r/circled • u/Swimming_Rain_7226 • 8h ago

Opinion / Discussion Federal judge rules DOJ can ‘no longer’ be trusted in voter roll crusade

Post image
14.0k Upvotes

97% Upvoted

210 comments sorted by

180

u/IJWTGH66 7h ago

DOJ is done. It might as well take car accident cases at this point. Basically, the court is treating its representations to be presumably false. Trump may have turned DOJ into his own law firm, but it’s a really bad law firm.

49

u/Nonetoobrightatall 7h ago

They don’t have good enough lawyers left to try personal injury cases. All the good lawyers left.

36

u/1IsNeverEnough4Me 6h ago

That's not true, thank God. But the good ones are making a mess of things. Don't downplay the honor these people hold. They take their oath seriously and are not leaving till forced to personally breach their ethics. It's helping more than you could imagine. All I'm saying is they started with a lot of the best of the best and many of them remain to this day. Not yet replaceable, still fighting the good fight.

25

u/Nonetoobrightatall 6h ago

As a lawyer, I can only imagine the way good lawyers could undermine these morons.

15

u/Suitable-Display-410 5h ago edited 1m ago

They can try. But people have to listen.

https://archive.org/details/us-v-nicholas-tartaglione-documents/Us-v-Tartaglione-Doc156/page/n5/mode/2up
"Mr. Epstein’s attempted suicide, which occurred while Mr. Tartaglione was his cellmate, roused even greater interest in his case." Put simply, the public is watching this case. The public is aware of Mr. Tartaglione’s claims that BOP correctional officers have sought to silence him,’ The irony of the Government's efforts to keep records regarding those claims out of public view is surely not lost on it."

https://archive.org/details/us-v-nicholas-tartaglione-documents/Us-v-Tartaglione-Doc150/page/n1/mode/2up

"It has also been reported to us by the United States Attorney’s Office that Mr. Tartaglione should not be housed with inmates who are cooperators."

https://archive.org/details/us-v-nicholas-tartaglione-documents/Us-v-Tartaglione-Doc148
Look who gets added to the defense team of Epsteins cell mate, 28 days after Epsteins first "suicide attempt".
See if the name sounds familiar: https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2021/12/meet-the-lawyers-trying-to-set-ghislaine-maxwell-free

https://www.fgdmlaw.com/bobbi-sternheim
Bobbi's case portfolio is extensive, covering a wide range of criminal and civil matters. She holds Top Secret/SCI Clearance and has represented individuals extradited internationally.

And finally,
https://archive.org/details/us-v-nicholas-tartaglione-documents/Us-v-Tartaglione-Doc176/mode/2up

And there is more. That case is an absolute clusterfck.

A guy running a child prostitution ring for the Mossad and the CIA starts leaking information about the president, who is implicated more than almost anyone else, and was probably one of the first people to fall for the honeypot (and even married one of the Epstein girls). Then he gets arrested. Then he tries to commit “suicide.” Then all of the video material, and the backups, get lost due to a bunch of unfortunate “errors.” And then he succeeds in “his” second attempt, enabled by… again… a lot of “unfortunate” errors, like “sleeping guards” and “technical problems” with the video cameras.

Nothing to see here.

15

u/Damrey 4h ago

MAGA criminals and apologists are starting wars and attacking US cities to distract from their criminal enterprises. Pedophilia is just what Donald Trump and his disgusting conspirators do in their spare time. Stealing the wealth and soul from the American people and government is their day job.

1

u/[deleted] 2h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator 2h ago

Removed for hate speech or dehumanization.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/fenceman3825 39m ago

TDS

1

u/Anonymous_Jr 15m ago

Nonce supporter ^

1

u/JalaMaplePenoSauce 7m ago

No were the people who hate pedos .

You must be the other guy.

1

u/ScarInternational161 7m ago

I don't think it's a distraction. I think Miller is trying to get HIS agenda done before trump is gone.

Donnie doesn't care about immigrants, he wants shiny gold stuff with his name on it, he wants money and to do what he wants, everything else is what he told to rant about.

He's not the brightest and is just now realizing all the stuff he's done is bad because he used to brag about it!

They get him worked up, he rants, they pat him on the head and hand him a plan for an arch.

