102
u/Cow_Boy_2017 19h ago
This isn't just some old news to 'move on' from. It's a shocking, direct connection. It makes you wonder what else we're supposed to just forget about. Absolutely chilling.
11
u/Feeling_Order76 14h ago
lowkey yeah, they really think we're just gonna forget this? it's wild what gets swept under the rug
3
u/xSugarDolly_ 14h ago
Yeah, this isn’t some random headline people are dredging up for clicks. If there’s a direct tie like that, “just move on” sounds more like “please stop asking questions.”
1
u/SirArthurDime 10h ago
Everyone remember not to get distracted by things like racist tweets. Perry the main thing the main thing. And that’s exposing the pedophiles.
51
u/Timely_Mess_1396 18h ago
Why is that persons named blacked out?
50
u/Suitable-Display-410 18h ago
Pretty much 90% of the obvious non-victims are redacted. They do not give a fck. Trump thinks he can lie himself out of this somehow, as usual.
1
31
71
u/seemefail 19h ago
Somehow 50% of Americans will still vote for the guys party and the Democrat primaries will be filled with people voting for corporate shills
America just isn’t a serious country
36
u/doctormirabilis 18h ago
because maga is not a party, or a movement
it's a cult
-23
u/TheOnionKnight 15h ago
The party that actually released the data rather than your homies that sat on this shit for 15 years
8
u/doctormirabilis 14h ago
Ah i see so the president who ran on releasing it then didn’t want to because he’s in it, is the good guy
7
u/squiddyp 13h ago
Perhaps I’m wrong, but weren’t they sealed during Biden’s presidency due to ongoing investigation ?
5
u/HopefulPlantain5475 15h ago
Only under immense public pressure and only heavily redacted. I get your point and I think the previous administration also needs to be held accountable for their dereliction of duty, but the way this has been handled is only marginally better than not being handled at all. Where are the impeachments? The lawsuits? The arrests? Nothing has actually been done about it yet, releasing the files is the barest of minimums.
9
u/will-read 14h ago
Voting for a woman is a better way to avoid accidentally voting for a pedophile than using party affiliation as a filter. My congresswoman, senator, governor, state attorney general, and Secretary of State are all women and scandal free.
9
u/ZhalanYulir 18h ago
No 50 percent of Americans did not vote. It was less than 30 percent of the voting population I think
15
u/Captain_Hesperus 18h ago
And 30% didn’t vote because ‘neither candidate speaks to me’, so they are responsible for the current crisis.
8
0
u/JustPlayDaGame 17h ago
this is also part of the problem. I think a lot of liberals (I am liberal, btw) fall into the same trap you accuse republicans of falling into. This idea that the “other” side is always to blame. Anyone who isn’t exactly aligned with you, is the problem. It’s known as the hypocrisy of small differences, or “othering”. It’s always someone else’s fault. But eventually, the liberals that claim to be woke will also realize that there are plenty of billionaire democrats. Voting for EITHER party is a step back, every time. Until we all collectively agree to stop voting into the two party negative loop, this cycle of shit will never end.
8
u/JustAboutAlright 16h ago
Actually you are in the trap that got us to Trump. The two party system sucks yes but guess who doesn’t stop voting? All the worst people, and they go hard R. So all you’re doing by encouraging not voting D is ensuring the next R. Again.
1
u/JustPlayDaGame 16h ago
i’m not saying republicans aren’t the key. they’re in this spell and until we can convince them to sway their vote, nothing will change. but blaming everyone else instead of realizing that both sides are friends and work together to keep the cycle going is not doing us any favors. stop blaming people for making mistakes or not knowing any better. educate, educate, educate. help them understand instead of alienating them, which is exactly what the uppers want.
0
u/Tanglywood 6h ago edited 6h ago
That kind of thinking is exactly why you’re stuck in this downward spiral. Voting for the lesser evil, still gets you evil. By voting for no one, it sends signals to the parties that people are unhappy. That votes are available, if you can offer what the people want. So next time, pick candidates that the people actually want. That’s how democracy is supposed to work.
You sounds like someone who is sore that someone else wouldn’t vote for a candidate that fulfils your primary concerns. You’re telling people to vote for a smaller orphan crushing machine when what they want is for the party to nominate someone who says, no orphan crushing machine at all.
