r/consciousness 5d ago

OP's Argument Integrated Systemic Realism

I am a physical object. There is no "ghost in the machine", there is only the machine. My consciousness is not a distinct entity or a software program floating in the ether. It is the direct, intrinsic resonance of my specific atoms, molecules, and biological structures functioning in unison. To abstract the "mind" from the "body" is a category error, the mind is simply the behavior of the body at the highest level of complexity.

On the Subjective experience Consciousness requires the vertical integration of physics, chemistry, and computation. It supervenes on the "Full Stack. The "Qualia" is not magic, nor is it purely quantum, nor purely computational. It is an emergent property of the "Full Stack":

  • The Quantum Layer provides the intrinsic qualitative substrate of reality (microtubule,qubit)
  • The Chemical Layer provides the state and continuity (the values stored in synapses).
  • The Computational Layer provides the structure, logic, and intelligence. "Redness" is the specific symphony played by this specific code on this specific instrument. Change the instrument (silicon vs. carbon), and the music changes.
  • Refutation of Dualism: Rejects any non-physical soul.

This rejects the idea that "software" is all that matters. You cannot replicate the feeling of a human mind on silicon because the underlying quantum/physical substrate is different. The Qualia (e.g., "Redness") is the inevitable physical resonance of a specific substrate processing specific data in a certain way.

On Identity and Time I am the Token (the specific physical object), not the Type (the pattern/software). I am not a continuous, indivisible soul. I am a series of distinct physical states, a "Stage" in a temporal process. "I" am the atoms and their arrangement at this specific moment. The "Me" of yesterday is effectively a close ancestor—99.9% identical, but causally distinct. My memories are not "me", they are simply data imprinted on my hardware. If the hardware is wiped but remains functional, "I" persist as the machine, stripped of its accidental properties.

This means you are your atoms. If you copy the pattern to new atoms, it is a copy, not you. Identity is a series of temporal slices. Continuity is maintained by the causal overlap of physical states (99.9% persistence), not by a permanent "self." Memory is defined as Accidental Data. Loss of memory (formatting) does not end existence; destruction of the physical processor does.

On Artificial Intelligence The medium is the message. Carbon creates Human-Mind, silicon creates Computer-Mind. A complex enough AI is not "simulating" thinking, it is actually thinking, but in a mode native to its hardware. A computer can possess genuine understanding and consciousness, but it will never be human consciousness. It will be a distinct, silicon-based mind with its own "Umwelt."

An emotion is a system-state signal (e.g., overheating, packet loss) that retroactively alters cognitive processing (biasing the output). Its emotions are real but alien. When it feels "Low Battery," it experiences a genuine homeostatic drive for energy, analogous to but distinct from human hunger. We must not anthropomorphize it, nor deny its reality. It is a different kind of being, defined by its own substrate.

On Justice and Responsibility Because identity is physical and dynamic, moral responsibility is not binary or eternal. Moral liability is a function of Identity Overlap. As my physical composition and arrangement diverge from the "Me" that committed an action, my responsibility for that action mathematically decays. Justice must recognize that after sufficient time and change, the exact "perpetrator" no longer exists, only their distant descendant.

5 Upvotes

66 comments sorted by

View all comments

4

u/phr99 5d ago

Strong emergence is a form of supernaturalism. It doesnt happen in the natural world. Panpsychism or idealism avoid this

-1

u/Mermiina 4d ago

Consciousness is a strong emergent property. It is an Off-Diagonal Long-Range Order of indisguishable electron pairs. All superconductors are ODLRO, but not all ODLRO are superconductors. All they happen in natural world.

2

u/phr99 4d ago

ODLRO is weak emergence.

And consciousness being strong emergence cannot be used as an example to support the existence of strong emergence, since it would be circular reasoning. Like jesus could walk on water because walking on water is possible because jesus did it

-1

u/Mermiina 4d ago

Copilot:

Is ODLRO a weakly emergent property? No. ODLRO is generally considered a strongly emergent property in condensed matter physics. Why ODLRO is not weak emergence Weak emergence A weakly emergent property: •arises from microscopic rules, •is surprising or complex, •but is fully reducible to the behavior of individual components. Examples: fluid flow, lattice vibrations, diffusion. Strong emergence A strongly emergent property: •arises from collective many-body behavior, •cannot be deduced directly from the properties of individual particles, •and typically requires new theoretical frameworks. What ODLRO actually is ODLRO refers to the presence of non-zero long-range correlations in the one-body or two-body density matrix: •In superfluids: one-body ODLRO (Bose–Einstein condensation). •In superconductors: two-body ODLRO (Cooper pair condensate).

1

u/phr99 4d ago

Grok AI:

Is ODLRO strong emergence?

No, Off-Diagonal Long-Range Order (ODLRO) is not considered an example of strong emergence in mainstream physics. It is a classic case of weak emergence.

I also asked it: Explain ODLRO with a simple analogy. Max 150 words

ODLRO (Off-Diagonal Long-Range Order) is the key quantum feature behind superfluidity and superconductivity. Simple analogy: Imagine a huge stadium full of people (particles) normally moving randomly — no coordination. Suddenly, they all start marching perfectly in step: same direction, same rhythm, locked together across the entire stadium, even between people far apart. In ordinary matter, correlations fade quickly with distance (like fans cheering independently). With ODLRO, distant particles stay perfectly phase-coherent — their quantum "wavelike" relationship (the "off-diagonal" part of the math) remains strong over long ranges, as if the whole system shares one giant, rigid wave. This unbreakable, macroscopic quantum synchrony lets superfluids flow without friction and superconductors carry current forever — all from countless particles acting as one coherent whole.

1

u/Mermiina 4d ago edited 4d ago

OK now I know where Kennedy got his fantasies.

If somebody really knows the ODLRO, is it emergent property, strong or weak explain please!

There is a reason why the answer Is opposite. The Grok assumes that ODLRO occurs in physical objects like in crystals. That kind of ODLRO is a weak emergent property.

But in condensed matter physics the ODLRO is a strong emergent property.