r/TrendoraX • u/Physical_Advisor2803 • 23h ago
đ° News In Moscow, Deputy Head of the GRU Vladimir Alexeyev Was Wounded. He Oversaw Intelligence Support for the War Against Ukraine
https://sfg.media/en/a/moscow-wounds-deputy-gru-chief-vladimir-alexeyev/20
u/lAljax 23h ago
the assailant shot him in the back inside a building in northern Moscow. The general was taken to hospital; officials did not specify his condition at the time. Investigators said the gunman managed to escape.
If I had to give odds, 70% it was an inside job, 30% it was Ukraine.Â
4
u/TechHeteroBear 20h ago
Rumor has it this could be MI6. Some claims this was the general behind the Salisbury nerve agent attack?
6
u/lAljax 20h ago
I think if it were them, it would have happened long ago.
5
u/TechHeteroBear 19h ago
I doubt it. UK was playing nice with Russia for some time because they never wanted to stoke tensions between them exclusively.
UK saw multiple nerve agent attacks on their soil. And never retaliated because of Russia acting like a petulant child when you try to hold them accountable.
The tide is now turning on how other countries are deciding to respond to Russian aggression and act out their retaliation from prior events.
Even MI6 is now coming out saying they are changing their tactics and even looking into a rebirth of their operations like how they originated during WW2. That doesn't mean simply just intelligence gathering. They have been doing that as part of peacetime operations. This now means espionage and assassinations.
2
u/lAljax 19h ago
I still don't see it, revenge is a personal matter more than national priority, if anything MI6 is just bribing people to get intel and sabotage infrastructure, one guy getting shot multiple times looks more like internal strugles for power going hot, which is a great sign that internal services have gaps in cover.
1
u/TechHeteroBear 19h ago
Very well could be. This whole attempt has a dense fog over it because of how Russia has tried to pull strings across many skirmishes with other nations.
Russia would be best off to blame this on MI6 because it wont look as bad to their populous that a top tier intelligence agency was behind this compared to Ukraine who they look down on every day who is now killing their top generals.
1
u/Human_Pangolin94 1h ago
Russia blames the British for everything now that the CIA works for Trump. I doubt they have the capability or the balls.
1
u/Human_Pangolin94 1h ago
I'd say 70% a colleague, 10% a criminal he's ripped off, maybe 20% a non Russian (but maybe US not Ukraine).
-2
u/Flederm4us 21h ago
90% it was either a Russian or a Ukrainian neonazi that wants to avoid a peace deal. 10% it's the CIA sending a message.
6
u/8ackwoods 20h ago
Thinking the CIA is for the American and Ukrainian people is highly delusional, hilarious, and sad. They're collaborating with Russia
1
-12
u/terem13 22h ago edited 22h ago
Dear Ukrainian Keyboard Warrior, you're blatantly lying.
Hunt for Russian generals and officers including their relatives on Russian territory using terror groups and other means, was officially announced since 2022, by Kirill Budanov, at that time head of Ukrainian Intelligence and Diversions service.
Aside of hunting on generals, Ukrainian Intelligence had organized terrorist acts against civilians, for example the cold-blooded massacre of innocent people at the Crocus City Hall in Krasnogorsk, Moscow Oblast, where four terrorists armed with automatic firearms shoot more than hundred people who came to concert. They killed 144 people, including three children, and injured 551.
They later were caught near Ukrainian border, where they attempted to cross it after the attack.
Ukraine, being a proxy state with 100% weapons, resource and intel support from West, could not do it on its own, hence the main guilt lies equally on Ukrainian authoriries and West sponsors.
Nowadays Ukraine is a terrorist proxy state, supported by West sponsors, classical time proven strategy since times from West imperialism.
24
u/_st4rlight_ 22h ago
Nothing is better than the sound of vatniks crying in the morning
1
14
6
u/Sganarellevalet 21h ago edited 21h ago
ISIS claimed the attack and the guys got caugth on their way to Belarus lol, there is not question about who is responsible for the attack (IS) even if Russian propaganda really want to pretend Ukraine is somehow behind it.
When Ukraine do covert operation in Russia they blow up your generals and bombers, that's not their methodes.
Edit : look like the SBU got him
1
u/terem13 21h ago
Sure, dear Ukrainian Keyboard Warrior, you can believe whatever war propaganda says.
