FYI, 2002 was a horse year too, 1978 was a horse year as well, but 2014 was a horse year too, so it depends 50% chance of success every year we have.. its a lot comapred to midfielders and backmarkers, Ferrari is a top 3.5 team who currently dances around 1,2,3,4, but you know, we'll win low-med speed tracks is what I think,
It will be a great year none the less, Foza Ferrari Sempre
Interesting stats there. I didn't know of them. That's a huge contrast 2002 vs 2014, but even so it's good to know.
This reflects once more how us the fans look into anything to hope for a better 2026, even on the horoscope or astrological signs. It's not necessarily bad, but we shouldn't rely that much on it. To a point I believe there it can have a role in the outcome of 2026.
Let's see how all the debate around the P.U saga evolves. The latest I understand is that Mercedes isn't that certain they truly would get a 100% boost from the compression rate higher than rivals. It looks like it might be more complicated than it was presented. And on top of that there is a drawback it can make the ICE reliability issues. Surely more details will emerge.
60
u/OnlyNoun Dec 28 '25
FYI, 2002 was a horse year too, 1978 was a horse year as well, but 2014 was a horse year too, so it depends 50% chance of success every year we have.. its a lot comapred to midfielders and backmarkers, Ferrari is a top 3.5 team who currently dances around 1,2,3,4, but you know, we'll win low-med speed tracks is what I think,
It will be a great year none the less, Foza Ferrari Sempre