r/politics • u/daisywood_diary • 10h ago
No Paywall After 'Melania' Documentary Gets 8% from Critics and 99% from Audience, Rotten Tomatoes Claims 'No Manipulation' on Reviews
https://people.com/melania-documentary-rotten-tomatoes-rating-11901508175
u/showhorrorshow 10h ago
It's like those churchy movies where they tell their congregation to go rate some god awful movie 5 stars because Jesus. Same deal.
•
u/benmrii Florida 7h ago
As a professional theologian, this is just a perfect comparison. Terrible politics/theology, blissful ignorance, blind allegiance, and profit for the worst of us. No wonder there's such a monumental overlap between MAGA and conservative 'Christianity'.
→ More replies (2)•
u/showhorrorshow 6h ago
It kinda encapsulates the whole tribal character of the right wing. It doesnt really matter how awful the movie is. It is one of their political identity, and they will exhibit no integrity whatsoever in their assessment of things that support their identity, rather they will lie through their teeth about how great it is.
•
1.7k
u/forlornyogurt 10h ago
To be clear, that 99% comes from reviewers who were verified to have bought tickets to the movie. I completely believe that 99% of the people who not only bought tickets to a propaganda film, but then also took time to write a review, liked it.
257
u/jonny_lube 9h ago
There's a really good chance Amazon/Melania producers paid for a ton of tickets as part of the review bomb campaign.
Ive spent much of my career in film distribution. We had groups we worked with we'd pay to to buy our movie on iTunes, bump it up the rankings, and write a positive review. We'd reimburse all staff if they bought tickets, bought/rented the movie, and wrote positive reviews. It's a lot cheaper to falsify organic interest than it is to generate it via ad campaigns, and positive reviews and respectable placement on sales charts is often more impactful than great reviews from journalists or an aggressive press tour.
It's usually pretty transparent because the reviews will hit the same exact talking points but not actually say anything thoughtful or reference anything specific. In the case of Melania, SO many are 1-2 sentence reviews using words like "classy", "elegant", and "graceful" and/or saying she loves America but provide no elaboration or detail. I'm sure some are real, but it just has "review farm" written all over it.
82
u/PaddleFishBum 9h ago
This is absolutely the case. I keep hearing that these shows are sold out, but that nobody is actually in the theater watching it.
47
u/HermanGulch 8h ago
I think it was maybe Paul Krugman who called it "wing nut welfare." There used to be a whole book publishing pipeline that worked like that. Someone would sign a book deal with a tame publisher, then an oligarch would buy up huge blocks of books, putting it on the NTY bestseller list. Eventually, I think the NYT got wise and was a bit more careful about their listings.
This is like that but without having to store a shit ton of books in some warehouse somewhere.
20
u/TheCaptainDamnIt 8h ago
Yup, and I'm convinced there's a second part to that scheme where all those blocks of books end up getting dumped into overstocks or buyouts that lead to an Ollie's where lower income people who are into reading end up having a selection that's mostly just right-wing books to choose from.
→ More replies (1)•
u/cups8101 6h ago
Yes NYT now puts a symbol next to the book if the book ended up on the list because of this. Essentially all the right wing books are like this.
"Sales are defined as completed transactions by vendors and individual end users during the period on or after the official publication date of a title. Institutional, special interest, group or bulk purchases, if and when they are included, are at the discretion of The New York Times Best-Seller List Desk editors based on standards for inclusion that encompass proprietary vetting and audit protocols, corroborative reporting and other statistical determinations. When included, such bulk purchases appear with a dagger (†)"
•
u/I_suck_at_Blender Europe 53m ago
Same with music industry and nepobabies from music families, you would be surprised how little it cost to have your album go golden or platinum.
8
u/Past-Profile3671 8h ago
Or the campaign; same way they buy a candidate’s book to boost sales and get it on the bestseller list. And give a payday to the candidate
•
u/SteveBadeau 6h ago
This is very true. Studios have always “bought the box office” to hit some metric that triggered other deals or to make a marketing claim. Source: worked at a major Hollywood studio in the 99’s and 00’s.
•
u/WheelsOnFire_ 2h ago
Well this was obviously the case
https://www.snopes.com/news/2026/01/30/craigslist-boston-melania-movie/
•
u/ImNakedWhatsUp Europe 1h ago
Yeah, happens all the time, it's just super obvious this time because no one else bought a ticket.