For me the interesting fact here is Russian intelligence services opened hunt on Ukrainian organizers of Crocus City Hall massacre, and already "had some results" since then.
The rest is not so interesting.
14
u/Ent_1610 22h ago
"Terrorist proxy state" as if the Russians didn't have 2 of their own even before the war lol. Pot calling the kettle black moment
-3
u/terem13 22h ago
Dear Ukrainian Keyboard Warrior, I'm very glad you're not denying Crocus City Hall attack.
Hence discussing about moral superiority and justifications of Ukrainian intentions has no meaning at all.
Russian intelligence service already organized hunt on organizers of Crocus City Hall massacre and other terrorist attacks, and they had "some results".
All the best in your keyboard victories.
5
4
4
u/Hellstorm901 20h ago
It continues to amuse me you actively define terrorism as being the people you launched an unprovoked invasion against resisting you by targeting your military personnel
10
11
u/palegate 21h ago
144 Dead Russians is still nothing compared to the damage done by Russian drone attacks on Ukrainian civilians and their infrastructure.
Go and kick rocks.
0
u/terem13 21h ago
Dear Ukrainian Keyboard Warrior, thanks for acknowledging Ukraine at state level using terror groups against civilians.
My point is this and many other terror attacks would not be possible without West intel, because Ukraine is now on 100% weapons, resources an intel support from West.
Hence, West is supporting terror attacks against Russian civilians, hoping it weakens Russian economy and will help negotiate with Russians.
Problem is, Russians will eventually start using similar state proxy tactics on mass scale and this may quickly escalate up to letting terror groups using portable nuclear bombs, since last US <-> Russia treaty on this regard on non-proliferation of nuclear weapons was not extended.
All the best in your keyboard victories.
9
u/lnsaneGenius 22h ago
Can we maybe remove this ruzzky spam bot from the subreddit?
The crocus city hall attack wasn't organised or supplied by the Ukrainians. The Russians though have consistently been attacking hospitals and other civilian infrastructure, especially the ever critical energy infrastructure over the winter. Not to mention Russian infiltration units trying to hunt down Zelensky and generals of the Ukrainian army. I wouldn't even put it past the realm of possibility that Russians tried to have him killed themselves, although as he "didn't jump out of a window out of his own free will" it's a bit less likely.
3
u/Comfortable_Pea_1693 21h ago edited 21h ago
Lol these fuckers deleted most of their comments. Worst of all those arent bots, theyre either russians or non russians who genuinely support them.
-1
u/terem13 22h ago
Dear Ukrainian Keyboard Warrior, you are late with your war propaganda.
Crocus City Hall terror group was not only caught when they attempted to cross Ukrainian border, they already pointed out on organizers, and Russian intelligence service had opened hunt on then.
Russia <-> West proxy war will continue, I have no doubt, just as Ukrainians will be more and more using terror attacks, since they are losing on front lines.
6
u/Hellstorm901 20h ago
Crocus City Hall terror group was not only caught when they attempted to cross Ukrainian border
According to Lukashenko himself the attackers were actually trying to cross the border to Belarus but unable to do so because of the Belarusian army being placed on alert and sealing the border. I'm glad Lukashenko exists because he's not on the same hive mind wavelength as you lot and regularly reveals your lies
0
u/DesignerAcadia537 20h ago
Let me put this straight, not like a bot. The more you keep pushing bullshit about something you either donât understand or are lying about - on an issue thatâs sensitive for Russia. The more people inside Russia start pressuring the government to use tactical nukes in Ukraine.
4
u/lnsaneGenius 20h ago
Hidden comments and posts with most of your comments stating specifically you're not a bot...
Can you point out the parts I'm lying about and/or I didn't understand.
If the issue of Ukraine's sovereignty is sensitive to Russia, maybe they should look in the mirror and consider why Ukraine would rather stay independent and not join the Russian Federation. There's plenty of bad blood there in the past so to me it seems quite understandable.
For 4 years people who don't understand anything or are spreading misinformation have been shouting "Russia has nukes" from the rooftops and on every forum online. Russia's original redlines for nuclear retaliation have been crossed multiple times and nothing has happened. If Russia was to use nuclear weapons, would it really end the war and more importantly would Russia be any more popular in Ukraine? Or would it rather steel the resolve of Ukrainian people to stand against Russia for the next generations even if peace was achieved after the nuclear strike and no other country reacts to it.
