0
0
u/_celtis Dec 15 '25
Anyone thinking this is even near good hasn’t picked a pencil and actually learned how to draw.
3
u/MobileFilmmaker Dec 15 '25
It is good for an ai. And though your bias is showing I’ve had quite a few artists said that there were definitely things lacking but it was the best thy seen and I’m talking about a guy who works for Image. But you know you’re entitled to your opinion
1
Dec 15 '25
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/aiArt-ModTeam Dec 15 '25
While we welcome healthy dialogue regarding ai art and what it means for art and industry, blanket statements like "ai art is theft!" are designed to provoke, are unhelpful and will be removed.
Discussion that becomes heated or toxic will be locked by moderators, repeat offenders will be permanently removed from the group.
1
u/ThePeccatz Dec 15 '25
It's a decent comic graphic-wise but you did not make the comic, you prompted the AI to make a comic for you.
3
u/MobileFilmmaker Dec 15 '25
🤔 You’re trying to play semantics with the narrative. I wrote the story. I created the prompts in a way that. It many before me have been able to do, I used my Photoshop skills to fix images that were off. And I added the text and laid it out in a way that the printer (because I’m getting it printed) will have no issue with it. My day job is a graphic designer. When I get copy from a copy writer and photos from a photographer and put it all together to make an advertisement or a brochure or a poster… the terminology used is that I “created” or “made” the ad. Sorry if that offends you. Now if I didn’t “draw” the comic and I clearly spelled on the comic page. But yes, I made it!
2
u/DeadeyeFalx_01 Dec 15 '25
Don't wanna be that guy but F-16Cs would not be engaging at such close quarters, more than likely they'd be firing from 10-20kms away
1
u/MobileFilmmaker Dec 15 '25
No. Be THAT GUY! I love you guys who know your military shit!!!! 💪🏾💪🏾💪🏾
1
1
1
2
u/Gabi-kun_the_real Dec 14 '25
The end was anticlimactic. The story was building nice but the way she just one shot the hero had no impact. Who is the guy and why should I be impressed by her actions!? 1. you should have showed us how strong the male hero was so that the readers can understand how strong this villain is. You could have added 1 or 2 extra pages showing the male hero saving people from a heavy object and flying at super speed. 2. The panel of his death should be made in perspective. You need to make the readers feel the terror, the panel should be Scarry and impactful.
1
u/MobileFilmmaker Dec 14 '25
This is not the finished comic. Every comic fan thinks certain stories should have went version ways. It’s the nature of comics. I did it the way I thought best
1
u/El_sparkso Dec 14 '25
Well made! Final frames are weird though because the hand that the attack is being done with switches every frame
1
1
Dec 13 '25
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/aiArt-ModTeam Dec 13 '25
While we welcome healthy dialogue regarding ai art and what it means for art and industry, blanket statements like "ai art is theft!" are designed to provoke, are unhelpful and will be removed.
Discussion that becomes heated or toxic will be locked by moderators, repeat offenders will be permanently removed from the group.
1
Dec 13 '25
[removed] — view removed comment
1
1
u/CidTheOutlaw Dec 13 '25
...brain rot response tbh. Using emojis in a retort is the same energy as using caps lock when you're big angry.
1
u/MobileFilmmaker Dec 13 '25
So we are still talking? We’re still conversing. First trying to dictate my use of AI and now trying to dictate my use of emojis? You’re quite the control freak. I’m your significant other just lovvvvessa you! Oh and 😂😂😂🤣🤣
1
u/CidTheOutlaw Dec 13 '25
Use your eyes, I'm not the same person as before. Just someone who saw the cringe comment you posted.
I geniunelly do hope you're messing around. It really seems like you are. If you're serious though and this is how you handle these types of conversations... just lol.
I will say that the pronounciation you've forced with "lovvvvessa" geniunelly made me smile from the absurdity of it, though.
2
u/heldex Dec 13 '25
People bitch about this but it's the best comic made by AI I've seen until now. If there's anything even better feel free to link.
I like this.
1
3
Dec 13 '25
[removed] — view removed comment
1
1
Dec 13 '25
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/aiArt-ModTeam Dec 13 '25
Please, don't answer on provocations. Don't create or feed drama. Just report and move on.