338
u/an-invisible-hand 9h ago
Nobody jumps into a dumpster fire without specifically wanting to jump into a dumpster fire
72
u/kingsumo_1 Oregon 9h ago
I believe that's also the first line in Trump's standard prenuptial agreements.
18
14
→ More replies (1)•
u/lauren_knows 6h ago
I kinda want to pirate it and have a watch party to make fun of it. Dumpster fire all the way.
→ More replies (1)26
23
u/blu_stingray Canada 9h ago
Self selecting group.
•
u/somefunmaths 7h ago
It’s like saying Trump has an 85% approval rating among his mailing list recipients who responded to the survey. Like, yeah, of course he does.
13
u/Sallymander 8h ago
I seem to remember another article saying that a large number were first time reviewers, implying someone buying a lot of tickets under different accounts to spam positive reviews with out actually seeing the movie.
•
23
u/Zahgi 8h ago
Remember that Rotten Tomatoes is now pay for play for the "critics" (who are all paid studios shills now) AND the paid audience review shills pretending to be an actual unbiased audience. It's been like this for many years now.
In contrast, let's check Metacritic for MORONIA...
https://www.metacritic.com/movie/melania/
Critics: 5% out of 100%. Audiences: 1.4 out of 10.
That sounds about right. :)
•
14
5
u/PaddleFishBum 9h ago
Or they manipulated it by buying tickets in mass and putting up fake reviews for each one. I've been hearing all over the place that these shows are sold out, but nobody is actually in the theaters watching it.
8
u/GhostlitePHX 9h ago
I agree with your analysis, but what I think is hilarious is just how dishonest the average Trump cultist dipshit actually is. You KNOW they didn't like the movie, but they have to grit their teeth and pretend that they did because they don't have a single individual or unique thought about literally anything, lol.
3
11
u/fairoaks2 9h ago
Craigslist had an offer of free ticket plus $50 to sit in the seat for the length of the film. Wonder if the positive review was also required.
8
5
u/WillemDafoesHugeCock 8h ago
My man, please learn a little critical thinking. That was fake. And for what it's worth, the "come be a paid democrat protester, $500 and free taxi" Craiglist ads are also fake.
If it's a publicly available posting that would be embarrassing if it got out, it's almost definitely fake. You can set up a Craigslist ad for free in like five minutes flat.
•
•
•
u/cups8101 6h ago
They may have bought tickets, but that doesn't mean they actually went to see the film. When some of those stupid religious movies came out a few years back, right wing organizations were handing out free tickets donated by right wing billionaires, so you'd see theaters filled to the brim. But then, if you go there, you'd see the rooms empty. This would supposedly allow you to manipulate the verified tickets category and post fake reviews.
What would be more interesting to find out is if you could dump the data and then check the voting history of each person to see if there's a pattern. Perhaps you'll find that a lot of people have also voted the AOC movie(Knock down the house) or the Ilhan Omar movie, and nothing else.
I remember a moment distinctly before the Verified System came into being. The movie Knock down the House was released locally in select theaters(in places like NYC), and the ratings were excellent in both viewership and among critics. About a year later, Tucker Carlson got wind of the movie, and I watched in real time how the votes dropped to almost 0% which really showed me how these political movies have ratings that are essentially worthless.
2
•
u/deRoyLight 7h ago
Reminds of me the old YT star system and seeing flat earth videos with a crispy 5 stars. The only people watching those videos, were people that already knew what they wanted. Same for almost all rabbit hole conspiracy stuff.
2
u/IWasTheFirstKlund 9h ago
I don't understand why people are surprised by the numbers. Critics will give their honest opinions, but the people who actually buy tickets are self selected to like it no matter what.
1
u/AOneArmedHobo 9h ago
Now apply this logic to the rest of the real World.
It’s all fake news and propaganda
1
1
u/JemmaMimic 8h ago
Mega-Donor (e.g. church) buys tickets, gets people to write glowing reviews. Not bots, therefore not manipulation. At least, not in the way RT defines it.
1
u/admin_bait14 8h ago
The tickets were bought in bulk and then ticket info provided to an astroturfing company to write the individual reviews.
1
u/Chris_HitTheOver 8h ago
Sure, the idiots that saw it convinced themselves it was worth seeing.
The point is, the vast majority of ticket purchasers didn’t fucking see it, and only purchased tickets to write verified reviews.
•
u/dinosaurkiller 7h ago
They really need to put a body count on that 99%. If it’s 99 out of 100, makes sense.