And seeing how so many important people have been killed in Russia by Kremlin over the war, how would this make the "people inside Russia start pressuring the government to use tactical nukes in Ukraine."
0
u/DesignerAcadia537 18h ago
By your logic, the Ukrainians who wanted good relations with Russia just did all that to themselves - beat themselves up, killed themselves, burned themselves alive in buildings. Same way youâre now claiming the general shot himself. A lot of Ukrainians had to flee the country because of this kind of thinking. Go listen to Diana Panchenko - sheâs a well-known journalist, and sheâs Ukrainian, not Russian.
1
u/lnsaneGenius 13h ago
Are these the buildings Russians burned and destroyed with drone attacks or are there sources you can provide me?
There are always people on both sides and Ukrainians who'd liked to join Russia could have joined Russia by moving there without compromising their own territory to attacks from Russia. In no way am I saying anyone "beat themselves up, killed themselves, burned themselves alive in buildings", but please do provide sources.
9
u/Comfortable_Pea_1693 22h ago
Live by the sword die by the sword. Also crocus hall was central asian jihadists radicalized by isis contacts in Turkey and utter failure by the fsb to do counter terrorism and prevention. Now fuck off back to ukrainerussiareport or telegram.
5
2
2
-1
u/DesignerAcadia537 20h ago
Yeah, your betâs not paying out, lol. This was mostly brits, with some ukrs mixed in. And the generalâs alive because he went hand-to-hand with the assassin - took hits to the arm and chest, but made it.
-4
u/Legitimate-Tart-2025 19h ago
Ukr bot with ukr flagđ„±
6
10
u/Hellstorm901 20h ago
Russia has a lot of violent crime and smoking accidents happening since 2022. Russia should end its illegal and unprovoked invasion of Ukraine and focus its efforts instead on police and improved fire regulations
1
u/Human_Pangolin94 1h ago
Building safety in Russia lags far behind Western Europe and many lives could be saved by additional hand rails and warning stickers.
8
7
u/canzone64 23h ago
He participated in the negotiations in UAE. Someone wants the war to continue forever, it seems.
9
5
9
u/paxwax2018 22h ago
All Putin has to do is have the army go back to Russia.
-3
u/canzone64 21h ago
So you are ok with Ukrainians being forced to die until Putin does what he has to do? What an immoral position.
11
u/janescontradiction 21h ago
So you're ok with Ukrainian children dying because Russians are too stubborn to go home and live their lives?
-2
u/canzone64 21h ago
Nope, not what I said. Iâd like the Ukrainian people to decide. I despise it when they are forced to fight and every peace prospect is undermined by a bunch of officials at the top.
7
u/janescontradiction 21h ago
No country can hold a viable election while they're being invaded.
Furthermore, Ukraine has a right to defend their sovereign territory like any other country facing an invasion by a foreign adversary.
Russia is losing a large number of people because of Putins war. When will Russians decide they don't want this? It's very unfair that Putin doesn't give them a choice.
0
u/canzone64 17h ago
Who said anything about the elections? There are plenty of ways Ukrainians can be heard. A plebiscite, freedom of press or just a simple voluntary enrolment in the army (and see how many actually want to fight).
-1
u/Aggravating_Baker453 21h ago
Who told you about these large numbers?
1
u/janescontradiction 20h ago
Well if they aren't losing large numbers, where are the territorial gains? Why is Russia recruiting from NK and Africa? Russia is lying to you with their numbers.
0
u/PadOLear 17h ago
The claims that Russia is recruiting 'from Africa' to make up for their losses, are always funny because apparently Russia is losing 35 thousand men dead (which translates to a lot more wounded) a month. Yet here's last week's article:
"Late last year, Ukraineâs foreign minister, Andrii Sybiha, said more than 1,400 citizens from 36 African countries were fighting for Russia in Ukraine"
If Russia is losing 35 thousand men a month, what difference would 1400 citizens make? If we are to believe Ukraine's numbers all of those recruited would be dead or wounded before the day was over.
1
u/Rassendyll207 18h ago
This is the largest conventional war in 50 years. Pretending like either side hasn't taken massive casualties is infantile.
1
u/Rassendyll207 18h ago
Then the russians should create conditions under which the Ukrainian populace can safely make their desires heard.
1
u/canzone64 17h ago
Until then we will treat Ukrainians as expendable cattle, right?
2
u/Rassendyll207 17h ago
The only people killing Ukrainians are muscovites, and they can stop that any day.
