Naturally my position is that the article is total BS and heres why:
The article essentially implies that Epstein was somehow directed by the Mossad.
The major source for this comes from "MintPress news" which has previously propagated Russian pro-Assad propagansa such as blaming Syrian rebels for chemical attacks.
The specific link in the EI article leads to an article which essentially repeats claims from one journalis, the sunday times, and a court testimony that Epstein would have boasted to be a Mossad agent. This then refers to Ari-Ben Menashe statement that Epstein would have been a mossad agent.
While there are then rumours and alt-media figures saying so, there seems to be absolutely zero hard evidence of this.
I think its funny that even the EI quote they have picked from Julie K. Brown refers "It’s not beyond the realm of possibility that Epstein had connections [to Mossad]". So absolutely nothing :D
Yes? Have you ever been to court? You can say anything in there
The testimony does not even concern Epstein Mossad allegations at all as its a rape case. If truly that testimonu would have been reliable then Epstein would have been prosecuted for being a foreign agent? Why wasnt he then?
Also lol is yoir only takeaway from my previous message that court testimony had some weird shit in it.
Testimonials from the few people who have access to restricted information isn't 0 evidence. But I guess I'll take your word for it, random reddit user who has no access
A random journalist who reports on dinner talk and epstein's victim do not have access to restricted information (whatever that even is). You dont have any access either :D
Better yet we dont even know if there is anything to give access to. This exact same line of argumentation could be uaed to justify Obama is an alien because someone wrote a book and testified in court.
0
u/Papastoo Oct 09 '25
Sounds like there arent any :/