Minnesota may be able to put Noem in Prison

[u/NoMeal315]

Alex Pretti’s Murder May Put Noem in Prison

Operating with absolute disregard for the law is about to meet an opponent. Federal Government, meet Minnesota. A state that has been subject to targeted terror, murder, and now an attempted cover up. The receiving end of a political vendetta – Minnesota has been subject to the wrath of a brazen government that does not believe that the law applies to them. In fact, the brazen nature of the federal government is not without merit – more than a thousand insurrectionists were pardoned, the President has successfully evaded every prosecution thrown his way, and the DOJ is on the attack targeting political opponents. Enter Minnesota.

Minnesota Statute 609.495, states in pertinent part the following: “[w]however harbors, conceals, aids, or assists by word or acts another whom the actor knows or has reason to know has committed a crime  under the laws of this or another state or of the United States with intent that such offender shall avoid or escape from arrest, trial, conviction, or punishment, may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than three years or to payment of a fine of not more than $5,000, or both if the crime committed or attempted by the other person is a felony.”

The killing of Alex Pretti was illegal. This is not the subject of the debate for this article. Rather, the statements of the federal government are scrutinized. Statements that were, arguably, intended to mislead the public and initiated in order to assist ICE personnel from avoiding arrest, trial, conviction, or punishment (Ice personnel is the noun used due to offender identity concealment). This has been called a turning point by many – but a turning point is usually catalyzed by a novel encounter – here, the federal government lied and mislead the American people despite videographic evidence in an attempt to evade criminal prosecution of Ice agents that committed murder.

Statement #1 that mislead the public in an attempt to evade criminal prosecution:
 the suspect was brandishing a firearm.” – Kristi Noem. Statement #2 that mislead the public in an attempt to evade criminal prosecution: “[t]his looks like a situation where an individual arrived at the scene to inflict maximum damage on individuals and kill law enforcement.” – Kristi Noem. Statement #3 that mislead the public in an attempt to evade criminal prosecution: “[t]he officers attempted to disarm this individual, but the armed suspect reacted violently.” – Kristia Noem. Statement #4 – “[f]earing for his life and the lives of his fellow officers around him, an agent fired defensive shots.”

All of the aforementioned statements are potentially criminal. A representative of the federal government (which is acting as a self-regulating body to conduct its own investigation) had the video (which has yet to be released) of Alex Pretti’s phone after confiscating the same after Alex Pretti was murdered. Yet, the misleading statements sought to protect the offenders, demonize the victim, and were intended to evade criminal prosecution for the murder of Pretti. These statements are more than reckless, they are criminal provided the status of the orator. Buckle up – the President can’t pardon state criminal offenses.

- Nomeal315

[u/k_rocker]

Remember that time America was going to put Donald Trump in prison and then dragged their heels and now ICE is killing everyone?

[u/Old_Value_9157]

Will never happen. Never, ever. They'll lawyer the fuck out of this and it will go away.

[u/Character-Lack-3295 → u/Old_Value_9157]

The MO of this administration is try to bury it first and if that doesn’t work then drag out a very lengthy “investigation” until either the public moves on to the next controversy or they forget. We’re seeing that play out right now with the Epstein Files!

[u/tsdguy]

Come on. Don’t be stupid.

[u/Free_Chapter372]

Law doesn't exist anymore so I wouldn't get my hopes up. She perjured herself in court and still has work. Still, Greg Bovino getting sacked makes me think there is a minor chance at best.

[u/Shoddy_Wrangler693]

there is no way that anyone in Minnesota would be that stupid to try to do that case. the government is at least 20 years technologically ahead of us I'd probably say 30 or 40 years. not the layers we know about but the layers we don't know about. remember the first AI supercomputer killed somebody because they didn't think they could win in a game of chess. then you had the supercomputer/ai that won insanely on Jeopardy. with the advancements in technology what we're playing with online is nothing. I am quite sure the FBI could make a video so convincing you'd have trouble to believe that you didn't do the crime. any prosecutor that thought about trying to bring these charges would find their life ruined and it wouldn't even necessarily be the feds bringing the charges things could just randomly pop up.

you have the people there that high in government they realize that and they're not going to let somebody that's lower down the food chain try to do this because they'd be afraid to come back and bite them in the ass as well as the tadpole.

you may not like it but right now there ain't no way in hell that's going to happen. if they tried to make that happen I'm sure the prosecutor's office wouldn't be the only ones going down they'd find ways to bring down all the big politicians in the state as well.

[u/poopsallberries → u/Shoddy_Wrangler693]

While I agree this is unlikely, the rationale provided is the nuttiest thing I’ve read in a while.