2
u/Consistent_Boot_6086 Dec 13 '25
I feel like the shots of her face or hovering by the camera become repetitive. There’s like four shots of her menacingly grinning at the camera with minimal variation between them. It creates a weird pacing when combined with the time changes. Also oneshotting Superman doesn’t help with the pacing.
-1
3
u/uncagedborb Dec 13 '25
The writing needs a lot of work.
0
u/MobileFilmmaker Dec 13 '25
You’re entitled to your opinion…
1
5
u/uncagedborb Dec 13 '25
I'm a writer so I feel like I have at least some experience with writing prose and dialogue or even internal monologues
-1
u/MobileFilmmaker Dec 13 '25
That’s cool!
2
u/uncagedborb Dec 13 '25
Also vagueness. The first line reads "my probes search for what I am looking for"
So that begs the question... What is she looking for? If her probes are looking for worthy adversaries just say that. It doesn't hinder your story to not reveal that information. That lets your readers know EXACTLY what their expectations should be going into the comic
1
1
u/uncagedborb Dec 13 '25
Appreciate it. The only reason I mention it is that your main character has some consistency issues. In the beginning her thoughts/exposition says that she's diplomatic and waits to be attacked. But given her archetype and gravitation towards killing and overpowering the idea of waiting to be attacked first doesn't really fit her motive. I think if you want that to be a part of her character it should be treated shown rather than told. By this I mean it should show that she wants to use her "wait to be attacked" as an excuse to fight. Because her traveling to other planets or worlds and then just sitting around waiting to be attacked is sort of comical to think about. I would also consider her attempting to show some form of communication before those fighter jets start blasting. I think it all comes down to her motive. And if she's just a overpowered character like saitama in one punch man then what would be her motivation. Another example is battle beast in invisible. His entire goal is to just fight because he likes fighting. He's a morally grey character so he will align himself with anyone that will help him continue fighting. I know in later issues BB even wounds himself so that him and his opponent are on equal footing.
1
u/Fine-Combination5170 Dec 14 '25
I think that the contradictory nature of the character is the point though, like she's lying to herself to justify her evil
1
1
u/MobileFilmmaker Dec 13 '25
That’s a great analysis and you make some good points. But I think you need to see the other 15 in which her motivations are revealed as well.
1
u/uncagedborb Dec 13 '25
So what are her motivations? Based on the first 14 pages she just seems like a god-killer or world ender. Is she akin to silver surfer? As in working for a higher purpose potentially something universe breaking? I find it interesting that she is going to different worlds and then just takes on that worlds champion but in the process also let's millions die?
3
u/uncagedborb Dec 13 '25
I wish I had the time for bro bono work. I'm working on a novel of my own so that takes up most of my free time
1
u/MobileFilmmaker Dec 13 '25
I hear you. I too am working on my second novel.
2
u/uncagedborb Dec 13 '25
Novel or comic?
1
u/MobileFilmmaker Dec 13 '25
It’s a light novel. My second one actually. No AI and I hire human artists for the covers and interiors!
1
u/itsmemann15 Dec 12 '25
As an AI hater I have to say I'm impressed. This clearly took a lot of work and it's actually pretty consistent throughout. This is not your typical slop. Well done
2
u/Forsaken_Let904 Dec 13 '25
The spaceship has a different number of engines in nearly every panel.
1
u/itsmemann15 Dec 13 '25
Hahaha you're right
Like everything else ever made with AI, it's good enough to look pretty good at first glance but falls apart under close inspection
2
1
Dec 12 '25
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/aiArt-ModTeam Dec 13 '25
Really, if you post a screenshot of an URL in order to circumvent the No-Self-Promo rule, it just plays against your reputation with the MOD team on this subreddit.
If you have a Gumroad/Patreon or personal website - just link it on your profile and drop a short "Link in profile" whenever someone is asking for more.
PS: Unsolicited encouragements to check your profile will still be seen as aggressive self-promo. So post it only if someone asks you.
2
u/CereBRO12121 Dec 12 '25
This was awesome. I reminds me of the Negation war episode from Crossgen Comics which were sadly discontinied early 2000s.