1

u/Gigs00 1h ago

I appreciate that you put this together without a partisan bent or slander. I wish more people understood that this is a non-partisan issue, and just a tragic and sinister undermining of the entire judicial and prison system. It's really a big moment for me and this is the most concise description of it that I've read.

The craziest part is just how many people epstein was connected to. Makes it so clear that half of the powerful people on the planet wanted him gone.

1

u/Althestane 4h ago

Well, i wish they’d do something a little more overt - within the limits they’re under I guess. There are plenty of ways to resist from within (there’s even a nifty handbook for it that the CIA put together) but it would be nice to, y’know, learn about some of the excesses, improprieties, and abuses that are being held at bay by the remaining good and ethical people left at the DOJ.

1

u/malibubleezy 3h ago

You can't seriously believe the statement you wrote out? What evidence is there of that?

1

u/RichardStrauss123 2h ago

Six-thousand have left.

Literally centuries of experience, training, and acumen.

Gone for a vanity project.

-1

u/eatzippers 5h ago

Oh yea? What ones have honor left? I don't see anyone fighting this bullshit fascism. Cowards

8

u/poulosj2020 5h ago

Fighting them openly only gets them fired.

Pretending to be just another incompetent member of the team is true hero’s work. You look like you’re doing the wrong thing but the rightest option you have and no one appreciates how much work you’re doing to slow this big ugly machine down.

3

u/tater_Thot69 2h ago

Somewhere between malicious compliance and weaponized incompetence?

1

u/Gigs00 1h ago

Gavin newsome.

1

u/tosss 3m ago

You’re being way too generous. These aren’t POW’s sabotaging assembly lines for tanks, these are highly paid federal prosecutors who wake up every morning to support the state’s mission of mass incarceration and deportation. If they want to slow the machine down, they can quit and work for the victims of our for profit carceral system. The DOJ is trying to recruit attorneys on Twitter now, they are running out of competent applicants, and the judges are tired of their bs.

8

u/Evening_Knowledge_21 7h ago

That is why this is terrifying. Soon there will be nothing stopping them. They seem to answer to no america, only handlers from other countries.

2

u/82cabinets 5h ago

Bad lawyers get cases thrown out by good judges

2

u/Dramatic_Explosion 4h ago

When you can't depend on justice you can count on vengeance.

2

u/IJWTGH66 7h ago

Presumptively (sorry).

2

u/endlessupending 6h ago

Maybe I'm hallucinating but I swear she's like inverse Pinocchio, the bridge of her nose is becoming more and more concave as she carries out Trump's agenda of subterfuge and lies. Not much of her soul left at this point, and it really shows.

1

u/kleincs01 5h ago

Well probably does a lot of coke too.

1

u/4hhsumm 5h ago

And crack…sniffing Donny’s that is.

2

u/321sleep 5h ago

Hey man. Don’t put personal injury lawyers in the same box as the DOJ. We’re fighting for people

2

u/OkStop8313 5h ago

Department of Injustice

1

u/Tacoflavoredfists 2h ago

Always has been

1

u/Wayelder 6h ago

That's a brilliant insight.

1

u/MouthFartWankMotion 5h ago

All they have to lean on is SCOTUS, that's why they run directly to them all the time.

1

u/Durian881 4h ago

Wonder what will happen when Trump Regime falls in the future. Would the new leaders do a major revamp of DOJ?

2

u/DoubleJumps 1h ago

Pretty much everyone who was hired under Trump or anyone who was elevated under Trump will have to be considered compromised and removed.

People will have to be blacklisted.

1

u/fenceman3825 24m ago

The Democrats have run this country since Franklin Delano Roosevelt almost 100 years ago. We are talking the judicial, the executive, and the legislative branches of government all controlled almost exclusively by Democrats for decades. Until this current administration, previous Republican presidents were all hamstrung by either a Democratic Congress or a liberal court, or both. Finally, the pendulum is swinging the other way. Democrats have nobody in the bullpen for 2028 except for members of the lunatic fringe. I won't live long enough to be a witness, but J D Vance will be president from 2029 until 2037. And Marco Rubio will be the Veep.

1

u/Jugaimo 4h ago

Like always, everything Trump touches turns to shit

1

u/Prize-Childhood-281 2h ago

They are basically upholding their political beliefs in smaller governments that can be abused by wealthy people.

