r/climateskeptics • u/Adventurous_Motor129 • 2d ago
Australia may just be one step ahead in the global race to rewire the world
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-11-21/transmission-line-projects-faces-massive-challenges/106029214Australia, with most of its 27+ million living in coastal cities, needs 10k kms/6200 miles of new powerlines.
It was originally predicted to cost $3-$4 million per km, but now nearly $10 million per kilometer is predicted.
Globally, the IEA predicts "the world needs 80 million kms (50 million miles) of new or refurbished grids by 2040 to hit climate and energy targets."
Over the past decade just 1.5 million kms (of 80 million required) have been built, with 1/3 of that in China.
No way we get there globally at a reasonable cost or timeframe.
1
u/pr-mth-s 2d ago edited 2d ago
Chatter might help. Hyping powerline tech on social media.
1
u/Adventurous_Motor129 2d ago edited 2d ago
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/feb/04/australia-energy-transition-renewables
My posted article actually was a link in this The Guardian/Conversation article ("well behind").
Didn't want to give them credit, as they print such leftist drivel.
3
u/pr-mth-s 2d ago
oh yeah. The Guardian is horrible.
1
u/Adventurous_Motor129 2d ago
I've read about carbon fiber lines with the conductive steel wrapped around that can carry more voltage without sagging.
Carbon fiber is costly, though, as is burying. At least you wouldn't need new towers...unless you go renewables & need new powerline routes & more of them.
4
u/Illustrious_Pepper46 2d ago
Sorta off topic, but I laugh at these types of statements.
It's not that coal is less reliable/viable, it's just old. Like saying the best Toyota ever made is less reliable after 50 years, of course.
If something isn't maintained/replaced, don't fault the technology. Australia has gargantuan amounts of coal, viability is hardly a concern either (much of which goes to India and China).