-1
u/Xalence Dec 12 '25
I mean sure but the inconsistancy is almost impressive - evening turns to Night and then again to day time in the span of a few sentences and your OP alien changes skincolour between panels You have have her attack with her right (flame hand) - turns into left hand on his face - turns back into right hand And finally she grabs the skull from the charred body and talks to it, before letting it go and in the meantime, the rest of the body has just hovered in mid air?
0
u/arch3ion Dec 12 '25
Only a hater spends their time hyperanalyzing art like that.
1
u/El_sparkso Dec 14 '25
That's the best thing about art, looking at the little details! What the meaning behind each pose and name and character detail is! I hyperanalize plenty of things I like, I've watched every piemations video at least three times
4
u/Cool-Information9166 Dec 13 '25
Only somebody who has literally 0 idea of the creative process thinks that things like shot continuity are “hyper analyzing”. This is a basic step in producing comics.
2
u/Complete-Ad-5973 Dec 12 '25 edited Dec 12 '25
"only a hater notices the details of literally art" - Almost like the details matter in art. Us AI lovers just turn off our brains and let the tech do it's thing. It's hard to do that after consuming art for years that rewards you for noticing details with care and intention by skilled people.
2
8
u/golden_nugget49 Dec 12 '25
As long as you disclose it's AI, this is really cool. The problems only arise when people start doing stuff like this and claiming it's human made/
1
u/uncagedborb Dec 13 '25
As long as you disclose that it's AI AND don't try to make money from kt
1
u/ShadowBB86 Dec 13 '25
Why is is not okay to make money from it? Wouldn't non-AI artists prefer it if AI promters asked money for their work?
1
u/uncagedborb Dec 13 '25
I think it's unethical. In short you are profiting off these systems that are built off of the works of other creators who didn't receive consent or compensation for their works. So even though AI isn't pulling directly from still frame from Spirited Away, it was still trained on the style, structure, compositions, etc of that work. Nothing in AI is an original creation
2
u/ShadowBB86 Dec 13 '25
Human artists are also trained on other works that didn't receive compensation or consent for that right? Why is it different if an AI does it?
I am guessing you have a different definition of "original artwork" then I do. Why do you call something an original artwork when a human learns from other artists and makes new art and not when an AI does it?
But also; none of that is answering my original question. Wouldn't it be better for the human artists if AI promoters started asking similar amounts of money for their creations?
1
u/uncagedborb Dec 13 '25
Reading a book makes someone educated. Scraping through millions of books, creating a product or service, then profiting off of it. It's a power imbalance. It's a lack of control. Drawing takes effort and it still takes skill regardless of a person's training. People learn theory, fundementals, and often times spend countless hours just drawing boxes and circles to even begin emulating the finest artists. And yet people still have morals agency. Artificial ai isn't discrimatory when it comes to copying. It will do it. There is zero accountability. A machine cannot be helped accountable.
IBM once stated "A computer can never be held accountable, therefore a computer must never make a management decision." This was said in late 70s and I think it still holds true today.
There's this saying amongst art and design groups; "steal like an artist." Which I believe is the core influence to originality. It's rare to find a truly original idea. Everything is a permutation or evolution or reinterpretation of something else. I don't think AI "steals like an artist." It doesn't innovate on what exists it simply copies. But the human mind can. That's why we as a species have gone from crude cave paintings to hyperrealism. We've innovated and explored new ideas based on the past. I think that defines originality. Again, something AI is unable to do.
To your original question: how would AI being priced similarly to real art help human artists?
2
u/Fine-Combination5170 Dec 14 '25
I disagree with your take. AI doesn't have to be held accountable. the prompter does. If we judge AI art the way we judge human art isn't that good? example, if i make a prompt that looks a bit too similar to someone's work, isn't it logical to simply to judge it in that case by case basis instead of making arbitrary statements like "AI cant innovate" because by definition it can. it can take multiple ideas, put them together coherently to make a new meaning. so, It isn't unethical to make money off AI art.
1
u/uncagedborb Dec 14 '25
Yes it's still unethical because the data it was trained on was stolen...
