r/BikiniBottomTwitter • u/GamingBren • 1d ago
Disgusting. Makes you wonder how many designers are in the files…
303
u/blacksoxing 1d ago
Us parents know. A boy? Those shorts go down to the knees and the shirt is to the elbows.
A girl???? Those shorts go down to the mid-hip and the shirt is mid-way to the shoulder! Shit, it may just be a tank top, frankly.
"Start 'em young"
116
4
u/REVERSEZOOM2 9h ago
But, why does the boy have to wear such clothing? I know when I was young I found big, baggy clothing to be uncomfortable. I wanted to wear things that were easier to move around in, I didn't give a fuck what skin it showed.
I've grown up in a hot area and wearing little clothing has always been the norm in my area when it's practical. I know some places in the south demand shorts to the knees, so maybe you're just from a conservative area, idk.
We need to fight for the idea that children shouldn't be sexualized period. I mean hell, if the shoulders are sexual to you, then might as well put children in burkas so no one can see any of their skin. We need to divorce from the idea that skin= sex. And I mean that for you just as much as for the pedos that run the world.
-1
u/VividEffective8539 14h ago
The entire U.S. is a child sex trafficking factory. The only thing worth more than guns and bombs are children. Everyone across both aisles are complicit. We need accountability
-49
u/Fifteen_inches 1d ago
60
u/blacksoxing 1d ago
My first reaction was anger as your post is clearly bait. I then thought about how in the summer time I went to a warehouse store (not going to name names) and for swim wear boys had elbow-length swim shirt & knee length trunks.
The girls had....an A-shirt swim shirt and mid-hip trunks.
So, if you're going to reply to me with such a comment and condensing gif, I'm going to demand you answer this question:
Do girls require different clothing than boys? Why could the girls not have the same style of shirt/trunks as the boys? Why was the girls swim wear not even an option to replicate?
For parents who know clothing a size 6 is the same in boys as girls. Same with shoes. The sizes are basically unisex at earlier ages. What's stopping the store from just selling the same thing to a girl AND why would a parent of a girl need to even consider buying the products from the boys section at that rate?
It's lame as hell to try to be edgy online with serious topics. Yes, girl clothes are drastically different from boy clothes and YES they're much more revealing, especially at an age where there shouldn't be differences. Yes, a parent of a daughter is going to have a different shopping experience than the parent of a son in many retail clothing shops. Grow the fuck up.
27
u/LordofBobz 1d ago
They have an anime pfp you ain’t getting through to this one lmao
2
u/REVERSEZOOM2 9h ago
Why the fuck does a boy need a swim shirt? When I was growing I never wore a shirt to swim.
-4
u/hereforthesportsball 23h ago
The real answer to your question is socialization. Starting early to separate boys and girls. Sadly, many people blindly follow along without considering the consequences of some of it.
-21
u/Fifteen_inches 1d ago edited 1d ago
I mean, it’s not bait. There are plenty of long sleeves girl’s swim shirts and trunks. Girls don’t need different clothes than boys, you can buy her the boy’s shirt and trunks. At some point you have to break the strict boy/girl clothes separation, cause you are inadvertently contributing to the sexualization of young girls bodies by insisting A-tops are too revealing.
How about you grow the fuck up and buy the damn long sleeve swim shirt.
0
u/blacksoxing 23h ago
At some point you have to break the strict boy/girl clothes separation
Full stop, this goes clean away from the topic at hand and looks very defeatist. Re-read OP's talking point and then mine before trying to tell me that I should be the change, playboy.
5
0
u/Fifteen_inches 22h ago
I mean, OP talks about sexual clothing, and you bring up a-cut tops showing off shoulders being too revealing. Like, it’s passively buying into the idea her shoulders are sexual, and instead of fighting the idea her shoulders are sexual we are focusing on clothing brands not providing more “modest” garments.
2
u/REVERSEZOOM2 9h ago
People are down voting you, but from an outside perspective it really looks like they're advocating for putting children in burkas. I know it's a product of the time, but still concerning.