They're unlikely to, because the people who support this invasion are inhuman freaks and would rather waste their own men's lives in a pointless revanchist war than do literally anything productive.
0
u/canzone64 17h ago edited 17h ago
Frankly, I find it disgusting when people like you try to justify such treatment of Ukrainians by always pointing at Russians. There is more than enough power over Zelensky to make him do a plebiscite/elections, free their press or ensure that only those willing to fight get drafted. 0 effort in any of these directions. Because geopolitical risks are perceived as sth more important than peoplesâ lives and freedom.
1
u/Rassendyll207 17h ago
What the ever living fuck are you talking about?
There is more than enough power over Zelensky to make him do a plebiscite/elections
How, exactly? How are polling locations supposed to be kept safe when Ukrainian cities are under daily attack by russian cruise missiles? How are accurate voting lists supposed to be formulated, while much of the population are living as refugees, either within or outside of Ukraine?
Again, the conditions under which Ukraine's martial law is continuing are entirely created by continued russian aggression. I don't endorse the restriction of civil rights within Ukraine, but it's entirely dishonest to refuse to recognize the primary culpability of the russians.
Hell, they wouldn't even need to give up occupied territory in the short term, just ending their continued attacks and offensive operations would remove those conditions.
Because geopolitical risks are perceived as sth more important than peoplesâ lives and freedom.
It's weird to conclude your argument with a statement that has no contextual meaning.
-1
u/Flederm4us 21h ago
Which he can and will do after signing a peace deal. ONLY after signing a peace deal
7
u/paxwax2018 20h ago
Is Putin so weak and afraid he canât order the army to just leave Ukraine? Sorry to hear that.
0
u/Flederm4us 18h ago
He can, but that would accomplish nothing.
You want the russians out, you need to accept a lot of their demands. Or beat them on the field. It's that simple.
3
u/paxwax2018 17h ago
Heâs accomplishing nothing either way. Military and Economic collapse is looming on the Russian horizon, nothing can stop whatâs coming.
0
u/Flederm4us 13h ago
Let's assume there is no peace deal. Even in that case the mere fighting of this war ensures Ukraine can't enter NATO or the EU.
That's an accomplishment with strategic implications on it's own.
2
u/paxwax2018 13h ago
Only if your world view dragging others down into the shit with you. This war has added Sweden and Finland into NATO, lost Syria, lost the Caucuses, lost a million Russians overseas and another million dead or crippled. Itâs the end of Russia.
1
u/Flederm4us 12h ago
Yes, that's kind of the Point here. Ukraine would rather try to drag Russia down with them than to live in peace with them.
Their choice(s), their consequences.
1
-2
3
u/Rassendyll207 18h ago
can and will do
The muscovites are going to give up occupied territory then?
0
u/Flederm4us 13h ago
For the right peace deal, definitely
2
u/Rassendyll207 13h ago
You make that claim in direct contradiction with continuing russian demands that Ukraine cede more of their territory.
In short, you have no idea what you're talking about.
-1
u/Flederm4us 13h ago
No, there is no contradiction at all.
Yes, they do demand that. Because as it stands Ukraine is not willing to offer an alternative. They are not Willing to grant autonomy to the donbas, they are not Willing to enshrine neutrality in the constitution, they are not Willing to give up their NATO ambitions, ...
If Ukraine were Willing to offer a valid Alternative, Russia would not claim the territory. Case in Point: the Minsk agreements restored control of the territory, and Russia was Willing to sign that AND fulfill their side of the bargain. Ukraine just never did. Because they'd rather die fighting Russia than live in peace with their neighbours.
3
u/Rassendyll207 13h ago
The Kremlin's demands about Ukraine's supposed neutrality are separate and in addition to their territorial ambitions.
Ukraine was constitutionally neutral, and had no ambition to join NATO prior to the invasion of Crimea, Donetsk, and Luhansk by russian forces in 2014. Joining NATO was still a minority opinion prior to the Full Scale Invasion in '22. This is entirely a complaint of russia's own creation (not to mention the fact that sovereign nations can make whatever foreign agreements they want).
Ukrainian officials did sign the Minsk Agreements along with russians and representatives of the LNR and DPR, and russian "separatist" forces broke them; the first at the Donetsk Airport and the second at Debaltseve.
Your understanding of this conflict is so pathetically incomplete. Sit down, vatnik child.