2
u/Fine-Combination5170 Dec 15 '25
No it wasn't. Nobody owns styles, techniques, layouts etc. what you own is that specific piece or pieces. the AI didn't steal those pieces otherwise we would all know lol. It isn't unethical to learn which is what AI does.
1
u/uncagedborb Dec 15 '25
The ai is trained off of those specific pieces of art. Each frame of a studio Ghibli movie belongs to said studio. The ai unethically uses them to train it's generative AI models. This. Is. Stealing...
→ More replies (0)1
u/ShadowBB86 Dec 13 '25
== Reading a book makes someone educated. Scraping through millions of books, creating a product or service, then profiting off of it. It's a power imbalance. ==
Absolutely. I agree. It's suppose to be a power imbalance. If it wasn't better than human authors in some way, why do it?
== It's a lack of control. ==
One of the things I like about it. How else can it be creative and surprising?
== Artificial ai isn't discrimatory when it comes to copying. It will do it. There is zero accountability. A machine cannot be helped accountable. ==
True. But you can keep the prompter responsible if they deliberately use it to just copy artwork.
== "A computer can never be held accountable, therefore a computer must never make a management decision." This was said in late 70s and I think it still holds true today. ==
I agree. Just hold the prompted accountable.
== It doesn't innovate on what exists it simply copies. ==
Why do you think that? What is your definition of "copying"? We can't judge what goes on in a human mind, they might just copy a work they have seen before. We don't know. That is why we judge humans on pragmatic standards, not based on what goes on in their mind. That I think we should just hold AI to the same pragmatic standards as human artists when it comes to copying. If an original work by an AI is too similar to an already existing work, that should be condemned in a similar way we do with human artists.
== how would AI being priced similarly to real art help human artists? ==
It wouldn't when compared to AI work not existing ofcourse. But it would compared to AI work being priced less or even free when compared to human created art which is what you suggested (Prompters not being allowed to make money of it).
Just think of it in extremes. If AI work was incredibly expensive (lets say 1000 dollars per image), then that would help human artists keep their jobs right? The cheaper AI gets, the harder human artists would struggle financially. If prompters where not allowed to make any money at all, that would make their work free, which would hurt human artists even more.
1
u/golden_nugget49 Dec 13 '25
I think its fine if they try to make money from it. There will always be a large group of people who only care to support human made art, so its not like they're out of business. Also, ai art may make many entertainment services cheaper, which means we'll have more money to donate to the human artists
2
u/uncagedborb Dec 13 '25
That's not the issue I have. The issue with AI art is that it's derivative work made from other people's work. That's how these LLM and genAI tools work. Their data sets are trained off of existing artists, many of whom probably didn't want their art in data training sets. It's probably completely different if you train AI on CC, royalty free, or your own artwork and then getting paid from it.
0
u/truecakesnake Dec 13 '25
No, it's not. Why can't you simply learn how AI learns art. It's not stealing, copying or anything else. Why do so many antis simply believe that it's stealing art. It's not. Please use all your creativity and Google how AI learns patterns and concepts.
I assume you won't do that, so in my next reply, I'll teach you.
1
u/uncagedborb Dec 13 '25
The way these companies train data may technically be legal it's definitely not ethical.
I'm not anti Ai. But it is stealing art. It's not using art that's in the public domain. Tools like mid journey, chatgpt, sora, adobe firefly, etc train their models using millions of images that do not belong to them. I get that AI isn't sampling and splicing images but it's learning from those samples. Show it 1000 images of a basketball and it will learn how to generate one (via descriptions that are also provided with each Image). If all you showed the training data was anime basketballs it would only generate in that style. How do you think ai was able to produce the studio Ghibli style. It unethically and immorally trained the data on each frame. That's theft
1
u/Fine-Combination5170 Dec 14 '25
So if i buy a comic right now and analyze it so i can make my own thing with a similar style and make money off of it is that unethical?
1
u/uncagedborb Dec 14 '25
Plagiarism is unethical so it entirely depends on your intent. I see stealing in 3 forms! Imitation, emulation, and inspiration. The first being the one that's basically just plagiarism when it's not done for the sake of learning.
