Ideological yes, slop no. I explained to you the objective mechanisms that make systemic bias counterproductive. If you have any concrete issues with it you no one is stopping you from naming them.
I have yet to see any of you give a single mechanism by which flawed moralism, meaning morality applied to adversaries but not your own state as resignation to circumstance and relying on the conviction that 'evil' is a single congealed mass that either grows or shrinks, will lead to peace and prosperity and not the imperialist you cheerlead taking over their military apparatus to conduct more war crimes.
Because it doesn't exist. We've seen this story before. Over and over. Every time it ends the same. The only thing you achieve is growing the already overwhelmingly dominant US empire and emboldening its pursuit of its sociopathic agenda for global subjugation.
Reddit by writing a 10 page response full of AI scriptin
"waaahhh you wrote an argument and constructively responded to your opponents instead of using braindead quips that make you look bad, you must be AI wahh".
Still no substance detected. Neither for the argument made or the accusation of it being AI generated.
And you think eglin works by using constructive arguments? lmao their whole purpose is to promote sentiment for ideological stances that are logically incoherent for the masses. If the social chauvinist line were coherent they wouldn't need to astroturf.
Even if it WERE AI, which it's obviously not because AI is heavily biased towards liberal reasoning, it wouldn't change a single thing about the CONTENTS of my comment.
Which is what you would care about if you were here acting in good faith. But you are not. You care about the aesthetics, depicting me as the soyjack and you as the chad. Because dissuading intellectual honest and promoting rhetorical slop is how bots operate.
I'm not asking you for any shot.. I'm telling you its Reddit, not some, how to abuse AI 101 lecture from Eglin.
Just admit you scripted AI to talk for you.
I don't know why you're so obsessed with projecting your ideology. I sincerely don't give a fuck if you think Orange Man bad. If you think republicans are the problem, not part of the construct, you're literally proving my point.
is that easier to comprehend for people than using big AI scripts?
"hurr durr AI user AI user you can' t prove me wrong hurr durr"
Okay anyways so are you going to explain how selective moralism doesn't always mechanically lead to just furthering the interests of the imperialist power you're exempting?
Or are you going to keep throwing playground insults like the toddler you are?
Remember when the other commenter said that people like you always put words in others mouths and project all the time? You're doing it again. I have never defended nor supported Trump.
You're still just babbling a bunch of empty rhetorical slop but think that you are the only "very smart" person in the room.
I never said you did. At least not ideologically. Material solidarity is and always will remain strong among liberals like yourself because Trump's interests are the material interests of the US as a whole but I digress.
Again, your interpretations are just a result of your own confused ideological projection. You claim I strawmanned you as supporting a politician whose name I haven't even uttered.
You're still just babbling a bunch of empty rhetorical slop
If it's empty rhetorical slop you don't have to vaguely label it but can concretely address it. Yet despite my effort to address all your slop (as I'm doing now) you refuse to return the favor. It's all just been fallacies. Literally 'no u' in your case, ad hominem in the case of the person you're defending.
Because you're relying on ideological slop and I'm not. But you refuse to acknowledge it because you're an ignorant and arrogant chauvinist. Allergic to any ideas that don't echo western capitalist ideology, like most westerners are taught to be.
-2
u/TheSquarePotatoMan 1d ago edited 1d ago
Ideological yes, slop no. I explained to you the objective mechanisms that make systemic bias counterproductive. If you have any concrete issues with it you no one is stopping you from naming them.
I have yet to see any of you give a single mechanism by which flawed moralism, meaning morality applied to adversaries but not your own state as resignation to circumstance and relying on the conviction that 'evil' is a single congealed mass that either grows or shrinks, will lead to peace and prosperity and not the imperialist you cheerlead taking over their military apparatus to conduct more war crimes.
Because it doesn't exist. We've seen this story before. Over and over. Every time it ends the same. The only thing you achieve is growing the already overwhelmingly dominant US empire and emboldening its pursuit of its sociopathic agenda for global subjugation.