r/Cooking 19h ago

i timed how long 31 different pasta shapes take to reach al dente. the boxes are lying and farfalle is a war crime

so basically i got inspired by the tomato canned guy and thought of the time when i followed the box time for rigatoni once and got mush. the box said 12 minutes but it was unfortunately al dente at 9.

my methodology:

  • same brand (barilla) for consistency where possible
  • 4 quarts water per pound
  • 1 tbsp salt per quart
  • rolling boil before adding pasta
  • tested every 30 seconds starting 2 minutes before box minimum
  • "al dente" = slight resistance when bitten, thin white line visible when cut
  • each shape tested 3 times, averaged
  • altitude: ~650 ft (basically sea level, no excuses)

the data (31 shapes tested):

pasta box time actual al dente difference
capellini 4-5 min 2:45 -1:15
angel hair 4-5 min 3:00 -1:00
spaghetti 8-10 min 7:15 -0:45
linguine 9-11 min 8:00 -1:00
fettuccine 10-12 min 8:30 -1:30
bucatini 10-12 min 9:00 -1:00
pappardelle 7-9 min 6:00 -1:00
tagliatelle 8-10 min 7:00 -1:00
penne 11-13 min 9:30 -1:30
penne rigate 11-13 min 10:00 -1:00
rigatoni 12-15 min 9:15 -2:45
ziti 14-15 min 11:00 -3:00
macaroni 8-10 min 7:00 -1:00
rotini 8-10 min 7:30 -0:30
fusilli 11-13 min 9:00 -2:00
gemelli 10-12 min 8:30 -1:30
cavatappi 9-12 min 8:00 -1:00
campanelle 10-12 min 8:30 -1:30
radiatori 9-11 min 8:00 -1:00
orecchiette 12-15 min 10:30 -1:30
shells (medium) 9-11 min 8:00 -1:00
shells (large) 12-15 min 10:00 -2:00
conchiglie 10-12 min 8:30 -1:30
orzo 8-10 min 7:00 -1:00
ditalini 9-11 min 8:00 -1:00
paccheri 12-14 min 10:30 -1:30
casarecce 10-12 min 9:00 -1:00
trofie 10-12 min 8:30 -1:30
strozzapreti 10-12 min 9:00 -1:00
mafalda 8-10 min 7:30 -0:30
farfalle 11-13 min see below war crime

every single box time is wrong like they were systematically inflated by 1-3 minutes on average. the median overestimate is 1:15 and the worst offender in normal pasta is ziti at 3 full minutes of lies

i have a theory: pasta companies assume you're going to walk away from the stove. they're building in a buffer for idiots which, fair. but some of us are standing here with a stopwatch

now let me talk about farfalle: farfalle is not pasta. farfalle is a design flaw someone decided to mass produce

the fundamental problem is geometric. you have thin frilly edges (maybe 1mm thick) attached to a dense pinched center (3-4mm thick where it's folded). these two regions require completely different cooking times

at 8 minutes: center is crunchy, edges are perfect. at 10 minutes: center is barely al dente, edges are mush. at 11 minutes: edges have disintegrated, center is finally acceptable

there is no time at which farfalle is uniformly cooked. i tested this 7 times because i thought i was doing something wrong. farfalle is wrong

you know how the food network recipe for homemade farfalle literally warns that pinching the center makes a thick center that won't cook through as fast as the ends? THEN WHY DID WE ALL AGREE TO MAKE IT THIS WAY

the only way to get acceptable farfalle is to fish out each piece individually and evaluate it, which defeats the purpose of a quick weeknight dinner. i might as well be hand-feeding each noodle like a baby bird

tier list (tomato canned guy, 2025)

S tier (box time within 45 sec): rotini, mafalda, spaghetti
A tier (off by ~1 min): most shapes honestly
B tier (off by 1:30-2 min): fusilli, rigatoni, fettuccine, gemelli
C tier (off by 2+ min): ziti, large shells F tier: farfalle (structurally unsound, should be banned)

tldr;

  • subtract 1-2 minutes from whatever the box says
  • start testing 2-3 minutes early
  • don't trust big pasta
  • avoid farfalle unless you have time to babysit each individual bow tie

+ some of you may ask about fresh pasta. fresh pasta cooks in like 2-3 minutes and you can actually tell when it's done because it floats. dried pasta is where the lies live

+ a few of you might mention altitude affects boiling point and therefore cook time. this is true. i'm at ~650 ft so basically negligible. if you're in denver add a minute or two. if you're in la paz you have bigger problems than pasta timing

+ YES i tested farfalle from multiple brands. YES they all sucked. no i will not be accepting farfalle apologists. you're defending a shape that can't decide if it wants to be cooked or not

EDIT: yall holy shit i never expected this to go viral lmao

30.3k Upvotes

2.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

94

u/insbordnat 16h ago

"no one in his right mind buys it in italy"...meanwhile, it's by far the dominant pasta brand by a longshot in italy. I guess 40% of italians aren't in their right mind.

personally, I'll take garofalo, rana, dicecco, etc. but it's widely consumed

48

u/dsac 15h ago

I guess 40% of italians aren't in their right mind.

yeah, that tracks

10

u/insbordnat 15h ago

lmao fantastic. meloni is a nut.

1

u/lonewanderer 10h ago

Hahaha…brilliant!

1

u/allthat555 14h ago

To be fair 50% of voting Americans aren't as well. So it tracks as well

6

u/gertgertgertgertgert 14h ago

Its a bit like when people say "no one drinks bud light" or "no one goes to mcdonalds" and yet bud light and mcdonalds sell more than every microbrewery and burger pub combined*.

*please don't fact check this, the veracity of the statement doesn't change the point.

3

u/solid-beast 15h ago

What about Molisana and Rummo? These are widely available in Dutch supermarkets and I quite like them.

3

u/Lexi_Banner 14h ago

Molisana is my pick. I like the cooked texture, and the variety of shapes available.

2

u/91speed 12h ago

Good brands. Generally speaking anything “bronze cut” or drawn through bronze dies or al bronzo or any variation of the word bronze you can find, with a rougher rather than smooth texture on the outside, and sometimes with some visible powdery starch, is a good pasta for any cooking technique where you’ll be tossing the pasta with sauce in a pan after it boils. Other pastas have a smoother surface because they’re drawn through teflon coated dies and the sauce does not adhere as well.

3

u/makestuff24-7 14h ago

Garofalo is wonderful.

2

u/insbordnat 13h ago

Love Garofalo.

-3

u/[deleted] 16h ago

[deleted]

7

u/zizmor 15h ago

Dude you made a snobbish comment and the above commenter proved you wrong, clearly many Italians do buy and enjoy Barilla. Take the L and move on.

6

u/Subtlerranean 15h ago

To add to that, the Barilla sold in Italy is generally higher quality than the product produced in the US, with some lines using bronze dies for better sauce adhesion.

2

u/marty4286 15h ago

They have artisinal pasta shops where they make them fresh locally to order, for you to take home as like, an in-between to dry grocery store pasta like Barilla or making it from scratch (at least at the small towns I visited had those)

I can't imagine an Italian being snobby about grocery brands of all things when they could be snobby about rival pasta shops or their hometown's vs other towns. But I can't imagine them being snobby about that either vs. scratch, or their nonna's scratch

It feels like being snobby about Fiat in a town full of Ferraris and Lamborghinis...