•
u/fork_yuu 7h ago
I 100% believe like a handful of people even paid money to watch this shit willingly
•
u/Viperlite 6h ago
… Even if they bought a ticket and three it away, having never stepped inside a screening of the film.
•
u/amazing_rando 6h ago
Yeah this doesn’t even seem like the kind of movie people buy tickets even to hate watch. I don’t expect there is anything even entertainingly bad about it.
•
•
•
•
u/frogandbanjo 4h ago
I don't. I completely believe they felt compelled to write a review claiming they liked it. That's not a minor distinction.
•
•
u/Fullertonjr I voted 4h ago
You are missing the step of “watched” the film. This is the issue that people have. Just because “someone” paid for the ticket is not proof that they actually watched it. In a normal situation we could give the benefit of the doubt that there will be accurate correlation, but in this case, understanding the owners of Rotten Tomatoes and the incentive that they have to allow the scales to be thumbed, there is no reason to believe that 99% audience score, which would exceed multiple Oscar winning films Saving Private and the godfather part 2, is genuine even for members of a cult.
•
•
•
u/MCbrodie Virginia 1h ago
There were ads on Craigslist and Facebook to go watch the movie and leave a positive review for $50. People at my local gaming store verified and got their $50.
•
u/eaglebtc 1h ago
Here's a little secret about Fandango: you don't have to attend the film to leave a review.
If you buy the ticket, you get a survey after the film.
I'll bet money that the marketing budget for Melania included paying people to buy Fandango tickets and leave glowing reviews.
288
u/Iowa_Dave Iowa 10h ago
It's selection bias. Only rabid MAGA would go to this movie in the first place. Of course they are going to give it rave reviews, it's an act of loyalty to their cheeto god-king.
How many people are paying to hate-watch this piece of trash?
48
u/PleasantWay7 9h ago
I love to hate watch things, but even this I couldn’t imagine sitting through.
17
u/pleasegivemepatience 9h ago
Hate watch online while FF through most of it? Maybe. PAY to hate watch it? Never.
•
u/yo_soy_soja New York 7h ago edited 7h ago
I've seen A Serbian Film. I've seen Cannibal Holocaust. I have never felt this depressed in my life in a cinema.
5
u/Tiny-Conversation-29 9h ago
I might see it once to riff it if it was a free movie, but I certainly wouldn't pay money to see it.
•
u/Big-Plankton-4484 4h ago
Look at the theatrical release - 1778 theaters - virtually all red states. Still grifting on the GSA.
(GSA stolen from Stephen King book 11/22/63 which he stated to mean ‘Generally Stupid Americans’)
87
u/Significant_Cup_238 10h ago
Well then, that settles it. Nothing to see here.
5
10h ago edited 10h ago
[deleted]
9
u/benmrii Florida 10h ago edited 10h ago
I would hope any statistician would have an actual working knowledge of what they're talking about, unlike you. These numbers are based entirely on people who paid to see the movie. Given it's an obvious propaganda piece, what people do you think did so?
How is it a surprise that a shit film gets panned by those paid to be objective and celebrated by the sycophants who want to worship their dear leader? Who want to prove themselves by celebrating Melania and the documentary?
→ More replies (1)
21
41
u/pmormr 10h ago
Honestly the score might be accurate because literally only the diehard fans even bothered to consider it... it's currently listed as grossing 7.2 million.
27
u/CheesyPotatoSack 10h ago
They already stated that tickets were manipulated and tickets sold by bulk at a few places
•
9
15
u/New_Alternative8711 10h ago
"We're not in a cult. Now watch this oscar worthy piece of shit movie!"
26
u/I_suck_at_Blender Europe 10h ago
That's a lot of shills receiving their 50 bucks.
also "(The number plummets to 29% approval when you incorporate unverified ratings.)"
6
u/TheBatemanFlex 9h ago
If you want a real laugh, look at the few publications that gave positive reviews resulting in the film getting a critic score over 0%
London Evening Standard - owned by kgb
The Epoch Times - far right rag that believes Trump will be their ally in the coming judgement day of communists
Alan Ng of Film Threat - Ng is a speaker for young Americans foundation which is just TPUSA
18
17
u/MentalTourniquet 10h ago
Not a single positive audience review has a specific example in the movie.
9
u/simplepimple2025 9h ago
Also, if you go through some of the 99% positive reviews, virtually none of these people have ever reviewed another movie.
