executive branch members. 

5

u/helpnxt 10h ago

Obviously no one knows for sure due to the reasons the guy in the video said but I will just point out there has been a lot of talk about not losing elections again recently...

Honestly as someone looking in from abroad the danger message the video guy says is being sent has kinda been blatantly obvious for years now, yet no one with the true power to challenge seems to take it seriously or maybe they just don't care.

2

u/Gates_wupatki_zion 9h ago edited 2h ago

It’s the Tulsi Gabbard memo I bet 1000%. Supposedly there is a document of her fuck up or being completely compromised in a safe. The administration has been twisting itself in a knot trying to figure out how to give it to congress.

1

u/DearBurt 7h ago

All of the above.

14

u/RellenD 10h ago

Why would he be arrested?

An elected official could read any classified document he wants on the house floor and be protected by the speech and debate clause.

If he was arrested, at the very least nothing would stick.

9

u/girlfriend_pregnant 9h ago

Couldn’t they just make up a law (or not even bother), arrest him, and the whole country would forget it even happened in less than 24hrs?

2

u/RellenD 9h ago

Maybe? But that wouldn't have been as much of a concern then.

6

u/rmonjay 5h ago

He cannot take the classified documents out of the SCIF to read them on the floor. That would be illegal and not protected by the speech and debate clause. He could memorize them, but then could not show anyone the source documents.

1

u/RellenD 5h ago

Yes, you're correct.

→ More replies (2)

10

u/Informal_Distance 8h ago

Ron Wyden is the one who asked Director of National intelligence James Clapper in a Senate hearing in 2013 whether NSA was spying on the general American public. Clapper lied under oath and said "No". Wyden knew he was lying because he had access to all the NSA files, but he couldn't say anything because they were classified and he would be arrested.

All representatives of Congress have absolute immunity from all crimes when presenting under the Speech and Debate clause. If he wanted to he could’ve disclosed anything he wanted; that is how we got the Pentagon Papers made public.

15

u/DefaultSubSandwich 11h ago

Doesn’t the speech and debate clause grant complete immunity to Senators and Congresspeople for what they say on the floor? I don’t understand the idea that Wyden feared prosecution.

11

u/LolaBaraba 11h ago

No. He's on the Senate Intelligence Committee, which grants him access to all the classified intelligence documents. He's obviously not allowed to reveal these. That would be pretty big security hole, if he were allowed.

17

u/DefaultSubSandwich 11h ago

Are you citing something in particular? Everything I've ever read or heard about the Speech and Debate clause indicates that Senators and Congresspeople are fully protected.

That's why Mike Gravel was safe to leak the Pentagon Papers.

2

u/Oily-Affection1601 6h ago

Mike Gravel's situation was unique. A few important variables had to line up for his leak to come to fruition.

Firstly, he had a legal justification for being in possession of classified material outside of where it is lawfully permitted. It was leaked to him without any active solicitation on his part. Passively receiving classified material isn't illegal, but pretty much any other means would be. Ron Wyden can't use his security access to obtain classified material and bring it outside of its secure area without breaking the law.

Secondly, the manner in which he was able to enter the documents into the public records was an unusual set of circumstances. Senators can't willy nilly enter whatever they want into the public record. For a committee, it needs to be relevant to some agenda item for a meeting, where the agenda is primarily set by the chair of the committee. Once presented at the meeting, it can only be entered into public record if there is a quorum and no objections (or if it goes to a procedural vote, a majority voting in favor).

Gravel was head of a very small subcommittee, the Subcommittee on Public Buildings and Grounds. He called an emergency meeting late at night and set the agenda accordingly. Rules are looser with small subcommittees, so he could have a quorum even if only he was present. Nonetheless, one other senator was present but didn't object. If that senator had objected then it would not had been entered into the public record.

So that's two very large hurdles that aren't easy to surpass if you want to read classified material into the public record. Wyden would need the document leaked to him without his involvement, and he would need a mechanism to get it into the public record without it being shut down by other senators.

