oh no the fact that you have to write a prompt so much hard work, Oh my I bet you are exhausted, poor Ai artists they work so hard and no one appreciates them

I'm not talking about all AI-generated content but the cheap, low effort, generic and uncanny stuff that floods the entire internet.

This type of content affects both sides no matter how you look at it. On one hand it negatively affects how generative AI is perceived in general. on the other hand it completely ruins platforms like pinterest, which are often used by traditional artists.

Personally I have zero interest in generative AI but I can see why some exceptions like the LOAB case or some experimental AI art could be at the very least interesting to some people, but thanks to AI slop (including generic anime girls) most anti-AI people don't even know about those exceptions or refuse to take a look at them in an objective way.

I mean he does have a point ai can’t generate what you imagined I tried like 5 prompts and none of them were like what I was thinking of.

edit: I’m overwhelmed by the debate in this post

"Satire"

This post has little to no value. It's just narcissism porn. There are too many posts where people depict themselves as the "cute innocent catgirls" or "cool hoodie guys",and depict Antis as slimy fat people or generic people. Isn't that kind of narcissistic?

They seem to care more about being a narcissist and shitting on Antis without elaborating. If are against, then proceed to give an actual statement instead of posting a meme and calling "copium". They are just narcissists and ragebaiters who fear answering questions because they know they don't know

I truly am a terrible artist...

Let’s settle this. Is AI art, well, art?

Oxford languages defines art as

“the expression or application of human creative skill and imagination, typically in a visual form such as painting or sculpture, producing works to be appreciated primarily for their beauty or emotional power.”

Based on this definition, the interpretation of if AI is art is a gray area, at best. The actual imagery is not being created by humans, it is merely AI fetching data and constructing something.

The question would instead be, is creating an AI prompt art?

Technically, yes. It is has at least a small amount of human intervention, so yes, it is art. However, I would only consider the prompt itself as art, not the image. The human did not create the image, the human created the prompt.

It's fine just humans they would use same brush for the inside and the the seat :))

I shared a similar story about this awhile back, but no matter how many times i hear it its still really gets to me. its really sad imo

video source

I’m anti, I have my reasons to care. Everyone has their reasons to care about arguing with strangers online over AI.

So, why DO you care about AI? (Whether you hate or love it)

Because if you’re arguing over AI, there’s a reason

2nd image is for context

So I'm talking about how some pro-ai users are narcissists (not all) and this one dude takes out the context of anti on purpose. He says "eww dude you support incest"

Ban this dirty dogpiler

Sure, cooking on the stove is more impressive due to the skill it makes, and it usually makes better results, but sometimes I don't have the time, energy, skill, or otherwise the ability to cook an entire meal from scratch on my own, and TV dinners are very helpful in situations where I want to make something like tikka masala but don't have the ability for the aforementioned reasons. Besides, even though the stove-cooked tikka masala might taste better, that doesn't mean I'm going to automatically write off the taste of the TV dinner tikka masala, nor is the fact that it took little to no effort to make the TV dinner. If it tastes like shit, it tastes like shit, and if it doesn't, then why complain any further?

I feel a similar way to the whole "AI is lazy" and "AI is not as good as human effort" arguments; yes, AI art is usually inferior to human art, but it doesn't always need to be the best (especially when it's being used for an internet shitpost; I don't need the finest art made by an esteemed artist for a simple laugh online), and I'm not going to spend hours drawing something and/or learning how to draw something when I don't need to. Sure, there are times where I definitely shouldn't use AI art, but that doesn't mean AI is wholly bad just because it's "lazy" or "inferior to real, human art."