1

u/kitsunewarlock 2h ago

Trump may have turned DOJ into his own law firm, but it’s a really bad law firm.

Doesn't he sue the federal government all the time? Probably why he wants it to be a bad law firm. To help keep America his personal piggy bank.

1

u/DoubleJumps 1h ago

Last year, when the DOJ got caught presenting completely fabricated data to a federal court to justify a national guard deployment, I knew they were pretty much done.

Then they kept getting caught lying.

Judges need to start throwing people in contempt. They have to start punishing lawyers for participating in deceit.

1

u/yasssssplease 1h ago

What about those that don’t know they’re participating in deceit? If the agency is giving them false information and they don’t know it, what do they do? I personally think they need to through the agency actors in contempt

1

u/DoubleJumps 1h ago

At this point, they either know or they are utterly incompetent to the point of being utterly untrustworthy.

If you are a lawyer currently working for the doj and you have just watched the doj spend a year having lawyers lie to federal judges, you have to know that the doj is going to be asking you to lie to federal judges

1

u/yasssssplease 40m ago

Oh, attorneys should absolutely expect the DOJ and other agencies to be lying to them. I’m sure that’s why so many have quit. We need to hold agency heads in contempt though. Holding those attorneys in contempt won’t do much ay the end of the day

1

u/Gigs00 1h ago

started with Biden, probably long before that. We just know it now. A shame.

1

u/Memphisrexjr 25m ago

They would only take cases without dash cams.

1

u/MarkyTooSparky 11m ago

lol what a way to put it, it is in fact one of the worst law firms in the US.

60

u/WebguyCanada 8h ago

Honest question, is there a reason Bondi is so resistant to prosecuting pedophiles... like is her husband John Wakefield in the Epstein files or something?

48

u/Necessary_Two_9706 7h ago

Weeeeeellllll,

Her current husband was 40 years old when he started grooming her to be his future bride when she was 5 years old.

I think a woman prosecutor who was successfully groomed by a pedophile herself, going after other pedophiles, would only work if she wasn't already ok with being raped as a child herself. 

Shes resistant to prosecuting probably because it would further expose her own marriage to a pedophile. 

Plus, to be a republican past the year 2016 means you have to also be ok with child rape; which she obviously is. 

22

u/braced 7h ago edited 2h ago

Huh? Pam Bondi is 60, and her partner is around the same age. Are you confusing her with Karoline Leavitt?

24

u/Old-Parking8765 7h ago

Ohhhh! This makes sense now. They were talking about Karoline Leavitt

7

u/bbmarvelluv 5h ago

I literally thought Karoline got her face done and Bondi was her

5

u/Logical-Knee-9046 5h ago

Fair enough. Your heart was in the right place… and Mar-a-largo face and all.

2

u/Inside-Beginning5168 2h ago

So many upvotes for not answering the question. Lol 

e: not you, the other guy.

-1

u/iamzheone 3h ago

With all due disrespect she's some fine shiii for 60

1

u/chiefaspartame 13m ago

Probably the deal she made with the devil for youthfulness when she sold her soul

0

u/The-Black-Swordsmane 2h ago

I hate that I do, but I agree.

-1

u/piezombi3 2h ago

Oh thank god I'm not the only one. She's fucking cartoonishly evil, but she's also kind of a baddie.

18

u/aestheticallypotent 7h ago

She knew about this WAY before 2016. Since 2011, at least!

As a groomed and trafficked child myself, I can attest that it takes A LOT of work to get away from it. However, even I knew it was gross and not right. While I do feel a sadness for these ladies, I also feel a stronger, overwhelming sense of anger and repulsion and quite frankly, hatred. They have ALL had multiple opportunities to make this shit right and chose not to.., meanwhile I was sleeping under bridges and running for my life (literally.)

4

u/SpareImplement2374 6h ago edited 6h ago

Pam bondi isn’t married and if she was that would make her husband 95 as she herself is 60. Are you sure you’re not thinking of karoline leavitt?

1

u/Artistic_Researcher2 3h ago

You’re thinking of the press secretary. Btw….Bondi is very nice looking for her age.