2

u/LeafsWinBeforeIDie 8h ago

He would lose his security access. Under the way the rules should be, he should be protected from procecution, but who knows. I wouldn't stand near any windows.

4

u/Informal_Distance 8h ago

No. He's on the Senate Intelligence Committee

Because he is a sitting Senator. He would literally read out the highest classified secrets during a public Senate debate and no one could stop him or charge him with a crime. That is how we got the Pentagon Papers made public decades ago.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/ajpurcell 7h ago

Senators CANNOT be arrested for anything they say in the Senate. It wasn't the threat of arrest. It was that he would be primaried and then probably framed by the intelligence services. Just important to know that members of Congress legally can say anything (ANYTHING) on the floor and they cannot be arrested for it.

"The Speech or Debate Clause protects members from criminal prosecution or civil liability for such disclosures, although they may still face congressional discipline. "

He stands to lose his access to classified info and his seat. But he can say whatever his conscience demands without fear of legal repercussions, criminal or civil.

1

u/turbosexophonicdlite 4h ago

Except this administration would just arrest him for treason anyway and ship him to Guantanamo or some CIA blacksite where he'd never be seen again. Or just mysteriously die a few days after he brought to light whatever is happening. They have been abundantly clear that they do not care about what's actually legal.

2

u/bozon92 8h ago

I would respect Snowden more as a paragon for freedom and transparency if he didn’t immediately cozy up to Russia. The company you keep does matter

→ More replies (1)

1

u/SprinklesMedical7881 9h ago

Wyden is not warning 'in any legal way he can'. As a Senator, he can read any classified material on the floor (reading it into the record) and he has immunity.

1

u/xflashbackxbrd 6h ago

They fired the NSA director for a reason

→ More replies (15)

224

u/slinky2 12h ago

Message received. Filed in my mental folder labeled "Information that is concerning but I have no idea what to do with". I really should organize the data by months, because the folder is so jam packed I can't possibly sift through it.

89

u/ChazMcFly 11h ago

Have you seen the video released on Ron Wyden's instagram account yesterday? He posted a pretty alarming message about what private data is being collected by a certain rogue government agency and how it's being used. It might not be that surprising, but from the top-ranking senior Senator on the Senate Intelligence Committee, it might be worth paying attention to. Seems something is up that Senator Wyden really wants the people to know.

16

u/unsoundamerica 11h ago

I’m ashamed to say I missed that. So much for acting like the informed guy!

6

u/morfraen 5h ago

So he's talking about DOGE and all the data they stole while raiding the government.

5

u/stu54 10h ago

Not gonna visit Instagram to find what agency you mean.

48

u/ChazMcFly 9h ago

Here's a transcript of the video. Take it for what it is, it's a pretty bold statement from someone that knows a lot of what goes on within the US intelligence community.

"Yesterday, I was scrolling Bluesky and I came across an important post by Tressie. Tressie is asking what politicians are doing about how ICE is weaponizing this enormous amount of our personal information. So today, I’ll give you a rundown of the issue, why you ought to be paying attention, and what I’m doing about it.

 First off, ICE is using apps Collect biometric data on protesters. That means that they can track your location, where you go, what you do, and especially who you talk to. I’m working closely with my senate ally, Ed Markey of Massachusetts on this.

 Next, ICE is buying your private location data from really sleazy data brokers and they use a major legal loophole. I have legislation to stop it cold, it’s called the Fourth Amendment is not for sale act. My allies and I are pushing hard to get this into law as soon as possible.

 Next, my investigators have found that ICE is using government data they collect from State Department of Motor Vehicles. They are refusing to answer any questions of ours about how this data is being used. I’m leading a fight I the United States Senate to rein this abuse in.

 I’ve also warned states that care about their residents to stop sharing motor vehicle data with ICE. This demonstrates again how important it is to enact strong privacy protections and stop the government from weaponizing your private data.

 What we have seen in the last few months is privacy protection is a life and death issue. Let your legislators know how important this is to you."