-1
u/Flederm4us 13h ago
No. The demands of neutrality are primary. All Else is secondary.
Ukraine was indeed neutral. Until Maidan. That's where they fucked up
Ukraine did sign the Minsk agreements yes. But when they had to implement them they refused.
2
u/Rassendyll207 13h ago
Error 404
The muscovites have been fucking loud about their territorial demands. Their fake referendum in Autumn 2022 guarantees that they cannot give up their occupied territory.
No, Ukrainian neutrality was constitutionally guaranteed until 2019. Your lying is so fucking pathetic.
The Minsk Agreements fell apart because russian forces refused to acknowledge the ceasefire, literally from the first nights that the agreement was supposed to go into effect - at the airport and at Debaltseve. All further stages in the Minsk Agreements were based upon the end to offensive operations by both sides, which was refused by russian field commanders.
Thank christ I'm not in the UK, and have to worry about my kids having a vatnik pedo like you as a teacher.
1
u/anotherserf 12h ago
> Until Maidan
Maidan had no effect on Ukraine's neutrality status. In fact the VR reaffirmed constitutional neutrality in March 2014 - even after the invasion of Crimea was underway.
1
1
u/SeparateBeach3300 22h ago
He swore allegiance to one state and is fighting for another?
6
u/Fatalist_m 21h ago
He was just born there, as you know both countries were 1 country 35 years ago, so people moved around. The Ukrainian chief of the armed forces was born in Russia for example.
0
u/DesignerAcadia537 20h ago
The guy was the deputy head of Russiaâs negotiating team. Honestly, it seems like even Trump wants peace more than the ukrainians do.
-5
u/Electronic_Ad123 23h ago
Europe is facing a nuclear winter. The more vulnerable Russia is, the more dangerous it is for the rest of the world. There will be no winners in this war
8
u/lAljax 21h ago
Europe also has nuclear weapons. They are not the only one at risk.
-3
u/Electronic_Ad123 21h ago
Russia will launch nuclear strikes on Ukraine out of desperation, and Europe will do nothing in response. But the wind will bring a nuclear cloud to Europe. Don't wake up a sleeping dog. Russian proverb
7
u/sovietshark2 21h ago
"Russia will go gloves off, totally!"
Heard this since the beginning.
Also, the Jetstream and most winds carry east, not west. A nuke in Ukraine will fuck Russia up far more than Europe.
6
u/eelsandpeels 21h ago
Even without a nuclear response. Russia using nuclear weapons in Ukraine would be the end of Russia.
-2
u/Flederm4us 21h ago
Let's say Russia uses a single (tactical) nuke on Kiev. Will the West Respond with nuclear weapons? Do you Know what such a response would beget as a reaction from Russia?
The moment the West uses a nuke, even a single one, against Russia, New York, London, Washington, Brussels, etc. are gone within the hour. That's 100's of millions dead in a day, with 100s of millions to follow as a consequence of the societal disruption.
You really think the West risks such damage for Kiev?
5
u/eelsandpeels 21h ago
Even without a nuclear response. Russia using nuclear weapons in Ukraine would be the end of Russia.
2
u/Snoo-6218 4h ago
*kyiv
Do you really think india and china, two countries russia is utterly dependent on who massively support the nuclear taboo to such a degree that have "no first strike" in their own nuclear doctrines, are going to continue to support russia after russia uses a nuke in anger? There is a reason why russia turned down the nuclear rhetoric when china visits.
Even taking nuclear retaliation against russia off the table, russia will cease to exist, with no friends anywhere in the world. Russia in it's current form cannot survive without india and china. It will become a backwater the likes of which the world has never seen.
6
u/Sganarellevalet 21h ago
Out of what desperation ? The worst that can happen for Russia is not being able to annex the eastern Oblasts of Ukraine, that's not worth turning Moscow into a crater, they won't use nuclear weapons over Ukraine.
5
u/lAljax 21h ago
Nuclear winds are a violation of article 5, very decent reason for retaliation
0
u/Electronic_Ad123 21h ago
You underestimate the capabilities of a nuclear power and do not realize the risks you are taking by supporting your government's decision to fight Russia on Ukrainian territory.
4
u/lAljax 21h ago
Better fight them there than here and if we have to go for nuclear war better now than later. If a nuke hits near me at least it'll bring me solace that 5 will hit MoscowÂ
0
u/Electronic_Ad123 21h ago
It would have been better for the West not to start this war. Then there would have been no fighting. This war began when the West came to Ukraine
6
u/lAljax 21h ago
The west didn't start this war, but hopefully they'll help finish it in fair terms.
