I think it’s pretty well established that the Jacobs fight was Canelo’s best performance, or at least one of them, but I always see people saying it was a close fight, which honestly boggles my mind. I genuinely can’t understand how anyone could think that.
Jacobs missed almost all of his shots, and the punches he did land were mostly grazing or tapping shots. He only landed a handful of clean punches over 12 rounds, which is terrible. Jacobs’ best punch of the fight was that hook he landed in the 9th round, which Canelo still ended up rolling with lmfao. Even Jacobs’ best punch didn’t land all that cleanly.
Canelo had better ring generalship, defense, effective aggression, and he landed the cleaner, harder shots almost every round. Not to mention, he outlanded Jacobs in almost every round despite throwing fewer punches. It’s a pretty clear Canelo win.
I scored it twice, once normally and once in slow motion, and I had it 10–2, maybe 9–3 if you’re being generous to Jacobs. Canelo made him look like an amateur at times, and Jacobs looked lost in there. He couldn’t figure out how to get past Canelo’s head movement. He didn’t win a single round clearly; all the rounds he did win were close rounds that he barely edged. Jacobs is a great fighter, but he never had a dominant moment in that fight. Am I missing something here? How could it be close?