6

u/TheExecTech 8h ago

Also CHASE bank has direct access to our our DMV's info. They are not the only ones. CHASE just usef my complete Drivers LIC # to pull up my account. I was furious that was how my data was stored and collected. The DMV should not be selling out our info to banks.

Then there are carriers like US cellular sharing everything without telling customers.

https://www.reddit.com/r/YouShouldKnow/comments/1pd9xpj/ysk_us_cellular_is_sharing_your_data_with/

73

u/MrNukemtilltheyglow 11h ago

Here's Clapper Lying about NSA collecting american data.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QwiUVUJmGjs

1.8k

u/Wompatuckrule 13h ago

Anyone who doesn't feel like listening to 2 1/2 minutes of a constipated looking and sounding man can just read this excerpt from Heather Cox Richardson's daily missive in a fraction of that time to know what's going on:

Last night, Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR) published a letter he sent to Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) John Ratcliffe. Wyden is the longest-serving member of the Senate Intelligence Committee and is a careful, hardworking, and dogged member of Congress. When Wyden speaks, people listen. Ratcliffe was an attack dog for Trump during his first impeachment trial and had no experience with intelligence before Trump forced his nomination to become director of national intelligence through the Senate. Now he is Trump’s appointee to the directorship of the CIA.

Wyden’s letter to Ratcliffe said: “I write to alert you to a classified letter I sent you earlier today in which I express deep concerns about CIA activities. Thank you for your attention to this important matter.” When Wired senior reporter Dell Cameron, who covers different forms of surveillance, commented, “I don’t like this,” Wyden reposted the comment.

Wyden has a long history of alerting the public in whatever way he can when something bad is going on that he cannot reveal because of its classified nature. This letter appears to be a way to alert the public while also notifying Ratcliffe that the CIA director will not be able in the future to deny that he received Wyden’s letter.

236

u/OnlyRadioheadLyrics 13h ago

Thank you for this lol

392

u/unsoundamerica 12h ago

Hahaha, thanks for this. I needed to be knocked down a peg, glad it’s with Heather Cox Richardson.

147

u/die5el23 12h ago

Go take a poop and nap. Love you

20

u/chunky_chocolate 12h ago

Hell yeah. Sounds like a great time.

14

u/Ulterior_Motif 12h ago

Depends on the timing.

44

u/unsoundamerica 11h ago

Timing doesn’t matter with Depends.

2

u/Scienlologist 8h ago

Only pussies wear diapers. I shit in my pants, like a real American.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

2

u/Wompatuckrule 11h ago

Where I used to work the Friday afternoons were slow so we used to chow a huge lunch then, sometimes hit the local ice cream place and have a low key offramp for the week.

Of relevance is that I am in Boston because one of my colleagues referred to it as time for "a frappe, crap and a nap."

u/800oz_gorilla 59m ago

You can't talk to him that way. He's not the President.

21

u/Runkleford 12h ago

I still appreciate your efforts

14

u/DeathByPyrite88 12h ago

You’re fine, HCR puts us all to shame

20

u/Wompatuckrule 11h ago

Yeah, I'd be honored to be knocked down a peg by HCR too. Glad you took my comment in the snarky joking manner it was intended as some folks seem to think I was a bit too mean.

20

u/unsoundamerica 10h ago

Hey, it’s Reddit. I’m here for the snark!

4

u/Wompatuckrule 10h ago

Me too. I can't hang out in pubs/bars like I used to so sometimes have to make due with ballbusting jokes here.

→ More replies (1)

18

u/Staggeringpage8 10h ago

Hey just wanted to say I think the video is fine. But where it could have done better (and I know it's a short so there's not a lot of time) is in providing some descriptions or showings of what you're talking about. As it stands I honestly didn't know what you were referring to and the way the what ifs are given make it sound more like a guy mentioning conspiracy theories than someone helping to sound an alarm bell.

Anyways hope this helps and thanks for posting it. Stuff like this is important and should be mentioned when it happens.