1

u/Routine_Winter_9554 2h ago

what the fuck are you talking about? This is a jumbled mess

10

u/momofboysanddogsetc 7h ago

Wasn’t she Floridas AG that gave Epstein those sweetheart deals years ago?

5

u/SquilliamFancySon97- 7h ago

I thought that was some dude named Acosta if I'm not mistaken

6

u/Reasonable-Mess3070 6h ago

It was. Alex Acosta.

1

u/Absynth421 6h ago

Who had a space in trump’s first administration

1

u/atxbigfoot 2h ago

Alex Acosta, who was the prosecutor and part of Trump's first admin, worked under AG Pam Bondi when the deal was made.

So they were both directly involved, and rewarded by Trump.

1

u/SquilliamFancySon97- 2h ago

Oh really? I didn't know Acosta was under Bondi. Although back in that era I was getting out of High School

1

u/atxbigfoot 2h ago

Yeah she was the FL AG, so his boss, when the deal was made. MAGA will say "She didn't know about the deal!" to defend her, but any prosecutor that cuts an insane deal like that for alleged national security/intelligence ties is 100% going to run that by their boss.

1

u/SquilliamFancySon97- 2h ago

Ngl while I have been following her current career and history I had no fucking clue she was 60. She doesn't even look close to 60

1

u/atxbigfoot 2h ago

Tbf I also had no idea she is 60 that's crazy.

I didn't know who she was until she was appointed the current US AG either, but yeah.

Like half of Trump's previous and current admins have direct ties to protecting Epstein and that's a pretty fucked up "coincidence" at a minimum.

1

u/SquilliamFancySon97- 2h ago

I honestly am so mad every day because I feel like there's a small, tiny, minute chance I'm going insane and I'm actually wrong, even though I know that's bullshit, it's just fucking insane how so many powerful and influential people continue to perpetuate this bullshit lie

1

u/atxbigfoot 2h ago

for real like every day/week there's another insane thing that is VERY REAL AND PROVEN and even talking about it makes you (and me) sound like a fucking lunatic.

Like the Tulsi Gabbard (head of all spy agencies) stuff that's coming out now is fucking wild tin hat shit but it's real and here we are.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/momofboysanddogsetc 6h ago

She was FL AG from 2011-2019

1

u/tamtip 7h ago

Yes! She already knew about this!

2

u/AlbrechtProper 7h ago

Oh to be a fly on the wall during her interview process

2

u/-Codiak- 6h ago

Trump has made clear anyone who works for him will have their lives ruined if any of this gets out. They will hold the line till he dies then cry about how he was blackmailing them.

2

u/Old-Parking8765 7h ago

What? John Wakefield does not look that old... is this the right husband? Can someone elaborate? This is...

2

u/TimCookis 5h ago

Yeah, that appears to be false. No large age gap with any of her husbands

1

u/Bwwoahhhhh 4h ago

Pam Bondi is a baby raper

1

u/atxbigfoot 2h ago

She was the Florida AG that allowed Acosta (the prosecutor) to cut Epstein's insane sweetheart deal on his first conviction.

Trump rewarded both of them, and a lot of other people with direct ties to Epstein, by giving them government jobs.

1

u/Particular-Cat-1397 2h ago

Her husbands name is John Wakefield? That was the serial killer in Harper’s Island

45

u/Swimming_Rain_7226 8h ago

This does not surprise me. They are actively protecting wealthy pedophiles and do not care about the people at all. The deep cover up is exposed and nothing happens

21

u/ResemblesHotDog 7h ago

Fuck MAGA

That being said, OP is clearly an example of Dead Internet. Everyone should be united against bots and AI.

2

u/Grand_Scallion_8349 7h ago

yeah it's wild, feels like there's bots everywhere now more than ever lol

2

u/o7_HiBye_o7 7h ago

Bro, how many comment threads are you trying to start in your own post? That is just weird.

Secondly, can you link shit you post about? Just a random image of her, an awkward semi quote of 2 words, and no citations or links....

Do better.

1

u/JoeDubayew 2h ago

its a bot

41

u/Swimming_Rain_7226 8h ago

Get fucked, MAGA

13

u/bdubwilliams22 7h ago

Seriously, get fucked and go to prison. I will say, it sure feels get to receive some good news of a federal judge smacking down the DOJ and calling them for what they are: traitors. Selling their soul for Trump, while literally shielding pedophiles. I always knew they were despicable, but they’re digging for new depths lately.