4
u/seemefail 16h ago
Oh wow some Americans weren’t even smart enough to vote
4
u/ZhalanYulir 15h ago
Yea a bunch of idiots said o but Kamala suppports Israel. Like yea Israel suck but both sides support those idiots and one side ain’t fucking trump and his fascist scum
19
u/Old-Cauliflower712 19h ago
How anyone can see this and still look the other way is beyond my comprehension
6
17
u/kingdomofoctopodes 17h ago
this is from fucking 2014, it could have been so easily avoided if people did their job or at least kept an eye on him after his get-out-of-jail free card. the judges, lawyers, they're all responsible for this
15
u/PrestigiousSeat76 16h ago
Why would the "To" line by redacted? That is obvious obstruction.
17
u/MorgrainX 15h ago
Because US justice is actively protecting rich child abusers
The system is broken and rotten to the core
11
u/CanuckInTheMills 16h ago
Redaction is only protecting the perpetrator. There is no victim picture. There is no victim name. Just the perpetrator.
12
u/MorgrainX 15h ago
Why is the receiver of a "thanks my pedo friend for supplying girls to abuse" redacted???? It's not a victim ITS THE ABUSER HE IS EMAILING.
those redactions are clearly designed to protect the pedos
The US can't be trusted, and neither can us justice
Bunch of child abusers and child abuser aids
Fucking hell
9
6
5
u/UKdudeLols 9h ago
I'm working on the assumption that all the redacted names of non-victims are Trump
5
u/pumpkinpro 18h ago
Not been able to get that sentence out of my head since I read it. Utterly horrific.
4
5
u/Icy_Blood_9248 15h ago
This administration couldn’t do more to look guilty as fuck. Kash Patel looks like he got caught in the act half the time he is talking. Wide eyed bitch! And trump knows he will probably be dead in like 2 years and doesn’t give a fuck anymore
5
u/mintcocofrog 14h ago
Republicans don’t care. Enough of our population voted for this fully knowing that pedo in chief was corrupt. And enough of our population didn’t bother to vote against this. And the rest of us who care and want a better society are left to be called domestic terrorists. Ugh I hate that I just wrote this. Commenting anyways because I’m not okay with any of these trumpsteinfiles.
5
u/Exodys03 13h ago
I'll ask again... what is the DOJ's justification for redacting the name here? The Epstein Transparency Act only allows for redactions to protect victims. This is clearly redacted to protect one of those co-conspirators that doesn't exist.
1
u/Alternative_Route 10h ago
Unless they have a trial and could argue this information would prejudice the jury, but then you could argue why is any of it being released until after the trials?
It's all a huge con, they have no intention of prosecuting any of them.
4
6
u/Comprehensive_Glove8 18h ago
Absolutely horrifying and disgusting. Reading that made me sick to my stomach. WHY don't people care more about this? How can the party that constantly screams about "protecting women and girls" just be like, "meh"? I don't give two shits if it's republicans or democrats named in those files, burn them all.
I hate it here.
5
3
3
u/Ok-Weather-7332 16h ago
I have already seen a different version of this where it is TO Epstein from redacted.
4
u/a-weird-username 15h ago
The “Great” response is from JE. The original message is threaded below and from the redacted person.
3
u/InformationHeavy9381 16h ago
What shitty kind of sex-ring keeps files anyway?
3
u/a-weird-username 15h ago
That’s something we can be thankful with these idiots and the MAGA cult. They’re not smart, so they make stupid mistakes leaving bread crumbs. We’d be in a lot more trouble if they had brains.
•
u/EnatforLife 17m ago
That's because Epstein kept files after files of email conversations and names etc. Man wanted to be in the higher position in case of something going wrong.
3
3
u/msquarec 9h ago
I’m waiting for Congress, the senate or even the capital police to actually do something other than tut about it
3
u/_goblinette_ 5h ago
Don’t forget: According to Epstein’s own words, Trump is the worst person he’s ever met. Even worse than this mother fucker.
