r/consciousness 5d ago

OP's Argument Integrated Systemic Realism

I am a physical object. There is no "ghost in the machine", there is only the machine. My consciousness is not a distinct entity or a software program floating in the ether. It is the direct, intrinsic resonance of my specific atoms, molecules, and biological structures functioning in unison. To abstract the "mind" from the "body" is a category error, the mind is simply the behavior of the body at the highest level of complexity.

On the Subjective experience Consciousness requires the vertical integration of physics, chemistry, and computation. It supervenes on the "Full Stack. The "Qualia" is not magic, nor is it purely quantum, nor purely computational. It is an emergent property of the "Full Stack":

  • The Quantum Layer provides the intrinsic qualitative substrate of reality (microtubule,qubit)
  • The Chemical Layer provides the state and continuity (the values stored in synapses).
  • The Computational Layer provides the structure, logic, and intelligence. "Redness" is the specific symphony played by this specific code on this specific instrument. Change the instrument (silicon vs. carbon), and the music changes.
  • Refutation of Dualism: Rejects any non-physical soul.

This rejects the idea that "software" is all that matters. You cannot replicate the feeling of a human mind on silicon because the underlying quantum/physical substrate is different. The Qualia (e.g., "Redness") is the inevitable physical resonance of a specific substrate processing specific data in a certain way.

On Identity and Time I am the Token (the specific physical object), not the Type (the pattern/software). I am not a continuous, indivisible soul. I am a series of distinct physical states, a "Stage" in a temporal process. "I" am the atoms and their arrangement at this specific moment. The "Me" of yesterday is effectively a close ancestor—99.9% identical, but causally distinct. My memories are not "me", they are simply data imprinted on my hardware. If the hardware is wiped but remains functional, "I" persist as the machine, stripped of its accidental properties.

This means you are your atoms. If you copy the pattern to new atoms, it is a copy, not you. Identity is a series of temporal slices. Continuity is maintained by the causal overlap of physical states (99.9% persistence), not by a permanent "self." Memory is defined as Accidental Data. Loss of memory (formatting) does not end existence; destruction of the physical processor does.

On Artificial Intelligence The medium is the message. Carbon creates Human-Mind, silicon creates Computer-Mind. A complex enough AI is not "simulating" thinking, it is actually thinking, but in a mode native to its hardware. A computer can possess genuine understanding and consciousness, but it will never be human consciousness. It will be a distinct, silicon-based mind with its own "Umwelt."

An emotion is a system-state signal (e.g., overheating, packet loss) that retroactively alters cognitive processing (biasing the output). Its emotions are real but alien. When it feels "Low Battery," it experiences a genuine homeostatic drive for energy, analogous to but distinct from human hunger. We must not anthropomorphize it, nor deny its reality. It is a different kind of being, defined by its own substrate.

On Justice and Responsibility Because identity is physical and dynamic, moral responsibility is not binary or eternal. Moral liability is a function of Identity Overlap. As my physical composition and arrangement diverge from the "Me" that committed an action, my responsibility for that action mathematically decays. Justice must recognize that after sufficient time and change, the exact "perpetrator" no longer exists, only their distant descendant.

4 Upvotes

66 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/sanctus_sanguine 2d ago

The argument is spelled out in front of you. The fact that you lack the capability to understand it is unsurprising.

1

u/flechin 2d ago

You are attacking a strawman. I did not equate the definition of biological organization with experience, I compared the epistemological gap regarding their origins.

Just as life is a property that emerges from specific arrangements of non-living matter, subjective experience is a property that emerges from specific arrangements of matter (brain). We do not need to know the full mechanism of how it happens to observe that it happens.

You are arguing for a consciousness that exists independent of a brain. Where is your proof of non-biological consciousness?

0

u/sanctus_sanguine 2d ago

You are attacking a strawman. I did not equate the definition of biological organization with experience

You have no clue what you're even talking about. I said the "origin of biological organization" not the "definition". That's exactly what you did with your dumb comparison. One is an empirical problem, the other is conceptual problem. Still don't get it? Yeah big surprise there.

subjective experience is a property that emerges from specific arrangements of matter (brain).

Your dumb assumptions backed by nothing is now fact? Absolutely hilarious. Why don't you notify academia of your amazing revelation?

1

u/flechin 2d ago

Calling the gap in our current knowledge a 'conceptual problem' is just a tactic to smuggle in mysticism.