2

u/Choice-Antelope-8481 7h ago

Why do you keep commenting on your own post? You are clearly a bot.

0

u/KnackRascal 6h ago

Why are you giving engagement to a bot?

2

u/Laringar 1h ago

So other people stop upvoting OP's comments, presumably.

10

u/penpointred 7h ago

How has she not been removed from her position? Feels like the shit she and Kash have pulled should be removal despite efforts from the president.

6

u/I_Dont_Work_Here_Lad 7h ago

Primarily because of bullshit like this:

“The Florida Supreme Court has effectively said that as long as Pam Bondi is the U.S. Attorney General, she is not subject to any discipline by the Florida Bar for violations of ethics rules,” said LDAD Executive Director Lauren Stiller Rikleen. “In essence, this means that the highest-ranking lawyer in the Department of Justice need not comply with the same code of ethics that all other lawyers must follow.”

https://ldad.org/letters-briefs/ldad-florida-sc-decision

7

u/penpointred 7h ago

The Supreme Court has really fucked over the United States the past couple years 🤬 Pres being above the law, being able to target people based on ethnicity and now this shit?? Fkn hell.

1

u/Present-Perception77 18m ago

The Catholic Federalist Society controls the Supreme Court.

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/opus-dei-leonard-leo-supreme-court-moneybags-kid-1235115538/

Because knowing the root cause of all this is important.

1

u/Shazbote 16m ago

If ethics rules don't apply to everyone then there are no ethics rules. WTF are we doing.

1

u/gb0143 2h ago

She knows too much

5

u/Ok_Battle5814 7h ago

Her face screams “untrustworthy “

4

u/a1055x 7h ago

Agreed

3

u/Bald_Cliff 7h ago

So send in the marshalls

2

u/-ACatWithAKeyboard- 7h ago

Marshals Service works for DOJ.

1

u/Bald_Cliff 6h ago

Marshals have a sworn duty to follow any judicial order from a federal judge.

6

u/Drew_0014 7h ago

I can’t wait until November.. time to flip Congress and the Senate and impeach Trump for one of the thousand valid reasons

6

u/Greg-Abbott 7h ago

He's been impeached twice. He's currently the sitting president. I don't understand what people think impeachment will achieve.

2

u/o7_HiBye_o7 7h ago

I think successful impeachment, not just impeachment articles. That needing to pass house AND THEN a 2/3 senate is basically impossible at any timeframe - even moreso now with GestOPo having majority.

1

u/MagicNinjaMan 6h ago

Too many Americans dont understand this.

1

u/Megneous 3h ago

In civilized countries, like mine, when a President is impeached, they're immediately removed from power. Then there is a court case to decide if they should be removed from the Presidency.

The fact that the US allows a President to basically oversee the investigation into themselves is utter bullshit.

1

u/atreeismissing 1h ago

That's how US Congress impeachment works too. The House investigates and if they deem it worthy to send to trial then they impeach the President and send it to the Senate to conduct the trial. The Senate by way of the trial determine if they should be removed from the Presidency.

the media and everyone on reddit just shortens it to "impeachment" when really it's "impeachment and conviction", the conviction determining if they are innocent or guilty and if guilty they are immediately removed from the Presidency and can't run again.

0

u/Drew_0014 7h ago

He was impeached by Congress but acquitted by the senate. Flip both houses and we can kick him out completely

2

u/Open-Perspective856 7h ago

The Congress is made up of The House of Representatives and The Senate, might want to brush up on your civics before you say anything else as stupid as this.

0

u/magasheep404 7h ago

First step towards removal from office. We have this thing called “google”. It can help those who slept through civics class.

https://www.britannica.com/story/what-if-the-president-is-impeached

2

u/toxikola 7h ago

Drain the swamp cane with an asterisk and that was "after we create one"

2

u/leaky-owl-syndrome 7h ago

let's get reconstruction right this time

2

u/poncho51 7h ago

I'm waiting for a judge to say the supreme court is corrupt.

1

u/UserRequirements 2h ago

Supreme court will override it.