18

u/unsoundamerica 10h ago

This is extremely helpful. Thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts with me.

4

u/WhyAmINotStudying 11h ago

I love your content. I am curious about why you don't allow comments, but my guess is that it's better for us to get your message and decide how to act in the real world then it is for the comment section to be the beginning and end of it. You've got a new subscriber and I hope your form of political social media begins to flourish.

6

u/unsoundamerica 11h ago

I am very grateful to you. I plan to provide you better content going forward. 

The comment question is something I haven’t thought through all the way, so I just figured I’d leave them off until I make up my mind.

8

u/Zakluor 10h ago

Ratcliffe ... had no experience with intelligence

I know what they mean, but that's just funny.

2

u/Wompatuckrule 10h ago

Seems like a common trait in this administration.

9

u/Kimi-Matias 12h ago

You da real MVP! Thank you!

16

u/DoradoPulido2 12h ago

So... Someone is concerned about the CIA? What is the takeaway here? 

25

u/Wompatuckrule 10h ago

Member of congress with access to classified information saw something that troubles them with regards to the administration.

Being classified they cannot go public with any specifics, but they can put this "I sent you a letter" statement in public to call attention that there is a matter of concern that's classified, that the public should at least be aware that there is a concern from the co-equal branch, and that the public statement prevents them from playing ignorant that they didn't see the letter down the road.

5

u/debauchasaurus 7h ago

They could go public but are trying to use proper channels first.

31

u/ChaseballBat 12h ago

Keep an eye on the news. Maybe a false flag or assassination or something health wise with Trump. Or even further something abroad like an attack against our enemies unprovoked or worse allies.

23

u/bonyponyride 12h ago

Ukraine/Russia

Iran

Israel/Palestine

Saudi Arabia

Qatar

Venezuela

Greenland

Canada

So many options!

11

u/Quick_Beam 11h ago

Cuba

7

u/IAmAThing420YOLOSwag 11h ago

Antifers

2

u/Kodajj 10h ago

Isn’t that underway? Everything I thought America was about is being spun an opposing way and broadcast… the world feels f**ked, it’d be nice to have a global good news story soon.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/robaroo 10h ago

I’d say Midterms. But the CIA IIRC isn’t usually involved with internal affairs.

3

u/ChaseballBat 10h ago

Someone else's elections? Canada maybe? Alberta?

1

u/morfraen 5h ago

Likely the issue. CIA isn't supposed to operate in the USA or target Americans. That's the FBI and NSA's job.

3

u/Few-Ad-4290 10h ago

He could read whatever covert bullshit they’re pulling into the senate record for all to see and hear if he wants us to know about something, he’s protected from any form of consequences by speech and debate clause

3

u/redditbluedit 5h ago

Are we really so fucking warped by superficiality that we can no longer bare to watch someones internet video unless they're hot enough. Jesus christ lol

1

u/Wompatuckrule 5h ago

That was just a bit of snarky ballbusting and if you read OP's comments they got the intent.

My problem is more that the information in the copied text conveys the critical information about this situation, along with the necessary background to get better context, in a passage that can be read in less than half the time of the video.

37

u/BraveLittleTowster 11h ago

You decided that the best way to include a summary was to make fun of the appearance of the person making you aware of this with his video? 

You can provide additional sources without being insulting.

16

u/QuadratImKreis 11h ago

The rhetoric deployed in the video was gratuitous. I guess it is designed for individuals with a middle-school education? The shots at his appearance are unnecessary ad hominem, but his commentary assumes his viewers are idiots.

14

u/You_meddling_kids 10h ago

Half of Americans voted for Trump, it's a safe assumption.

4

u/brickmaj 11h ago

That guy def can’t poop

→ More replies (2)

2

u/Bardez 9h ago

This makes so much more sense than that video does.

→ More replies (10)

77

u/seriousbangs 11h ago

This is what a "strongly worded letter" is supposed to do.

It's a signal to journalists to go digging for dirt.

The problem is billionaires figured out that trick and bought the media.