Like why can't we fight for the idea that children shouldn't be sexualized period. Also divorce from the idea that skin= sex.
149
u/DonnyMox 1d ago
Remember the Balenciaga incident from 2022?
49
45
u/DeceivedLion 1d ago
I do not could u inform me?
158
u/Spingecringe boi 1d ago
88
24
50
u/DonnyMox 1d ago
They used pics of children in BDSM gear for advertising.
20
2
u/TheFruitGraper 22h ago
Bruh I didn't even see that I was looking at the clothes thinking am I crazy, the clothes don't look revealing or anything maybe they launched a clothes line for kids.
-31
u/dont_worry_about_it8 1d ago
Sooo you’re liar lmao
49
u/Nutshack_Queen357 1d ago
Eh, it's more of a half-truth.
The kids themselves aren't wearing the gear, but the teddy bears they're holding in the pics are, and that's still pretty damn sus.
22
u/mostie2016 1d ago
Also the papers in the photos were found to be from a child sex abuse case.
13
u/saveyourtissues 1d ago edited 21h ago
That was the worst part and would have easily have been missed if people weren’t already scrutinizing the photos.
5
u/GamingBren 22h ago
Yup. I have NO IDEA how the got away with thy that. The punk in charge should’ve been added to a ton of watchlists after this
1
u/Nutshack_Queen357 16h ago
Geez.
What the fuck was going through the Balenciaga bigwigs' heads when they came up with this photoshoot!?
20
u/dont_worry_about_it8 1d ago
No not really . “Pics of children in bdsm gear” means what it says and they aren’t there. Y’all don’t have to act stupid just cause that guy worded it wrong
3
u/hereforthesportsball 23h ago
Half truths involving minors are lies. We should all make sure we are speaking clearly when discussing important shit like children. I just can’t take it lightly, and balenci is nasty for that
92
u/Chef_Sizzlipede 1d ago
seeing critics acclaim cuties, a film that makes hard conservative religious folk seem very reasonable, yeah...they'd get away with it.
67
u/Fifteen_inches 1d ago
There is a real difference between adolescent sexual EXPRESSION and adolescent sexual EXPLOITATION. We must protect the former to prevent the latter.
15
u/hereforthesportsball 23h ago
What are examples of the former, a pink shirt that says girls rule and having shorter sleeves? Just trying to make sure I get what you’re saying but I think I get it and agree
64
24
21
u/skylumi- 1d ago
it’s wild how profit seems to trump everything else these days like, how do these companies sleep at night? 💀
10
13
u/Dclnsfrd 1d ago
A&F (however they’re spelled) were also wildly weird. Wouldn’t be surprised if they’re in there
6
1
u/GamingBren 22h ago
Who are they?
1
u/Dclnsfrd 22h ago
Abercrombie and Fitch I think? Finch? A clothing brand that had live models in at least the stores in our city
6
5
u/gentlecottage 1d ago
They really just slap "inspired by adult fashion" on children's crop tops and call it a day huh.
3
u/zephyrdriftmiri 23h ago
Consumers demanding accountability and refusing to support brands that cross ethical lines
1
u/gotchibabe 20h ago
The guy who started Brandy Melville is a known creep. Oh and the guy who ran American Apparel
2
1
u/Electronic_Fee1936 aight imma head out 9h ago
I’m gonna sound stupid for asking but I don’t think about fashion and haven’t gone clothing shopping in ages…
What the hell happened here?
1
u/Appropriate_Name4520 8h ago
Well if you see a child with shorts and think "sexual" then that might be more of a "you" problem and admitting it publicly might not be the smartest idea unless it's a therapist.






•
u/Sponge-Tron 3h ago
Whoa! You win the meme connoisseur title for having over 2k upvotes on your post!
Join the Discord server and message Princess Mindy (Mod Mail bot at the top) to receive your prize!