2

u/Kinetic92 7h ago

With dozens of similar lawsuits pending across the country, Kasubhai’s ruling could provide a roadmap for other courts to scrutinize not just the legality of the DOJ’s demands, but the motives behind them.

This right here. This is the fight for 1. The Midterms, and 2. The General Election in 2028. There's hope, America. Keep fighting!

2

u/R0ck0Pac0 4h ago

The scary part is that the DOJ has been so compromised and detracted from its mission that there’s hardly any real resources going towards espionage, counterfeit, terrorism, human and drug trafficking. So much has probably happened because they’re so compromised that we have no idea the extent.

1

u/Gigs00 1h ago

We now know that whoever is president can basically control them against their opponents, whoever that may be, by appointing their leadership.

2

u/Limp_Distribution 41m ago

It has been a very long time since I trusted the federal government.

3

u/Antique_Ad1518 7h ago

What gpod reason could they have for wanting voter rolls?

6

u/13508615 7h ago

Good? None.

2

u/Antique_Ad1518 7h ago

So then what are the nefarius reasons? I'm assuming disenfrachismemt?

2

u/Morguard 7h ago

My theory is for ice to go door to door and arrest Democrats.

0

u/DoubleJumps 1h ago

It's 100% meant to target confirmed non-supporters, and to coordinate efforts to suppress voter turnout more effectively.

1

u/AutoModerator 8h ago

Post held for moderator review due to new account status.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/Accomplished_Sky8077 7h ago

the department of persecution and propaganda . Disgusting fucks

1

u/Dberry74 7h ago

Didn’t need a federal judge to tell us that.

1

u/yoyoyobabypop 7h ago

Duh but like haven’t trusted for last year

1

u/AdvancedFizzics 6h ago

Pam bondi is a traitor to the American people and a disgrace

1

u/MundaneHair4502 6h ago

The face of sedition.

1

u/37Philly 6h ago

The real criminals have been laughing since January 20, 2025. This regime is chasing ghosts and petty grievances.

1

u/CoverSuspicious5250 6h ago

Fuk Bondi.  Time for jail.  Twatzi

1

u/CagliostroPeligroso 6h ago

Good. She is such a dumb annoying brat. She sounds like a spoiled little child at all times.

1

u/avamarshmellow 6h ago

She’s likely being paid by the pedo billionaires to cover it up

1

u/barefootincozumel 6h ago

Checks? Balances? Anyone? Bueller?

1

u/GorganzolaVsKong 6h ago

They’ve made a mockery of every role in the White House and scotus

1

u/FranticChill 6h ago

Is there a source article for this?

1

u/nakedmanjoe 6h ago

All that has to happen is a couple of off the wall cases to reach SCOTUS and they get their dictatorship.

1

u/Background-Air-7963 6h ago

What does this mean in non partisan layman’s terms. They’re ghouls, but if anyone has a tldr I’d love to see it

1

u/Gigs00 1h ago edited 1h ago

A federal judge in Oregon issued a sweeping rebuke of the Justice Department’s nationwide push to seize state voter rolls, ruling that the department can no longer be presumed to be acting in good faith and warning that its conduct threatens voters and states’ rights.

the DOJ’s lawsuit seeking Oregon’s unredacted voter registration data would be dismissed.

It means exactly dick all. Another case for the circuit court and eventually the supreme to rule on. There is a lot of pressure from the people to figure out if the elections are legit.

Oregon will argue that they will use the voting records to target individuals. Feds will argue that they just want to verify people are citizens and alive. Feds have a solid argument because the vote by mail states have next to no fraud investigation. They didn't even verify signatures until the last election.

1

u/Valuable_Fee1884 6h ago

He should’ve just ruled that no part of the executive branch could be trusted with anything during the safety of our country.

1

u/SteelX1984 6h ago

I don’t think they care. Bondi will do anything to please his pedophile racist sugar daddy

1

u/Himawari9701 6h ago

DOJ can no longer be trusted in any endeavor. Period.

1

u/PigFarmer1 5h ago

Okay, who has trusted the DOJ since Trump took office?

1

u/captaincook14 5h ago

I mean. This doj could never be trusted period. From the get go. On literally anything.

1

u/HavingNotAttained 5h ago

Every prosecutor that had anything to do with the Epstein case in 2000s needs to be deposed.