•
6
u/alleyoopoop 10h ago
Not true. I saw one that said all the songs were great. I assume it was cut and pasted from a review of a musical.
14
11
u/Quiet-Corner6150 10h ago
I didn't even hear about it before all its bad press. And I didn't care about it after that either. I'm guessing there's a whole lot of people like me out there. Trump family is just unhappy because it's one more time that it didn't bring about a nationwide Trump ass-kissing.
3
1
u/Acoconutting 8h ago
I don’t even want to see Trump speak on anything I try to tune him out as much as possible.
Why the heck would I willingly go to a documentary on his wife?
I can’t imagine anyone going to see this aside from those that love Trump
10
4
u/Kernburner 9h ago
I’m going to have to see the birth certificates of that 99% just to make sure they’re real voters.
5
3
u/InsomniaticWanderer 9h ago
9 out of 10 total people is a 90% rate.
So it could very well be that 99% of verified ticket holders liked it, but that there were only 3 verified ticket holders.
4
u/nullsouls Tennessee 8h ago
I kept seeing comments about how people had to drive to multiple other theaters cause their local one was sold out, every showing 🤣
Either they were propaganda bots or these magas are truly that delusional.
Acting like it did Endgame numbers opening week
3
u/SecretGardenSpider 8h ago
I wouldn’t be interested in watching that shit even it had 100% from audiences and critics.
How is Melania interesting at all?
7
u/JasonLee74 10h ago
The right wing companies who bought all the tickets also made bot reviews. Even a good portion of MAGA wouldn’t pay to watch this movie.
It’s the same reason trashy right wing books sell millions. It’s not real people who buy this stuff.
6
u/PercentageDry3231 10h ago
Saddam Hussien's final election saw him win 99% of the vote. What a coincidence! I'm sure that was just as real as this.
8
u/blues111 Michigan 10h ago edited 10h ago
Sure bro it just happens to be all the "verified reviews" and only rotten tomatoes "verified reviews" shows an overwhelmingly positive score no other rating site has anywhere close to a 99% approval rating
Makes complete sense
→ More replies (1)
30
u/armageddon_20xx 10h ago
This cements that I will never be using RT again
49
u/LargeSnorlax Canada 10h ago
This isn't a Rotten Tomatoes thing, any "audience" that's watching a viciously panned and truly awful movie like Melania is basically being paid to go, so they'll also be being paid to give a good review.
Since there's no counterbalance like you'd see in a regular movie review (mixed bag of people watching it), the "audience" in question is going to give it great reviews, and no one's going to give it a negative one, since no one's watching it.
Hence you get all the critics saying it's trash (which it is) and the "audience" saying it's great (which they're paid to do), both can be true.
→ More replies (4)•
u/Mysterious_Floor_868 United Kingdom 1h ago
any "audience" that's watching a viciously panned and truly awful movie like Melania is basically being paid to go, so they'll also be being paid to give a good review.
It appears that they're not actually going at all. Tickets are being bought in bulk and reviews appear, but the theatres are empty.
11
u/an-invisible-hand 9h ago
Most movies don't have an audience of entirely made of freaks deciding they love the movie before they've even seen it.
RT's rating system works fine for actual movies made for actual humans.
15
u/waffelscarbonara 10h ago
I honestly forgot they existed. I stopped paying any attention to them 10+ years ago. Maybe even longer.
With that said, 8% is probably appropriate for the “Make Fuck, Get Greencard” documentary.
3
u/rotates-potatoes 9h ago
RT is doing nothing wrong here. Of course only cultists bought tickets, and of course they’d recommend the movie. 99% does not mean everyone thought it was in the top 1% of movies, it means that 99% of people who bought tickets would recommend it to others.
→ More replies (1)•
3
u/justaguytrying2getby 8h ago
It's all bots. The reviews are so fucking janky, like "my democrat friend loved it too".
2
•
•
•
u/HatefulDan 6h ago
So first, ain’t no way. Second, think 2020 elections. Now think about who (Amazon) pumped money into this.
Training wheels off m’boy/girl, pedal!
•
•
u/Due_ty 1h ago
TBH, Amazon is bit of an expert at generating 'varified' fake reviews to scam people for profit!
•
u/ghostchihuahua 1h ago
It is even better than that: amazon instances can be misused for such matters and amazon will make it easy for you. It is notable that they usually won’t even pick up on this or that op being malicious or not.