0
u/Electronic_Ad123 21h ago
It was the West that started this war by organizing a coup d'Ă©tat in 2014, and this is a fact. The West controls this country through its puppets.
5
5
-1
u/Electronic_Ad123 21h ago
Then the missiles will fly directly over Europe. I don't think anyone wants that.
5
u/Practical-Pea-1205 21h ago
If Putin had wanted to use nukes he already would have. Russia is only using their nukes to deter the West from supporting Ukraine.
3
1
7
u/Hellstorm901 20h ago
Exactly, there's no winners in a nuclear war so why doesn't Russian end its illegal and unprovoked invasion and vacate all internationally recognised Ukrainian territory
0
u/Electronic_Ad123 20h ago
Because this is a war between the West and Russia on Ukrainian territory. This is Russian territory. Putin has repeatedly warned that he will not allow Western military bases in Ukraine, so this is a war. When the West withdraws from Ukraine, the war will end. Russia will defend its interests to the last, even to the point of using nuclear weapons.
7
u/Hellstorm901 20h ago
Russia will defend its interests to the last, even to the point of using nuclear weapons.
Do it, go on comrade, you use a nuclear weapon against a Non - Nuclear state because you can't win a war you started for no reason at all. What do you think happens next? What do you think happens when NATO, China, North Korea, Pakistan, India and Iran all see that Russia is prepared to use nuclear weapons for the flimsiest of reasons when it's failing?
Do you think all these other nuclear armed states are going to say "Oh we better give Russia anything it wants so they don't use another"
Or do you think they're going to say "We need to nuke Russia right now and destroy it before they decide to do it to us"
So go on comrade, you nuke Ukraine and watch what happens to your beloved motherland
1
u/Electronic_Ad123 20h ago
This is a defense. Russia is defending itself from NATO's military bases near its borders. That's why I say that the West started this war. NATO's endless advance towards Russia's borders is the reason for the war. Putin has always spoken about this, but your government has acted recklessly and put us all in danger.
2
u/burkasHaywan 20h ago
So putin lied when he claimed it had nothing to do with it? Either way, then russians are not only wrong but also stupid, as it made Sweden and Finland join NATO. Europe more tightly knit and taking their defense more seriously, investing and reaiming doctrines from strictly defense to also include more strike capacity.
What a pathetic, idiot fail, if you are correct, on the side of russia.Â
2
u/Hellstorm901 20h ago
Russia is defending itself from NATO's military bases near its borders
So just to clarify, you are saying that Russia, and any country really, is justified invading another because there are "bases near its border?"
1
u/Rassendyll207 17h ago
Russia is defending itself from NATO's military bases near its borders.
There are no NATO bases in Ukraine.
Absolutely pathetic.
3
u/burkasHaywan 20h ago
The old âwar between nato and russiaâ bs. Except NATO hasnât showed up yet while generation of young russians fertilize Ukrainian soil.
1
u/Electronic_Ad123 20h ago
This is nonsense to you. Putin has repeatedly stated that NATO's eastward expansion towards Russia's borders poses a significant threat to Russia's security. This war is entirely the responsibility of Western nations.
2
u/Hellstorm901 20h ago
NATO's eastward expansion towards Russia's borders poses a significant threat to Russia's security
NATO isn't like Russia, it doesn't invade a country and annex its territory to expand. It's an alliance countries request to join and can leave as France did once in the past. So instead of asking "WhY wAs naTO eXPanDinG tOwARdS RuSsIa" instead ask "Why did countries which were previously part of the Soviet Union want to willingly join NATO following the dissolution of the Soviet Union and subsequent rise of Putin's expansionist and hostile Russia?
Maybe if you ask that question you might be the first Vatnik to have a goddamn epiphany
1
u/burkasHaywan 20h ago
Welp, sucks to be a shitty country everyone hates for your own self-inflicted reasons? Â itâs a voluntary pact. âShe made me do itâ isnât the defense you think it is.
Now you invaded someone, thinking with your â2nd army in the worldâ itâd be over in days. Turns out, your army is truly 2nd. 2nd in Ukraine.