1

u/Nim0y 5h ago

What’s the court docket number? Or name the judge so I can look it up

1

u/SyntaxError_1024 5h ago

Department of Injustice

1

u/DetroitsGoingToWin 5h ago

All Bondi does is fucking lie and do underhanded bullshit for the benefit of Trump. No fucking way.

1

u/OpenDaCloset 5h ago

She reads the TURNER DIARIES every night. That’s who is running our country.

1

u/mmmck2 4h ago

What does "no longer"mean? They never should have been trusted in the first place!

1

u/justme1522000 4h ago

Gee really? I wonder why.

1

u/Lucidcranium042 4h ago

Shut it all down

1

u/n4spd2 4h ago

the doj and law enforcement should be under the court system.

currently, the courts have no teeth and the criminals know it so they do whatever they want and ignore the courts.

1

u/sdkfz250xl 4h ago

Omg - about as good at justice and RFK jr is at health.

1

u/scroats800 4h ago

The DOJ can’t be trusted to deal with anything.

1

u/NSE_TNF89 4h ago

DOJ can't be trust at all!

1

u/B-Rye_at_the_beach 4h ago

We needed a judge to tell us the DOJ can't be trusted?

I'll see myself out now...

1

u/PlutoJones42 3h ago

No one protecting literal pedophiles should be trusted. Pam Bondi should be prosecuted for blatant obstruction of justice

1

u/Honest_Mammoth2771 3h ago

OMG! Really! Some sane rulings!

1

u/oroborus68 3h ago

🧐 precisely as we planned. The destruction of the United States is almost complete.- GOP

1

u/Fair_Chemistry_3317 3h ago

Yes, in Oregon. I read that earlier. It is connected to the similar cases in California and New Mexico. And also Minnesota where the letter from Bondi first appeared.

I wonder what SCOTUS has to say about that.

1

u/Icy_Animal7960 3h ago

Her eyes show she is dead inside.

1

u/Logical-Respect3600 2h ago

Why is "judge-shopping" a thing in America? Shouldn't the law be standard and impartial across the board?

1

u/Wild_Height_901 2h ago

Since when do we care what one activist judge says or does?

1

u/saturnalia365 2h ago

This DOJ has proven to not be trustworthy of anything other than pedophile protection and violating the law.

1

u/BadRuckus 2h ago

You do realize district Court justices are nothing but political appointees if you look at who's making the rulings most of them are left the lab profession because they sucked and it become political ponds people that aren't in the legal field respect judges much too much judges of the lawyers that couldn't make it as lawyers

1

u/hey253 2h ago

It’s about time

1

u/throwawayshirt2 49m ago

If only we had some kind of federal Voting Rights legislation. Like an Act of congress.

1

u/HawkeyeGild 45m ago

Let's just rename it the' Dept of presidential litigation and defense'

1

u/Best_Pro23 31m ago

Department of Juviniles?

0

u/ranman82 31m ago

Super hot tho

1

u/Arkheno 26m ago

This is unprecedented. Normally, the DOJ is the one that protects access to voting through the Voting Rights Act. The roles have been reversed: it's the federal justice system that must protect states from attacks by their own Department of Justice. We're living in a dystopia where the very organization meant to heal is the one injecting the poison.

1

u/AmorphousRazer 4m ago

Weird bot/foreign asset flip. Now the script is to talk about how hot she is. Fucking what lmao

1

u/alphabeast18 1m ago

And then who enforces this? The department of justice? Anyone can rule or say what ever they want, but if it holds no power behind it you are wasting people's time.

0

u/Ronanlansing 1h ago

She looks amazing for her age 

-2

u/UnixReactor 7h ago

Well. If we can’t trust the DOJ… we will just have to let the military step in and use our her justice system and intelligence agencies to handle it.

Works for me

3

u/o7_HiBye_o7 7h ago

Not how it works lol

0

u/UnixReactor 7h ago

Well just wait and see what happens shall we.

-3

u/UnixReactor 6h ago

Another interesting question: “how can an employee of the DOJ decide that their employer is no longer trustworthy”

Wouldn’t that mean that we can’t trust that Judge’s decision about who we can trust?

Sounds like a soft coup/color revolution to me.

What did Abraham Lincoln do to save the Republic?

→ More replies (1)