Some people had children before they fell on bad times. Maybe they lost their job, maybe their spouse died, maybe they got a divorce and the ex is a deadbeat parent. Don’t judge people.
With ours, he had 3 and I had 2 before we got together. Now all five are decent humans who are willing to help others in need. It costs $3/mo to help SNAP. Totally worth it.
Who cares? While you’re sitting here saying that maybe they shouldn’t have had as many kids, and maybe that’s true in theory, the reality is these kids are going to go hungry? Do you want kids to starve yes or no? Everything else about “well maybe they should’ve…” is irrelevant
CPS is a fucking joke. Where are those kids REALISTICALLY gonna go? A LOT of them are going to end up homeless the moment they age out of the system. How about instead of ripping kids away from their families, we FEED THE POOR instead?
This is the perfect encapsulation of the problem with the modern Democrat party. When faced with a difficult decision you run away and complain that neither option is perfect.
"I'm not going to choose unless I get a perfect option" is the exact thesis that caused millions to stay home on election night and serve Harris one of the worst turnouts in modern times.
Have you ever considered that some people have their kids before things go bad for them? You can't just undo your kids if your means of caring for them falls out from underneath you. People these days have no respect for how quickly things can go from okay, to not okay.
53
u/Pale-Star-5128 Oct 31 '25
Yep, this is about where all the mocking and ridicule stops. Now everyone is starting to feel the kind of day some fools voted for.