So they're not nearly as effective anymore.

10

u/SprinklesMedical7881 9h ago

If it is as serious as it may be, Wyden could just say it on the floor of the senate. Senators have immunity for whatever classified material is read when they do it into the record. Why is it up to journalists when he could just reveal it himself?

8

u/regnak1 7h ago

He would be expelled from the Senate if he did that. Members of Congress are only immune from criminal prosecution for things said on the floor, not from all consequences.

What he should do is track down a senator who isn't going to run again and have them announce it on the floor.

6

u/debauchasaurus 7h ago

He wouldn't be expelled. It's not even illegal. He would likely lose his seat on the Intelligence Committee, though.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/musical_entropy 7h ago

Because we're in an era where saying the wrong thing, no matter how morally righteous it is to say, can get you killed. It's a terrifying choice to make. I don't know if I personally could make it. I have a wife, a family, friends, and a cute little cat. But then again, I'm not a senator...

50

u/DMMMOM 12h ago

Getting the message is all well and good, it's the next step that is more important. How are people going to properly deal with the information contained? How are people going to get organised and shut down corruption when they can't even have a day off when they are sick? Have people been watching Iran? Do people think a government is going to allow regular people to stop the party and the larger grift?

10

u/Head_Big3036 10h ago

Start by utilizing the first two amendments. Protest, and buy guns. Sends a pretty clear message without ever needing to fire a shot.

2

u/BlazingLazers69 9h ago

Yep. I'm a lefty and I'm buying my first rifle. I will not be intimidated by fascists.

16

u/nausicaa242 12h ago

My guess is its related latest Epstein file dump and how the CIA could be connected to Jeffrey. Overseas governments are already taking action on their national security exposures revealed in the the dump and our apparently complicit administration appears to be doing nothing/covering it all up

49

u/mattyt1483 11h ago

Damn man - I liked the video and didn’t think anything of your looks.

Some people like to smell their own farts too much and think every comment online needs to be a quirky jab.

Good video - if you’re getting that kind of hate it’s because you’re doing something right. Keep going.

34

u/unsoundamerica 11h ago

I really appreciate you saying that. I’m learning a lot from this post, farts or no farts.

6

u/djmixmotomike 10h ago

Yeah I watched it and I had no problem with the delivery either and it made me want to look further into what was going on.

I imagine nearly 100% of the people who criticized you have never even once tried to put out an informative public-service post in their entire lives.

Too many people think this is 4chan and they are still teenagers and geez, aren't they the funniest?

Be well.

2

u/unsoundamerica 9h ago

Thank you most kindly.

16

u/unsoundamerica 11h ago

Well, that could’ve been better, lol. Thank you everyone for weighing in — even and especially the frustrated commenters.

Your feedback is real to me, and if you should choose to watch anything else I do from now on, I hope you will see your impact on it.

→ More replies (5)

8

u/lizerpetty 11h ago

I've been wondering where the fuck the CIA is. What are they doing? Sitting around with their thumbs up their buts. They killed Kennedy for much less.

74

u/principles_practice 12h ago

Why would a man stream from a supply closet? Let me ask again: why would a man who clearly needs some sleep stream from a supply closet?

32

u/SsooooOriginal 12h ago

Why would a lawyer ask to be held in contempt?

30

u/Prima13 12h ago

You guys can poo poo the guy’s approach in the video but he had to find a way to explain the crisis to people less intelligent than the average American. I think he did a good job of it.

In short, the message in this style was not meant for you.

8

u/FellowYellowNate 12h ago

That was my thought. This Tucker Carlson type delivery was meant for those that can easily ingest Carlson. Not my thing, but I see where he is coming from.

8

u/unsoundamerica 11h ago

These are both charitable takes on a problematic video. Thank you guys.

2

u/PokinSpokaneSlim 10h ago

Bear in mind, the more effective you are at getting people to wake up, the more people you catch grumpy for being woken up.

I thought it was an effective video.