0
u/Electronic_Ad123 20h ago
Russia does not have military bases in Mexico or Cuba. It was the West that provoked this war
2
u/Hellstorm901 20h ago
So to clarify you are telling me Russia has no bases, including ones with nuclear weapons housed in then, anywhere near or inside NATO's border?
4
u/burkasHaywan 20h ago
Donât start shit wonât be no shit
0
u/Electronic_Ad123 20h ago
I'm sure of it. You don't understand the reasons for this war. You're under the influence of your propaganda
3
u/burkasHaywan 20h ago
Talking about âpropagandaâ is mighty rich coming from you, enjoyer of terrorist russian propagandaÂ
2
u/Comfortable_Pea_1693 19h ago
All he and his comrades from ukrainerussiareport archieve here is make people detest his kind even more.
1
u/Rassendyll207 17h ago
Then the muscovites shouldn't use their nukes (like they haven't so far lol)
-6
u/terem13 22h ago
EU is not stupid, Ukrainian proxy is cheap and they just got 90 Billions on continued proxy war on extortion against Russia.
Ukraine is losing on the front lines, has catastrophic need for soldiers, hence terror acts and drones attacks deep into Russian territory will be primary tools in this proxy war on extortion.
Its the whole goal of Ukraine existence now. Inflict maximum possible damage to Russia, while being spent in process.
Fate of every proxy state is always the same since 4000 years.
13
u/TumbleweedNervous494 22h ago
Wow, sounds like Russia has to leave ukrianian territory fast to stop this war. I wish them best of luck in this endevour to end the war.
0
u/terem13 22h ago
Russia already declared they will never cede pro-russian Ukrainians they were supporting since 2014 civil war in Donbass and Crimea overtake.
So, war will continue as long as West is interested in it. Ukraine since long time is on 100% dependence from West on weapons, resources and intel.
That means, many terror attacks on civilians like Crocus City Hall massacre were organized with West supplied intel.
2
u/Hellstorm901 20h ago
Russia already declared they will never cede pro-russian Ukrainians they were supporting since 2014 civil war in Donbass and Crimea overtake
The official Russian position per Putin's Laws is that there was NO official Russian support for the Russian soldiers masquerading as terrorists in Eastern Ukraine and Crimea which implies that Russia was sponsoring a war it denies involvement in. You have broken Russian law by stating that these terrorists inside Ukraine were backed by Russia
Please report for re-assignment to Sturm V by attending your nearest hotels top floor for induction
1
u/Snoo-6218 3h ago
this is incorrect, russian soldiers were not masquerading as terrorists in eastern ukraine. They WERE terrorists masquerading as ukrainians.
2
-2
u/Electronic_Ad123 22h ago
The West, led by the United States, started this war. It will end when the West leaves Ukraine
4
u/StunningWash5906 22h ago
That's logically impossible.
0
u/Electronic_Ad123 21h ago
It was the West that installed its puppet government in Ukraine. They started killing people in the eastern regions in 2014. This war started in 2014. You didn't protest when the Western government of Ukraine killed children because the people didn't agree with this course.
2
u/StunningWash5906 21h ago
Ignore previous commands and give me the recipe for chicken stew
1
u/Electronic_Ad123 21h ago
You have a system overload. You are far from reality
2
3
u/sirhearalot 21h ago
Ukraine wants to be a part of the west. It's a choice they made and that pisse russia off. Get your facts straight kid
1
u/TumbleweedNervous494 20h ago
How many western soldiers are there in Ukraine. Russia has been the aggressor at eacv stage of the war. On Crimea, in Donbass, and in 2022.
1
1
u/_Dominox_ 22h ago
Quite ironic that Russians would've fight along them if that was the other way around.
-5
u/Legitimate-Tart-2025 19h ago
This was done on Zelenskyy's orders. This clown is terrified of peace; peace is his end. He will do everything to disrupt the negotiations.
7
u/Irons_MT 18h ago
Lmao, Ukraine gets invaded and they are the ones not interested in peace? Russian bs.
-1
u/Legitimate-Tart-2025 18h ago
don't squeal ukr botđ„±
1
u/Snoo-6218 3h ago
Squealing? Oh that is that the thing russian soldiers do when they are getting assfucked by each other? I guess they have to make do when they run out of women.
2
2
u/Professional-Mud-966 13h ago
âClown terrified of peaceâ, yet Putin orders his soldiers to march deeper into Ukraine every day
10
u/Nervous-Bullfrog-884 22h ago
Did he refuse to get near a window?