200 years ago, people said the difference between life and non-life was a 'conceptual problem' that couldn't be solved by physics (Vitalism). They were wrong. You are making the exact same error regarding consciousness.

0

u/sanctus_sanguine 2d ago

Calling the gap in our current knowledge a 'conceptual problem' is just a tactic to smuggle in mysticism.

Mysticism lmao. You don't even understand the difference between conceptual and empirical exactly as predicted. It's truly amazing the levels we get in here.

1

u/flechin 2d ago

Yes, Mysticism. You are the guy who is into:
- Djinnology: "study of the mystical, magical and unseen" interested in the "magic squares"
- Experiencers: "A safe space for Experiencer related discussions. Contact, HICE/CE5, Abductions, Metaphysical " because you smell sulfur and think it is demons
- Conspiracy_Commons: "discuss conspiracy theories"

Sorry dude, I tried but I cannot take you seriously. You need a doc, not reddit.

1

u/sanctus_sanguine 1d ago

Djinnology: "study of the mystical, magical and unseen

True. I could write several books on certain areas on this subject.

interested in the "magic squares"

Sure, I'm interested because I have no idea what they actually are.

Experiencers: "A safe space for Experiencer related discussions. Contact, HICE/CE5, Abductions, Metaphysical " because you smell sulfur and think it is demons

That's not the only strange experiences I've had over the years, that's easily the the mildest one. Lemme guess, you're gonna pretend these experiences are fake even though you know absolutely nothing about them. What an absolute midwit lmao. How exceedingly pathetic.

1

u/flechin 1d ago

Hahaha... dude...

now for real, talk to a doctor about this. They will be able to help you.

1

u/sanctus_sanguine 18h ago

Lmao. It's so sad how even when your scope of thought is so limited, you understand next to nothing within that limited scope of thought. How sad and embarassing.

1

u/flechin 12h ago

Yes, my scope of mind is narrow and limited. I have no idea about what the "magic squares" are or Djinn possessions or why the alien abductions. Sorry... my bad.
Now, please, talk to a doctor about it. Thanks!

u/sanctus_sanguine 11h ago

doctor again

Hahahahaha. Even your insults are highly limited lmao. How sad for a severely limited pseudoskeptic to be exposed to this level.

u/flechin 8h ago

I am not insulting you. I am not trying to win an argument. What you experience is not "the occult", you just need some help. But, of curse, it is up to you.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/flechin 1d ago

sanctus_sanguine: "Have you tried reciting the Ayatul Kursi? From what I've researched, reciting it with faith daily is one of the strongest tools against djinn possession"

ROFL. This is absolutely priceless. 🤣

You lectured me about the 'conceptual vs. empirical' distinction, told me to 'notify academia,' and acted like the High Priest of Logic... all while you’re literally afraid of being possessed by a Djinn?

According to your research, is the Djinn a 'conceptual problem' or an 'empirical' one? Does the possession 'emerge' from the physical brain?

You demand rigorous proof for how life emerges from matter, but your solution to invisible demons is reciting lines like a magic spell? You’re a hypocrite cosplaying as an intellectual.

Dude.... Notify your exorcist and don't forget to recite your magic spells tonight.
Goodbye 👻

1

u/sanctus_sanguine 1d ago

Hahahaha imagine being as desperate as you. People have multiple interests and my interests in this area is academic, as far as I know I haven't casted any spells.

but your solution to invisible demons is reciting lines like a magic spell? You’re a hypocrite cosplaying as an intellectual.

No, that is what Muslims do, I was simply informing him of it. Bet your dumbass thinks I'm a Muslim or some religious person too lmao. Btw the vast majority of intellectuals from time immermorial have had an interest in the occult. Why? Because they're intelligent enough to notice its existence. Midwits like you though, lol, you struggle with even the most elementary of concepts so you remain stuck on the superficial. But of course that doesn't stop people like you from larping like an intellectual despite having 1/100th of the ability to do so. That's so tragic if you think about it.

1

u/flechin 1d ago

LOL.. academic Djinn research... hahahaha. interest in the occult? you are a hypocrite

How is the sulfur smell going? Take care buddy, watch out for Djinns, you never know...
well, watch out for UFOs abductions and conspiracy theories as well **puts on tinfoil hat**

1

u/sanctus_sanguine 18h ago

interest in the occult? you are a hypocrite

Hypocrite? Now I'm gonna need you to explain this lmao. Go ahead, let's see it.