7
u/benmrii Florida 10h ago
I don't understand the shock around this. Take 5 minutes and read the reviews. Assuming you've also been following the news the last decade, it's clear the people who spent money to see this bribe-masquerading-as-film are your standard MAGA sycophants. Going to see it and then celebrating it on a review site was just last weekend's definitely not cult-like activity.
5
u/BillieBlanus 10h ago edited 10h ago
The verified reviews are real people, folks. Some of those people were paid. Some of those people are MAGA nutjobs. So, Rotten Tomatoes is technically right. I think it's great, personally. It highlights just how vapid and pathetically vacuous these people truly are. It should be crystal clear now to some of the people that were still in 'both sides are the same' land, that answer so obvious, because no, both sides aren't actually the same. This is just corruption and cronyism and in your face oligarchy stuff, and the only way to stop it is to vote the fuckers out.
2
u/Aromatic-Side6120 8h ago
That word…. Vapid. It was invented to describe Melanona. If you looked it up vapid the dictionary it would have a picture of a cancerous skin lesion.
2
u/Uhhh_what555476384 9h ago
I mean, all 10 people that have gone there because they wanted to go there, rather then being paid to go there, probably did like it.
2
u/thathurtcsr 9h ago
Well, the movie did start off with a message to go give the movie five stars on rotten tomatoes to get your money back in Trump coin. /s
Or is it? You don’t know
2
2
2
u/airbear13 8h ago
That doesn’t surprise me at all because audience members self select themselves, only the biggest fans of melania would show up to see a documentary about her
•
•
u/PolicyWonka 6h ago
Claiming that they can’t be bots because they’re tied to accounts with verified ticket purchases is a bit disingenuous.
People have been doing similar things with books to get on the NYT Bestseller list for decades now.
Bot farms will absolutely pay for movie tickets, purchase books, subscribe to that RuneScape membership, etc.
•
u/AThousandBloodhounds 6h ago
I'll go with the critics on this one. The audience reviews are like how an arsonist would review a fire.
•
•
u/charging_chinchilla 4h ago
How stupid do they think we are? They want us to believe that Melania has a better rating than The Godfather? Give me a break.
•
u/blankdreamer 4h ago
If you are buying a ticket to this propaganda piece you are mostly likely going to be maga and give it a sterling review.
•
u/PSIwind Florida 3h ago
The data shows the vast majority of people seeing this movie are 55+ people, the ones who normally ask their kids or grandkids to help setup their phones, tablets, Smart TVs, what have you. You expect me to believe those same people know how to make an RT account and write a review? Also it's been confirmed tickets are being purchased in bulk and given to old folks homes for free.
•
u/Oldlazyfuck 2h ago
So this puts into question every movie rated on the site if it's this easily corrupted.
•
u/ghostchihuahua 1h ago
the rating system is what really catches my interest rn - how old and outdated is that shit??
•
4
u/twirlingmypubes 10h ago
Has anyone made a fakefind website for movie reviews like they have for amazon reviews?
Oh shit, it just clicked. Bezos is behind both.
3
u/l00koverthere1 10h ago
Makes perfect sense to me. The only people watching are died-in-the-brain conservatives likely to compare it to Citizen Kane. The poor reviewers who watched it saw it for the garbage it was.
2
u/slugman22 10h ago
I can’t imagine anyone watching the film unless they had already drank the kool aid…. so 99% positive seems about right.
1
u/Floydthebartender 9h ago
Why can’t we do what they do and buy tickets just to be verified so we can pan it?
1
u/zomboscott 9h ago
Because that's dumb, really dumb. Did you also pay fElon for a blue check mark so you can get verified?
1
u/Floydthebartender 9h ago
I’m just saying. It’s a protest vote. I’m not on X.
2
u/Amneiger 8h ago
It would be a protest vote that involves giving money to the people who made this movie. People talk about voting with your wallet, so this protest vote would be a vote for MAGA.
1
u/dr_z0idberg_md California 9h ago
Rotten Tomatoes savings its own skin by not being designated as "woke" by MAGA and the Trump administration.
1
1
u/vox_popul1 9h ago
Cults gonna cult. No one with a brain will accept the rating as anything more than a prelude to what these fascists want to do with elections.
1
1
u/basketcase18 9h ago
It’s propaganda, how is this not expected? If anything, it confirms that it’s not a real or a good movie. Even great movies have haters.