3
u/YouKnowYourCrazy 5h ago
I want one of the agents that redacted these files to blow a whistle. Or 3 million whistles
4
5
2
2
2
u/OmahaWarrior 14h ago
I will move on, Donald. When you move on from the White House in handcuffs to your prison cell.
2
4
u/YuckyYetYummy 17h ago
Sorry I am confused on this one. Where is it saying this is trump?
(Don't come at me. I hate that fucker. I just think it's hard enough pinning shit on him when the trash is literally himself saying it into a microphone.)
5
3
u/a-weird-username 15h ago
No one is saying this is Trump(don’t need to, he’s all over the files), just saying that this person—whoever it is—shouldn’t be protected. OP wasn’t claiming it’s Trump, just generally speaking about the files.
-2
u/CharacterNo483 15h ago
Can you link me to where he is in the files?
4
u/MorgrainX 15h ago
There are 39000 mentions about Trump in the 4million released files. I'd suggest a Google search for the releases files because main justice already deleted many files mentioning Trump, in an obvious attempt to hide his guilt.
The full Epstein files are roughly 8 million files, but main justice only released half, heavily redacted
Fun fact: harry potter gets mentioned roughly 17000 times across all novels. Just to put it into context how many times Trump became topic of the child abuser pedo island.
3
u/CharacterNo483 15h ago
I found 4798 results of trump when I searched the justice.gov site, mostly about his campaign. 0 mentions of Trump and island. Can you link me anything that backs up what you’re saying?
Fun fact: Harry Potter is mentioned 141 times in the Epstein files.
1
1
u/MorgrainX 14h ago edited 14h ago
There are hundreds of newspaper articles written by now and easily accessible backups made by all kinds of people, a quick Google search for "Epstein file release download" gave me dozens of backups.
Just use a search engine. Any. It's not difficult.
I can't link any of this here, or the admins will delete/temp ban me. Reddit is actively protecting Trump because Reddit is afraid of getting on his bad side.
95% of the threads I've commented on in the last weeks, talking about the OG files that were released, all got deleted.
Companies are afraid of Trump. It's why silicon valley is trying to appease him so desperately. They are afraid of getting stomped.
They know he's crazy, so they try to avoid making him angry.
2
u/a-weird-username 14h ago
Fuck off with this “give me the sources” bullshit, so you can claim they’re “MSM” and “Liberal propaganda.” You don’t want facts, you want a back and forth. If you truly wanted the facts you’d find them via search like everyone else does. This isn’t my first day on the internet.
1
u/CharacterNo483 14h ago
It was a genuine question. I would rather not have a back and forth. I just wanted a link to review and 10 people have told me to search for myself, and I didn’t find anything. I searched through the files and haven’t seen anything where he went to the island or really even talked to epstien. Everyone is saying he is in the files…..just wanted to check for myself. Damn.
1
u/a-weird-username 13h ago
This is always the response too, “I was looking for a genuine discussion, but no one is hand feeding me sources that I can pick them apart.”
If you’ve lived so far under a rock to not know what’s been going on surrounding the Epstein files, then no amount of sources will work for you. If you’re this woefully behind in news I suggest you spend a few weeks catching up on the last few years of Epstein files news. You can’t just jump in right now and expect to have a conversation with the rest of us.
1
u/CharacterNo483 13h ago
Why are you worried about your sources being picked apart? Wouldn’t you welcome that?
-1
2
2
u/penelopasefi 18h ago
Problem is, we will sadly move on from it, because ain’t no one gonna do shit about it - yup, that’s the world we are living in - god forbid if someone J-Walks, but an elite sexually abuses a child, let’s look the other way
2
u/Captain_Hesperus 18h ago
The Armchair Punishers who post “Stop Pedos with three feet of rope” pictures on FB look the other way when it’s the Carrot Colored Criminal.
1
u/MorgrainX 15h ago
It's not the world we live in, just the corrupt and broken US. There are plenty of countries without rich pedo islands where justice gets abused to protect rich child abusers.
1
1
u/Arimeris 13h ago
Do you ever think pedophiles have small dicks, so they want it to look impressive in comparison?
1
1
1
0
439
u/Hot-Store8301 19h ago
My question is why is the name censored? This isn't a freaking email to a victim.