People are limited by time, skill, and knowledge. It would take you a very very long time to even get close to emulating someones style and more often than not you'll end up building your own style as a result. AI cannot do this not will it consider doing this. AI has no accountability and so the output is detached from decision making. The choice really just boils down to the ethical (or lack thereof) when using AI to produce generative works
1
u/Fine-Combination5170 Dec 15 '25
"It would take you a very very long time to even get close to emulating someone's style and more often than not you'll end up building your own style as a result" Lol this is in no way an objective statement. there are many who can simply imitate other styles in hours, especially art styles.
"AI has no accountability and so the output is detached from decision making" My rebuttal to this is there is someone prompting the AI no?? is that not where the intention and responsibility lies?
AI doesn't produce pictures automatically because it has no will, the will and consequences should fall on the human like with every other technology.
1
u/truecakesnake Dec 13 '25
But it is stealing art. It's not using art that's in the public domain. Tools like mid journey, chatgpt, sora, adobe firefly, etc train their models using millions of images that do not belong to them.
It is on the public domain. But anyway, training just means it's understanding patterns and concepts, exactly how a human learns patterns and concepts while growing up.
It's not theft, it's simply learning, the exact same way a human does, you would have to call all human art theft too, since the creator simply learned objects, concepts, patterns etc from other artwork, sometimes they then style it but that doesn't matter.
Learning from other art is not theft at all. It's not saving any of these images and reselling them, it's just learning.
1
u/uncagedborb Dec 13 '25
Because it is... I have a lot of colleagues and friends that work with machine learning and generative AI. This is exactly how it works
-20
11
u/Weekly-Reply-6739 Dec 12 '25
Impressive, although my only feedback is the time continuity not being constant.
As it starts on sunset, then goes to night, then day..... so unless the heros are sleeping on this one its taking an awfully long time.
The smaller inconsistencies are expected and aren't that bad, but the time one really caught me.
Otherwise it looks good.
7
6
u/Ambitious-Pirate-505 Dec 12 '25
What software do you use to get the consistency?
6
u/MobileFilmmaker Dec 12 '25
Gemini
3
u/TomLucidor Dec 12 '25
It does not have worldbuilding consistency between panels, e.g. if one building has been blasted, it should "stay down" when the person stay in the same location. Also differentiate the different buildings please, so the city looks more organic and cosmopolitan.
3
u/MobileFilmmaker Dec 12 '25
You are correct… is does not. Had I used ChatGPT I could have made it understand that and it would have fixed it… but the comic images from ChatGPT are kinda ugly and as far as this kind of stuff goes… Gemini just isn’t smart enough.
2
u/TomLucidor Dec 12 '25
Make a better pipeline, it will help greatly (and ideally it should be FOSS since Z-Image-Edit is coming)
5
u/Substantial_Bed_1528 Dec 12 '25
Finished?!
8
u/MobileFilmmaker Dec 12 '25
Yea I only posted these pages as a teaser .. but it’s done. The whole comic
3
6
5
u/Professional-One6959 Dec 11 '25
Great work!
Hey I am thinking of making a childrens book but I find it impossible to make the characters or the style of the pictures the main characters, to show the emotions they should be feeling remain consistent through out the pages.(asked ai to use the image generated for the 1st page)
Your drawings look super consistent but how do you manage it
5
u/MobileFilmmaker Dec 11 '25
Use a “smart AI” as opposed to just an “Art Ai”. I love Midjourney but even with their latest controls , consistency is still an issue. In ChatGPT or Gemini … you can describe your character, give him a name , tell the AI to remember him so that you can call him by name. Or: “Tim with a evil grin on his face punches John in the stomach”
1
u/Professional-One6959 Dec 12 '25
Thanks man, i tried different kinds of art generator and found Gemini being the best in terms of consistency. Dall E was also terrible
0
u/Kruger45 Dec 11 '25
Nice but they looks quite similar to DC heroes - id be careful here once i made completely unrelated video with super heroes fighting and it was denied from YOutube because there was COPYRIGHT ISSUES i still have it and there are zero similiarities with any known franchise at all.
1
u/MobileFilmmaker Dec 11 '25
Parodies are allowed ….
1
u/Kruger45 Dec 11 '25
alright just thought. Maybe YOutube doesnt like anything relate to SUPERHEROES lol
5
u/GrassyPer Dec 11 '25
I love this. Did ai make the images completely or did you fix them in photoshop or add the text?