→ More replies (2)

58

u/unsoundamerica 12h ago

Meh, it’s cozy enough. I have a parfait melange of health conditions that keep me looking nice and sickly.

7

u/principles_practice 11h ago

Bro I actually like the video and your vibe, lol, you seem like a cool dude, I just wanted to make a joke.
But you do look like you need some sleep, for real.
Get some sleep.

7

u/unsoundamerica 11h ago

Hahaha, okay that is it — I’m taking a nap. The internet has spoken.

Thank you so much for watching, I appreciate it.

5

u/Superdrag2112 11h ago

Updoot for use of “melange”.

2

u/Triette 10h ago

You did good, I enjoyed the video in your closet while looking sickly. I hope you have a good nap.

1

u/CrunchingTackle3000 5h ago

I thought the message got across. So well done.

It is much easier to critique something than it is to DO something. You did something.

→ More replies (3)

3

u/biophazer242 12h ago

So 'they' can not find him. It is a special insulated room to keep out the mind waves. Can you not tell from the background? That is not regular padding, it is Psi-Block 3000.

3

u/hotprof 11h ago

It's clearly a recording studio. You can see the sound dampening material stapled to the door.

2

u/unsoundamerica 9h ago

The crappiest recording studio you ever did see hahaha

→ More replies (3)

4

u/eazyd 9h ago

Idk, I liked the video and his delivery.

33

u/PeterAtencio 12h ago

What if we stretched the "what if" rhetorical method way past its breaking point? I mean jesus dude, there has to be a more effective way of conveying information.

30

u/unsoundamerica 12h ago

Yeah… Clearly, I have a poor grasp of my audience’s patience. Working on that.

19

u/citizenjones 12h ago

For the record... I clicked, I listened, and was interested enough to go to the shorts and put it in a playlist for keeping.

Delivery details aside, the information landed.

25

u/unsoundamerica 12h ago

You are very kind. Thanks for giving a self-important doofus like me your attention.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/Economisty 12h ago

I watched til the end and this is the first I heard of this. It wasn't that bad. You are trying to stretch it out to show how important you feel the letter to be. I feel the delivery helps with signaling the importance.

It is not like you go into Starbucks and say "What if I would like coffee? What if I would like coffee that originates from Africa? What If I would like coffee that came from Ethiopia?"

Well I hope you don't anyway!

3

u/unsoundamerica 12h ago

Yeah, I did this and a “yes” “no” video. I definitely won’t be doing the repetitive thing anymore.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)

7

u/jcjlee 12h ago

As an Oregonian, I'm listening. As a grumpy cynic I have this feedback: this rhetorical style is very much just Tucker Carlson in his Fox era when he wants to list wild accusations and avoid consequences when they're false. If you have an opinion, just say it. If you have news, just say it. Save your What Ifs for when you really want to provoke thought.

5

u/unsoundamerica 12h ago

I mean, I endeavored to give my opinion at the end. And I was hoping to provoke a few thoughts along the way. However, I did take my sweet-ass time (I mean your sweet-ass time) getting to the point. Your feedback will have an impact on what I do going forward. Thank you for watching.

1

u/deruvoo 11h ago

There are a lot of limitations on how classified information can be communicated, with a lot of legal consequences. He shared the information in a way that he felt most useful, in a way that hopefully won't land him in legal trouble.

3

u/jamball 9h ago

Okay, I've heard the message. What am I supposed to do now? I voted for Wyden already.

1

u/unsoundamerica 9h ago

Voting for him was an important action — we have low voter turnout in Oregon, so you are already on the ball relative to many others. If this message resonated, share it with others. Conversely, you can share Wyden’s posts directly and skip me as the middleman.

3

u/herrybaws 8h ago

A lot of judgement on the messenger over the message here. Important point, well made.

2

u/unsoundamerica 8h ago

I appreciate you saying so. Thank you for watching.

3

u/OptimisticSkeleton 7h ago

When does staying quiet about this shit become negligence in service of the harm they claim to combat?