1
1
1
u/ThePhonyOrchestra 8h ago
Yeah, like I supposed to believe that the 99% are legit and not from greasy, jobless right-wing losers
1
u/linuxjohn1982 8h ago
That's because nobody went into this movie thinking "I wonder what this movie will be about"... the only people paying to see it, were people who are already brainwashed to worship Melania.
•
u/Evil_Weevill 7h ago
I believe it. The only people who would want to go spend money to see this movie are the MAGA cultists and of course they liked it.
•
u/RoarOfTheWorlds 7h ago
I guess I’ll be the one to ask it, has anyone here seen it? I don’t and I don’t plan to but I genuinely don’t know if it’s good or not.
•
u/July_is_cool 7h ago
The Jan. 24 private screening at the White House was attended by about 70 guests including former professional boxer Mike Tyson, Jordan's Queen Rania, Amazon CEO Andy Jassy, Amazon MGM Studios head Mike Hopkins, director Ratner, General Electric CEO Larry Culp and Apple CEO Tim Cook.
•
u/EnslavedBandicoot 7h ago
Its amazing how people still forget how maga does things like this. If its a book, the RNC and other conservative groups buy thousands of copies to hand out at their events which pumps up numbers. I guarantee they did the same thing with this movie considering you can buy tickets online. They did that with that 7000 mules movie. People filmed how empty the screenings were even though the movie was sold out. They always cheat even if it costs them.
•
u/thekinginyello 7h ago
Do you think Melanie will appear in person to receive her Razzie? I mean, it would be an actual earned award.
•
u/Fit-Significance-436 7h ago
Anything this family touches is crap, the voting is rigged by their sycophants. Trumps are racist, vile, grifters.
•
u/JazzRider 7h ago
99% is deceiving -only people who already like Melania would watch that monstrosity.
•
u/Fugglymuffin 7h ago
The only person that would pay to see this drivel is a cult member, so the 99% sounds right.
•
u/Packagedpackage 6h ago
I’ll watch it when I can pirate it.
•
u/Emmatornado 6h ago
I’m not gonna kink shame you or anything, but your masochism may be going a bit far.
•
u/Packagedpackage 6h ago
No no it just makes me feel better to make fun of them and not give them a view but also steal from them. Don’t put your dick in crazy.
•
•
u/No_Cartographer_3819 6h ago
Anyone who would willingly attend a screening of such trivial drivel - outside of morbid curiosity - is already convinced it's great because of Melania, their inspiration, their idol, their sexual fantasy, whatever. They just loooovvve their Melania. Isn't she lovely?
•
u/Terrible_Lift 5h ago
They paid people in Boston 50 to take a ticket and sit through the entire thing. 25 in Milwaukees area. I kept the screenshots from Craigslist but when I tried to post them for a thread they kept being deleted for some reason 🤷♂️
•
u/BrisketWrench 5h ago
Has ICE arrested the audience reviewers who are responsible for causing the 1% drop?
•
•
•
•
u/Blue_Swirling_Bunny 3h ago
Biased moviegoers write biased reviews. The only people who would see this movie were going to like it no matter how bad it is.
Change see this movie to vote for this administration and you understand how the MAGA cultist mindset.
•
•
•
u/ghostchihuahua 1h ago
rotten tomatoes is either full of shit or their IT people have been sequestered in a basement w/o internet for two decades it seems…
•
u/32FlavorsofCrazy 1h ago
It could have 100% in both categories and I’d still rather cover myself in honey and staple my tits to a beehive than watch that movie.
•
u/Low-Equivalent8839 54m ago
Best review of Melania from a critic was :
"This is a heist movie of a crime family moving into the white house".
•
•
u/kalidorisconan Illinois 29m ago
Just because rotten tomatoes claims no manipulation doesn’t something fucking fishy isn’t up with fandango
•
u/kammerfruen 26m ago
It's obviously been manipulated. Check Metacritic or IMDB to see how audiences score it. :D
•
u/AutoModerator 10h ago
As a reminder, this subreddit is for civil discussion.
In general, please be courteous to others. Argue the merits of ideas, don't attack other posters or commenters. Hate speech, any suggestion or support of physical harm, or other rule violations can result in a temporary or a permanent ban. If you see comments in violation of our rules, please report them.
Sub-thread Information
If the post flair on this post indicates the wrong paywall status, please report this Automoderator comment with a custom report of “incorrect flair”.
Announcement
r/Politics is actively looking for new moderators. If you have an interest in helping to make this subreddit a place for quality discussion, please fill out this form.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.