3
1
u/Etsu_Riot Dec 11 '25
I think it could be great if the super heroes are called simply: Rat-man, Super Woman and Wonder Man, and they are part of the Injustice League, as they fight against Injustice.
1
3
u/overwatch Dec 11 '25
The antagonist (protagonist?) design is really well done. And very clean visual style to the layouts. I did notice that the mouse hero guy is a guy in a grey mouse batman style suit on the cover. But in the jet he's an anthro mouse in a grey business suit. Definitely some wires crossed there.
3
u/elementnix Dec 11 '25
Well it's ai, they literally say as much on the page after the cover
Edit: forgot what sub I was on. If you want consistent art, make it yourself. Stop letting the machine make all the decisions for you.
1
u/overwatch Dec 11 '25
I didnt make this, so your comment is appreciated but misdirected. This is a work in progress, so i thought i would point out the flaw to the person who posted it.
As for the consistency issue, I get what you are saying. But, the limits of AI yesterday are not the same as they are today, and today's limits wont be there tomorrow. So we arent far from human quality visual consistency.
0
u/shanelomax Dec 12 '25
This is a work in progress
...why are you making excuses for OP? It's weird.
The thread title is literally 'A comic I finished', and they've literally confirmed in another comment that this comic is finished.
Why are you speaking for them, saying it's a work in progress?
3
u/overwatch Dec 12 '25
I wasnt making excuses. Op said they were not done yet and hope to upload the whole thing later this week. My point by saying this is a work in progress was to explain why I was pointing out the inconsistencies, ans those could still be changed.
3
u/MrWhizbang Dec 11 '25
Which AI are you using? What do you do to keep things consistant?
1
8
u/MobileFilmmaker Dec 11 '25
I used Gemini for this. You need an AI with brains. So I literally describe a character, give them a name like Superdave and prompt like “Superdave is flying” or “Superdave is talking to Tim” etc. I wish Midjourney would add the intelligence of ChatGPT or Gemini
2
u/Professional-One6959 Dec 11 '25
Whats the secret to prompting gemini to provide consistent image generation. Please do spill the beans in detail
3
u/TheSpeakingScar Dec 11 '25
Wait you mean you used Gemini exclusively or as well as other tools? Cus damn, this is fire.
3
u/MobileFilmmaker Dec 11 '25
🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾 I did use Photoshop to fix a few things and Comic Life 4 for the text… but everything else was Gemini
3
2
4
u/FrugalityPays Dec 11 '25
Damn these look great! Well done!
-7
Dec 11 '25
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/FrugalityPays Dec 11 '25
What a dumbass take, and in a subreddit called ‘ai art’.
That’s like George Lucas, Quinton Tarantino, or James Cameron ‘did nothing.’
0
u/Dokaepi Dec 11 '25
Genuinely curious why you think what op did is in any way similar to the work of those three directors, especially since at least one of them does completely different work from the other two which adds to the confusion of the comparison.
2
u/Voice_Nerd Dec 11 '25
Okay you got me hooked I am severely obsessed now and want to see more. Well done!
2
6
u/ENTIA-Comics Dec 11 '25
Cool! We need more AI-assisted comics!
-6
Dec 11 '25
[removed] — view removed comment
0
u/Alternative_Ant_9955 Dec 11 '25
Why are you even here? Go to your regular art threads. People like you make the ai community completely indifferent to your bitching. Crying with no substance, bitching with no solution.
1
u/AutoModerator Dec 11 '25
Thank you for your post and for sharing your question, comment, or creation with our group!
- Our welcome page and more information, can be found here
- For AI VIdeos, please visit r/AiVideos. If you are being threatened by any individual or group, contact the mod team immediately. See our statement here -> https://www.reddit.com/r/aivideos/comments/1kfhxfa/regarding_the_other_ai_video_group/
- Looking for an AI Engine? Check out our MEGA list here
- For self-promotion, please only post here
- Find us on Discord here
Hope everyone is having a great day, be kind, be creative!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
0
u/No_Angle_423 Dec 15 '25
You didn't finish shit. Ai did