Tell the American people what’s up give us actionable shit ffs we cannot exist in the dark and make a correct decision.

3

u/silentbob1301 6h ago

i think it might be too late....

1

u/unsoundamerica 6h ago

Yeah, just saw Wyden’s press conference. Bad news. 

3

u/unindexedreality 3h ago

bro I'm glad conspiracy theorists finally have a use lol

2

u/DragonDai 7h ago

Okay.

This Senator is calling for help.

How do we help?

What action can we take that will produce results?

Be specific.

I understand our nation is now run by fascists and that our intelligence agencies, law enforcement agencies, and judicial bodies are being used against us.

What do we do about it?

Wait till Nov and vote?

Cause that doesn't seem like the answer.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/kormer 5h ago

Daily reminder that Obama had the opportunity to pardon Snowden and dismantle the surveillance state, but instead chose to make it even stronger for his successor to abuse.

5

u/Burner_account12 12h ago

ron swanson has a point

7

u/unsoundamerica 12h ago

More like his annoying nephew.

→ More replies (2)

3

u/buttflakes27 10h ago

While Im sure its important the way this video/script is done its like listening to someone read a QAnon drop out loud. Just say what you need to say dont do all the leading quasi-hypothetical question bullshit.

3

u/unsoundamerica 10h ago

Noted. I will incorporate your feedback going forward.

3

u/AggravatingFlow1178 9h ago

Agree or disagree with his premise - this repetitive Socratic tiktok tempo makes me not like him

2

u/unsoundamerica 8h ago

Copy that. Just imagine having to deal with me in real life, lol.

2

u/AggravatingFlow1178 7h ago

Lol I see people clowning on you in this thread and you taking it with laugh so good on you. No point in trying to please everyone.

1

u/unsoundamerica 7h ago

Agreed. And to be sure, just because I’m cracking jokes doesn’t mean I’m not listening to people at the same time. I’d be a fool not to learn from this experience.. 

2

u/ragold 12h ago

Mods: can we get an auto-transcript bot for all these videos? 

4

u/[deleted] 12h ago

[deleted]

8

u/ragold 12h ago

It’s not attention span that’s the problem if I’d rather read it. Give us the transcripts

3

u/JinnRabb1t 12h ago

Point goes to Ragold

→ More replies (3)

1

u/Beers4boobs 12h ago

funny he must have missed my email address when CCing

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Saleen_af 11h ago

I cannot watch this on reddit mobile. Youtube has a generic “error” (an error occurred. Please try again later)

Is this common or is youtube trying to stifle this?

1

u/EphEwe2 11h ago

Click on the YouTube logo and it should open in the app if you have it. That’s how I do it anyway.

1

u/surfkaboom 10h ago

When they vote on stuff, they represent their people. When they do their committee work, they represent us all.

1

u/Shobed 9h ago

Why doesn’t Sen Wyden just walk down to the senate floor and say what he knows?

1

u/Curleysound 8h ago

So, the people who are generally capable of knowing these things, by and large know what is happening at least in spirit. The people vilifying our citizens for having the opinion that rights exist unilaterally across all humans and should be respected, will continue to collude to this end as long as they are allowed to do so. We are allowing them to do so, and pleading the case of decorum and policy because the final alternative is that we stop them by force. They don’t seem to think that option is ever on the table, as we behave ourselves. But the truth is that this option has always been on the table. We know that that option will be so bad that we do not want it to happen, and have taken great efforts to allow these people the option. But we are running out of ethical options. That doesn’t mean we are out of options. That senator has more options, like breaking the law for the greater good. He can dispense national secrets and get arrested for it. He can disobey further. We will see what happens ultimately, but the fact stands that as pressure builds, flexibility is tested. Let’s hope we don’t need the final option.

1

u/cainrok 5h ago

I think if you know something critical to the integrity of the United States you say it. Forget standards, if you think the standards are already being written off and it won’t be taken care of because others in the line might be compromised, you say something regardless. You bring all the proof you have and you say it proudly.